Search found 5260 matches
- Mon May 06, 2024 7:23 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Syntax random
- Replies: 194
- Views: 113956
Re: Syntax random
You can force the (4)-like reading if you whack a big pause in there: 3b. "We didn't see ... [suspenseful pause] only the Louvre" (expecting a response of "What the hell? That's like top two things to see when you're in Paris!") That's the meaning that (3) should by rights take,...
- Mon May 06, 2024 6:51 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Syntax random
- Replies: 194
- Views: 113956
Re: Syntax random
Thinking about this a bit further, I think I can summarise the situation: We only didn’t see the Louvre means (for speakers who consider it valid) that we didn’t see the Louvre, but we did see the other sights. We didn’t only see the Louvre means that we did see the Louvre, but we also saw some othe...
- Mon May 06, 2024 5:40 am
- Forum: Conlangery
- Topic: AI in conlanging - present and future
- Replies: 6
- Views: 57
Re: AI in conlanging - present and future
For me, the fun in conlanging lies in figuring out what I want, personally, and investigating the richness of language myself. Why would I get a computer to do the fun bits for me? (And, if I want to describe languages created by someone else, actual linguistic fieldwork would give me far more inter...
- Mon May 06, 2024 3:13 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Syntax random
- Replies: 194
- Views: 113956
Re: Syntax random
“We only didn’t see the Louvre” needs no question mark from me—it’s perfectly licit. My takeaway would be that there was some list or set of things you visited on your trip or at least wanted to see, the Louvre being the only one you didn’t get to. (“We saw the Musée d’Orsay, the Arc de Triomphe, t...
- Mon May 06, 2024 3:13 am
- Forum: Conlangery
- Topic: Conlang Random Thread
- Replies: 2940
- Views: 2846641
Re: Conlang Random Thread
This is linguistics! Assume absolutely every terminological choice is subjective and willynilly, until proven otherwise. ‘Counterfactual’ is a sufficiently old term that I wouldn’t assume it refers to a single coherent thing.
- Sun May 05, 2024 7:12 pm
- Forum: Conlangery
- Topic: Conlang Random Thread
- Replies: 2940
- Views: 2846641
Re: Conlang Random Thread
I still can't figure out which clauses, the condition or the consequent, is supposed to be marked counterfactual and which is not. Or if they're both supposed to. [condition] [consequence] 1.a) [irrealis] [irrealis] 1.b) [irrealis] [counterfactual] 2.a) [irrealis] [irrealis] 2.b) [counterfactual] [...
- Sun May 05, 2024 2:53 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: The New ZBB Quote Thread
- Replies: 316
- Views: 339124
- Sun May 05, 2024 10:28 am
- Forum: Conlangery
- Topic: Conlang Random Thread
- Replies: 2940
- Views: 2846641
- Sat May 04, 2024 6:33 pm
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: "Experiencer"
- Replies: 40
- Views: 4197
Re: "Experiencer"
I think you’re both right! Some parts of language are very conscious, and other parts are so automatic as to be practically invisible to the untrained speaker. I saw a neat example of this when I read about classifiers in Lao (in Enfield’s grammar). Lao has two classification systems: numeral classi...
- Sat May 04, 2024 5:56 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Syntax random
- Replies: 194
- Views: 113956
Re: Syntax random
So… yeah, maybe you’re right, and I’m overthinking these questionable edge cases. (It is something I tend to do when thinking about syntax.) Oh, you're not alone. Any sentence, or word, can start to sound dubious if you stare at it too long. Actually, what I have is the opposite problem. Every sent...
- Sat May 04, 2024 5:06 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Syntax random
- Replies: 194
- Views: 113956
Re: Syntax random
We didn’t see [only the Louvre]. ⇒ We only didn’t see the Louvre. Yet, the first sentence exists in surface structure with a completely different meaning! For you, that meaning is unambiguously different; for me it’s ambiguous, and can be the same under highly marked circumstances. But, apparently,...
- Sat May 04, 2024 4:34 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: War in the Middle East, again
- Replies: 397
- Views: 73361
Re: War in the Middle East, again
if memory serves, Bradrn has repeatedly pointed out not being a Zionist...thats kinda the point being made in rebuttal to your points. I don’t understand what you mean here. I most certainly consider myself a Zionist. Sorry...when i was typing, I couldn't recall if you were not a Zionist, or a Zion...
- Sat May 04, 2024 4:33 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: The Contradictory Feelings Thread
- Replies: 666
- Views: 753374
Re: The Contradictory Feelings Thread
Can you send the organizers a message explaining your situation? Orléans is quite close to Paris; if you're actually interested in the conference it seems a bit strange not to at least try to go... Hmm, fair point. Maybe I will. (Of course I can also understand not wanting to commit to something ex...
- Sat May 04, 2024 3:53 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: The Contradictory Feelings Thread
- Replies: 666
- Views: 753374
Re: The Contradictory Feelings Thread
Whaat, why miss out on that opportunity? Because I’m barely coping as-is, and I’m worried I won’t cope if I do anything more stressful on top of this. Is there some draconian punishment if you don't show up after having confirmed? Er… I doubt it! But surely the whole point of confirming your attend...
- Sat May 04, 2024 3:36 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: The Contradictory Feelings Thread
- Replies: 666
- Views: 753374
Re: The Contradictory Feelings Thread
I submitted a poster to ICON2024 (advertised earlier on this board), and my submission got accepted! Yet, I’m having second thoughts on whether to confirm my attendance or not. I’ve now been living in Paris for a month, and I‘m still struggling to get used to it; I’m not sure whether further travel...
- Sat May 04, 2024 3:27 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: War in the Middle East, again
- Replies: 397
- Views: 73361
Re: War in the Middle East, again
2) Related to point 1). If we learned something over the last ten years, it's that when women complain about sexism and sexual assault, you believe them (and in fact the reality is probably far worse.) Now, you know what? When Jews mention antisemitism, you believe them. I appreciate your support, ...
- Sat May 04, 2024 1:59 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: War in the Middle East, again
- Replies: 397
- Views: 73361
Re: War in the Middle East, again
it is perfectly understandable why someone whose people are being massacred would speak in anger against those who subscribe to the ideology that drives that massacre. violence, or the call to violence, against an oppressor by a member of the people it is oppressing is fundamentally, qualitatively ...
- Sat May 04, 2024 12:43 pm
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: War in the Middle East, again
- Replies: 397
- Views: 73361
Re: War in the Middle East, again
In addition to all the violence I’ve already mentioned in my previous posts, which you clearly didn’t read. ok, fair enough, i hadn't. so i just did this and the closest thing to "violence" you brought up by protesters at american universities were not acts of physical violence but simply...
- Sat May 04, 2024 11:11 am
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: War in the Middle East, again
- Replies: 397
- Views: 73361
Re: War in the Middle East, again
the violence in the US demonstrations has been almost entirely instigated by zionists and police, not the protesters themselves, what the fuck are you talking about? I’m talking about, for instance, the way that they forcibly occupied a university building. In addition to all the violence I’ve alre...
- Sat May 04, 2024 10:30 am
- Forum: Ephemera
- Topic: The Contradictory Feelings Thread
- Replies: 666
- Views: 753374