Darren wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2024 7:05 pm
bradrn wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2024 7:03 pm
While trying to implement some new features, I realised I’m confused by this statement:
Darren wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 6:03 pm
I always end up having to make a category "X" which is just all the left over shit like
ŋ kʷ pʷ ɨ ˈ θ and never gets used for anything.
If those graphemes never get used for anything, then why do you need to include them in a category in the first place?
It's the category that never gets used. When rules produce new graphemes, sometimes it doesn't mind but other times it just gives a bunch of question marks.
Hmm… surely it should only give question marks if there’s another category declaration afterwards? That was my intention, at least; if it’s not doing that, there’s a bug.
It's a minor inconvenience at worst.
Sure, but for the next version I’d like to focus on fixing these inconveniences (so I can finally release v1.0).