Search found 96 matches
- Wed Sep 25, 2024 3:32 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Name That Language!
- Replies: 1541
- Views: 483919
Re: Name That Language!
I don't think it's Nuxalk because Nuxalk only has /a i o/, unless the vowels are being transcribed more as their surface realizations. Also, at least in the stereotype, Nuxalk is full of obstruent-only runs of consonants and I see none here.
- Wed Sep 25, 2024 2:46 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Name That Language!
- Replies: 1541
- Views: 483919
Re: Name That Language!
Is it an Algonquian language? It looks a little bit like Mikmaq actually but I'm not sure.
- Tue Sep 10, 2024 8:59 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Name That Language!
- Replies: 1541
- Views: 483919
Re: Name That Language!
This looks suspiciously like an Aboriginal Australian language (although my knowledge of languages in general is not nearly enough to figure out which one or even which group.)
- Tue Aug 27, 2024 7:25 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
How would our knowledge of Proto-Germanic be different if we didn't have Gothic? I assume we might be able to reconstruct the original nominative singular ending through runic evidence, but what else might be missing or different?
- Sun May 12, 2024 1:24 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
*bak- "club, peg, stick" is a classic; it seems nobody can ever fully dismiss it despite it stinking like week-old fish because there's no other conclusive explanation for the things it ties together. The semantics are terrible: Germanic *pagilaz (English pail ) is just about defensible a...
- Sat May 11, 2024 12:39 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
There is no reason that *h₃ could not have become voiced in the daughter that spawned Indo-Aryan. For instance, I have heard it posited that ME /x/ may have become voiced in the daughter that spawned StdE in positions where it did not merge with /f/ prior to disappearing altogether. (Of course, tha...
- Thu May 09, 2024 9:30 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
Back when I had just discovered this forum and was reading through the discussion on PIE (and it might have been here or on the old forum), I seem to recall someone hypothesizing that *h 3 was a rhotic rather like the one in English. Does anyone have any unconventional ideas on the pronunciation of ...
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 9:09 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
I think that the lack of a native etymology for the word for "seven" isn't really that much evidence. Proto-Indo-European is a language with just as much of a complex and layered history as English, and the lack of many (or any?) apparent etymologies for English numerals does not mean the...
- Tue Apr 16, 2024 1:45 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
Though I'm not sure I follow your line of thought. Surely it's possible that just a single numeral is a loanword? And no native etymology being proposed by such an extensive source and review of the earlier literature surely gives some weight to the notion that *septm is a loanword. I think that th...
- Sun Mar 31, 2024 12:14 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Marginal distinctions
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1537
Re: Marginal distinctions
What dialect of NAE realizes the rhotic as uvular?
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:48 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
- Replies: 4955
- Views: 2360285
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
I think "areal kingdoms" in the vein of floristic kingdoms would include: Australia Mainland SEA, including South China Insular SEA Eastern Siberia and Nearctic Western Siberia, Europe, South and Southwest Asia, North Africa Subsaharan Africa Eastern South America Western South America Ea...
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 1:03 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
- Replies: 4955
- Views: 2360285
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
It's well understood that tonogenesis in Southeast Asia was probably an areal change. But do we know if it originated in one language family in particular, or did it happen to all involved languages around the same time, before which none of the languages in the region were tonal?
- Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:36 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
- Replies: 4955
- Views: 2360285
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Does a similar sort of argument work for the Proto-Germanic a-stem masculine accusative singular?
- Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:32 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
- Replies: 4955
- Views: 2360285
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
I suspect that, even if, through some kind of magic trick or something, we would get a table with accurate numbers of currently spoken languages for each year of the past 30,000 years, it would still be difficult to sum them all up through time, since for that, you'd need some kind of standard for ...
- Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:09 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
- Replies: 4955
- Views: 2360285
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Maybe the peak of language density is somewhere between the neolithic revolution and the bronze age? Just a possibility. This is actually a really interesting question about language density that I hadn't thought of! That sounds roughly reasonable. Although perhaps it occurred in places on the brin...
- Thu Feb 22, 2024 2:04 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
- Replies: 4955
- Views: 2360285
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
How many languages have ever been spoken? There are seven-thousand-odd spoken today, roughly, but I'm wondering if we have an estimate for how many have been spoken at any point in time. I know this question is not very well-defined but even still there might be some way to put a rough number to it....
- Sun Feb 18, 2024 2:33 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
All that being said, what are people's thoughts on the stop system of PIE? Personally, I think it's likely that the glottalic viewpoint was true at some point in pre-Proto-Indo-European history (which would account for things like the absence of *b), but then evolved into the traditionally reconstru...
- Sun Feb 18, 2024 10:31 am
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
In my personal opinion, the "typological universals" are distributions of various stop consonants does not really have as much bearing on PIE phonology as people tend to assume. Such "universals" are found to be false all the time (like Northwest Mekeo and the idea of all languag...
- Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:22 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The "How Do You Pronounce X" Thread
- Replies: 1879
- Views: 4994543
Re: The "How Do You Pronounce X" Thread
I have heard this lowering in m i lk, van i lla, s i nce, dis i ntegrate, and antisem i tic, by speakers of various dialects of American English. (Further, I have heard the first vowel in "miracle" pronounced as [eɪ], which may be the realization of the DRESS vowel before /r/ here in Ameri...
- Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:39 pm
- Forum: Languages
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
- Replies: 1045
- Views: 1124572
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread's Sequel
I'm a newer member to this board but back when I was excitedly reading the entire history of this thread and its predecessor, I remember seeing your name quite a bit back then. Welcome back!