Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Conworlds and conlangs
Otto Kretschmer
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:09 pm
Location: Poland

Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Otto Kretschmer »

I like this kind of hypotheticals ;)

In 200 BC a group of Germanic peoples roughly equal to population of Magna Germania are teleported to Japan. They quickly subjugate both the Jomon and Yayoi people, assimilate 0% Asian them and as a result they gain some 20-30% Asian DNA. Language is unaffected.

What interesting directions could Proto Germanic take in such a scenario? The Germanic Japan will be culturally influenced by China and will not even know of Europe for good 1700 years in the best case.

Could this Japanese Germanic language borrow areal features like classifiers, limited number of syllabes etc
Zju
Posts: 816
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:05 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Zju »

Some time ago a similar scenario was discussed on this board, but with Latin instead of Proto Germanic. Rather unfortunately, I cannot find it, but the gist is that it all depends on population size - a Roman legion teleported to the Japanese archipelago roughly 0 AD is for a brief time very influential, but after three or four generation leaves little more than some toponyms and personal names, in terms of linguistic heritage.
/j/ <j>

Ɂaləɂahina asəkipaɂə ileku omkiroro salka.
Loɂ ɂerleku asəɂulŋusikraɂə seləɂahina əɂətlahɂun əiŋɂiɂŋa.
Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ.
Otto Kretschmer
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:09 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Otto Kretschmer »

Not this forum :P it was CBB and it was my thread

In my Germanic scenerio Germanics would outnumber native Japanese population 3 to 1 and would conquer the island very quickly. The native Yayoi and Jomon would not even leave a linguistic mark

But there is a question - will prolonged contact with Chinese change the language in other eays than by borrowing?
User avatar
Rounin Ryuuji
Posts: 2992
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Rounin Ryuuji »

Probably about as much as it did on Japanese and Korean, though I don't know why you wouldn't want a substratum, too.
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2685
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by zompist »

Note, this is a conworlding idea and I'm going to move it to Conlangery.
keenir
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:14 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by keenir »

Otto Kretschmer wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 6:29 pmIn my Germanic scenerio Germanics would outnumber native Japanese population 3 to 1 and would conquer the island very quickly. The native Yayoi and Jomon would not even leave a linguistic mark
If the Jomon and Yayoi are outnumbered but not exterminated, why would they not leave so much as a mark? (I could buy it if you said they don't leave a massive mark, but none at all?)
Otto Kretschmer
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:09 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Otto Kretschmer »

A slight mark may as well be :)
Travis B.
Posts: 6256
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Travis B. »

Consider the United States - European settlers and their slaves far outnumbered the native population, which was decimated by disease and driven onto reservations, yet you can find many placenames (e.g. here in Wisconsin) which are clearly of native origin.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka ha wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate ha eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
keenir
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:14 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by keenir »

Travis B. wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 6:31 pm Consider the United States - European settlers and their slaves far outnumbered the native population, which was decimated by disease and driven onto reservations, yet you can find many placenames (e.g. here in Wisconsin) which are clearly of native origin.
Or just England, where even multiple waves (Saxons, Jutes, Normans, Romans, etc) didn't erase all of the native influence.....I think Dr. McWhorter (in What language is - and what language isn't) mentions the Celtic/Welsh "periphrasic "do", that Germanic (and I assume French) don't do.
User avatar
dɮ the phoneme
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 2:53 am
Location: On either side of the tongue, below the alveolar ridge
Contact:

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by dɮ the phoneme »

Honestly, not to be overly critical, but I feel that if the preceding inhabitants don't leave much of a linguistic mark it's afar less interesting scenario. I think a primarily Germanic Shikoku adjacent to a Yamato dominated Honshuu could be extremely interesting, then you'd get Sinitic + Japonic + possibly other influences.
Ye knowe eek that, in forme of speche is chaunge
With-inne a thousand yeer, and wordes tho
That hadden pris, now wonder nyce and straunge
Us thinketh hem; and yet they spake hem so,
And spedde as wel in love as men now do.

(formerly Max1461)
User avatar
Rounin Ryuuji
Posts: 2992
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Rounin Ryuuji »

That would, indeed, be very interesting. You could also have Germanic Kyuushuu, if you would rather. Japonic is such an interesting thing I shouldn't like to see it erased, but I have my very obvious biases.
Otto Kretschmer
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:09 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Otto Kretschmer »

:arrow: I wonder whether there could be a Portuguese or Dutch settlement in Japan before 1600 with the language surviving until the present day?
User avatar
Rounin Ryuuji
Posts: 2992
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Rounin Ryuuji »

That's also a possibility.
User avatar
dɮ the phoneme
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 2:53 am
Location: On either side of the tongue, below the alveolar ridge
Contact:

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by dɮ the phoneme »

Otto Kretschmer wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:37 pm :arrow: I wonder whether there could be a Portuguese or Dutch settlement in Japan before 1600 with the language surviving until the present day?
That's a very real possibility, if history had gone a bit differently. I... might actually have to explore that as an alt-history set up
Ye knowe eek that, in forme of speche is chaunge
With-inne a thousand yeer, and wordes tho
That hadden pris, now wonder nyce and straunge
Us thinketh hem; and yet they spake hem so,
And spedde as wel in love as men now do.

(formerly Max1461)
Otto Kretschmer
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:09 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Otto Kretschmer »

dɮ the phoneme wrote: Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:03 pm
Otto Kretschmer wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:37 pm :arrow: I wonder whether there could be a Portuguese or Dutch settlement in Japan before 1600 with the language surviving until the present day?
T being hat's a very real possibility, if history had gone a bit beinngdifferently. I... might actually have to explore that as an alt-history set up
Is 400 years enough for serious linguistic chnge?


If you want IE population in Japan, work with an idea of Greek speaking Jews being expelled from Rome and ending up in Japan
Travis B.
Posts: 6256
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Travis B. »

Otto Kretschmer wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:09 am Is 400 years enough for serious linguistic chnge?
Look at Afrikaans or many a creole language.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka ha wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate ha eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
User avatar
Rounin Ryuuji
Posts: 2992
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Rounin Ryuuji »

Otto Kretschmer wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:09 am
dɮ the phoneme wrote: Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:03 pm
Otto Kretschmer wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:37 pm :arrow: I wonder whether there could be a Portuguese or Dutch settlement in Japan before 1600 with the language surviving until the present day?
T being hat's a very real possibility, if history had gone a bit beinngdifferently. I... might actually have to explore that as an alt-history set up
Is 400 years enough for serious linguistic chnge?


If you want IE population in Japan, work with an idea of Greek speaking Jews being expelled from Rome and ending up in Japan
Persia and India say hi.

Edit: Potential for a large Zoroastrian population fleeing Islamic conquests would certainly exist, I think.
Richard W
Posts: 1405
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:53 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Richard W »

dɮ the phoneme wrote: Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:03 pm
Otto Kretschmer wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:37 pm :arrow: I wonder whether there could be a Portuguese or Dutch settlement in Japan before 1600 with the language surviving until the present day?
That's a very real possibility, if history had gone a bit differently. I... might actually have to explore that as an alt-history set up
Could the Christians have preserved a working knowledge of Latin? It seems that they didn't.
Otto Kretschmer
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:09 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by Otto Kretschmer »

Why not? Jews maintained knowledge of Hebrew for millenia.
keenir
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:14 pm

Re: Proto Germanic ISOT to Japan 200 BC

Post by keenir »

Otto Kretschmer wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:09 am
dɮ the phoneme wrote: Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:03 pm
Otto Kretschmer wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:37 pm :arrow: I wonder whether there could be a Portuguese or Dutch settlement in Japan before 1600 with the language surviving until the present day?
T being hat's a very real possibility, if history had gone a bit beinngdifferently. I... might actually have to explore that as an alt-history set up
Is 400 years enough for serious linguistic chnge?
English suggests it is.

wait...whats the yardstick for serious ?
If you want IE population in Japan, work with an idea of Greek speaking Jews being expelled from Rome and ending up in Japan
then why not just use (Crassus?) and his soldiers being shuttled about until they end up in Japan? (didn't they reportedly end up in China as it was?)

or use Tocharian. :)
Post Reply