Where was the religious test? Did any of Trump's executive orders concern themselves with the precise definition of "Muslim"? I'd expect a Muslim ban to have to include language determining what a Muslim is.The Druze religion developed from an Islamic sect, but isn't typically considered to be Islam today - do the Druze count as Muslims? What about followers of Rene Guenon? Or was the plan to just leave the definition of "Muslim" to the courts?
Another hypothesis is that Trump was, like, a politician.
I don't care about Trump one way or the other. To the extent that he was good, he was good; to the extent that he was bad, he was bad. Eventually he'll be in the history books with Grover Cleveland, and if there's any 'long arc of history' at all, it pretty clearly bends toward evaluating Trump with the same methods we use to evaluate Cleveland. (If there was ever a more boring president than Cleveland, fill in his name instead.)I don't even get this... you're admitting that the policy is bad, but badness is a binary quality? Is the conservative policy now that there is no such thing as the word "worse", or does this semantic nihilism only apply when people criticize Donald Trump?
I just don't think that the history books will be like, and then, under Trump, the US government started being mean to the Palestinians, which was something that only Trump could've gotten away with.
I'm also not convinced that media pressure was relevant here. Half of my exposure to the NYT these days is people in the pro-Palestine camp complaining about how they bring out the passive voice whenever the IDF brains a ten-year-old. Is there a huge iceberg of pro-Palestine media that I've missed by not owning a TV?