Well, yes I think that dialectal variation in both languages is playing a role here. But I also think that there is a fairly strong tendency for standardish BrE speakers to perceive standardish German /a/ as like TRAP, while standardish German speakers perceive STRUT as closer. So Germans (as in this thread) think there's a potential problem with "Kant", but English speakers (including, for the most part, Americans, though they'll often go with LOT rather than TRAP) don't hear one.Creyeditor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 1:39 pmI definitely agree. It is also different from the BATH vowel. It might be important to note that I am from Northern Germany and there is no systematic contrast for me between short /a/ and the unstressed vocalized R/a-schwa /ɐ/ in Arbeiter.Raphael wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 1:16 pmThe vowel in "Kant" is closer to some of the STRUT recordings than to any of the TRAP recordings, IMO, though many of those are very hard to tell apart for me.anteallach wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 12:30 pm What impression do you get from the recordings of TRAP and STRUT (and others, perhaps) in Geoff Lindsey's posts
https://www.englishspeechservices.com/b ... sh-vowels/
and
https://www.englishspeechservices.com/b ... r-dummies/
I don't think length is the issue; if that were the case it would get anglicised with PALM, but the usual BrE pronunciation is with TRAP.