My Present-er Project

[mocha]

Starting a new thread since this has nothing to do with the last one.

Last night I made a tool to inflect Cadhinor words:


It should be able to correctly conjugate all regular verbs.



It can also inflect all nouns and pronouns, although the console does not correctly display dh / kh / th, so I might have to replace the special characters with dh/kh/th...

I knew a tool a long time ago that could look at a Latin word, and give all possiblilities as to what type/inflection it is. For example, xoxo could be 3rd Declension nominative (Like homo or Plato), or perhaps 2nd declension dative/ablative (like filio or bello), or even a verb inflection. I'd like to have a feature like that, and I'd also like to add Verdurian, too.

[mocha]

Aww yis. Here we go.

Pocket Revouse in action:



If I had the patience, I would try to go through the Cadhinor corpus and try to determine the probability of each match based on how common it is.

[mocha]

Question.

On the grammar for Ismain: http://www.zompist.com/ismain.htm#Conjugation

It says

For ease of comparison, the same verbs are used as in the Caďinor section; but there are no differences in conjugation between the two -n verbs or the two -ŕ verbs.

However, the third person plural past subjunctive forms for the -n verbs seem to disagree: the column for rign implies the affix is -indn, while the column for mizn implies the affix is -inn. Which is the correct form? (I assume -inn, but...)

Edit: I also noticed for the second person singular past anterior clajŕe is *claŕje and for the second person singular present subjunctive it has *beçtede and *clajede instead of what I think should be beçteşy and clajeşy.

[zompist]

The inflection guesser is pretty neat!

However, the third person plural past subjunctive forms for the -n verbs seem to disagree: the column for rign implies the affix is -indn, while the column for mizn implies the affix is -inn. Which is the correct form? (I assume -inn, but...)

They should both be -indn.

Edit: I also noticed for the second person singular past anterior clajŕe is *claŕje

Yeah, that's a typo.

and for the second person singular present subjunctive it has *beçtede and *clajede instead of what I think should be beçteşy and clajeşy.

I think you're right: the 2s subjunctive, past and present, should end in -y not -e for -r verbs. (And no -ed.)