Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Overall Catalan appears to me to be closer to an "average" western Romance than either French or Castilian, both of which have gone in their own ways. It just happens that French has gone really far in its own way.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Thank you for your replies, everyone. I had wondered because I had heard a few snippets of Catalan-born soccer coach Pep Guardiola speaking in English, and his accent sounded generally closer to a French accent than to a Spanish accent to me.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
A wonderfully ANADEW moment: I was working out the numbers for my language, and noticed that regular sound change would mean that tow ‘five’ and toy ‘six’ differ by only a single consonant. Then I browsed zompist’s numbers list, and discovered that Ewe has not one but two pairs of numbers differing by a single phoneme:
- eve ‘two’ vs ene ‘four’
- adé ‘six’ vs adré ‘seven’
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Well, if we're looking for single pairs, we can add French deux '2' and dix '10' before vowels.
But if we look beyond '10', we've got, in lects with an accent shift', English '13' and '30' etc., and consequently in noisy environments one often hears three oh for '30'.
But if we look beyond '10', we've got, in lects with an accent shift', English '13' and '30' etc., and consequently in noisy environments one often hears three oh for '30'.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Unrelated: Are the phones of whispered words substantially phonetically different from their counterparts in non-whispered words? I mean, aside from the different volume?
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Aargh, and I’m actually learning French right now… I feel a bit silly for missing this.
In French there’s also cinq and cent. But I’m inclined to focus on numbers 1–10.But if we look beyond '10', we've got, in lects with an accent shift', English '13' and '30' etc., and consequently in noisy environments one often hears three oh for '30'.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 9:15 am
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Yes, there is a difference in phonation. Here is a schematic representation of the articulatory difference.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
In my dialect thirty and thirteen can sound nearly identical if you don't geminate the /t/ in thirteen because final /n/ is commonly elided in many environments, being preserved only as nasalization of the final vowel (which can be weak).Richard W wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 9:41 am Well, if we're looking for single pairs, we can add French deux '2' and dix '10' before vowels.
But if we look beyond '10', we've got, in lects with an accent shift', English '13' and '30' etc., and consequently in noisy environments one often hears three oh for '30'.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
- WeepingElf
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
I once got the wrong dish in a restaurant because the waitress, who had asked me for the number of the dish I ordered, had misheard einhundertzwanzig '120' as einundzwanzig '21'.bradrn wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 7:40 am A wonderfully ANADEW moment: I was working out the numbers for my language, and noticed that regular sound change would mean that tow ‘five’ and toy ‘six’ differ by only a single consonant. Then I browsed zompist’s numbers list, and discovered that Ewe has not one but two pairs of numbers differing by a single phoneme:
In fact, we can almost increase this to three pairs: zompist’s list also has the astonishingly close enyí ‘eight’ vs enyíè ‘nine’. Alas, none of the other sources confirm this: they all give ‘nine’ as some form of enyiɖe or asieke. But as if to compensate, they all give some variation of ɛtɔ ‘three’ vs atɔ̃́ ‘five’.
- eve ‘two’ vs ene ‘four’
- adé ‘six’ vs adré ‘seven’
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
My conlang pages
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Who rounds or doesn't round the vowel in gonna? In the dialect here it is [ˈɡ̥ʌ̃ɾ̃ə(ː)] or even just [ɡ̥ʌ̃ː], but I have heard people on the radio with pronunciations with rounded (and closer) vowels such as [ˈɡ̥õ̞ɾ̃ə(ː)].
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Thank you! So voiceless and voiced sounds merge in whispered or murmured speech?Creyeditor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 11, 2024 1:54 pmYes, there is a difference in phonation. Here is a schematic representation of the articulatory difference.
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 9:15 am
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Ah, sorry. Murmured is an alternative term for breathy voice, I think. But you are correct, primary cues for a voicing contrast are neutralized in whispery voice. Secondary cues usually help, such as duration of the preceding vowel in English or presence/absence of a noisy release period in German.
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
In Australia it's [ɔ] LOT. In the UK it seems to be [ʌ] STRUT (at least in the south of England; do northerners have [ʊ]?).
I assume the vowel you're hearing on the radio is THOUGHT?
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
It definitely is not THOUGHT (remember that while [o] is THOUGHT in much of AusE, it is not THOUGHT in NAE), because THOUGHT in NAE (this is American radio, remember) is a low vowel and is often unrounded (i.e. [ɒ] or [ɑ]), while this is a much closer, and rounder vowel.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 3:11 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
For me it is normally schwa. If I used a full vowel it would be LOT, but I think that's just because of the spelling.
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
What implications do spoonerisms have for cognitive theories of language?
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
I have a long nasal schwa in I'm going to when I realize it as [ˈãẽ̯mə̃ː] but not when I realize it as [ˈãẽ̯mˌɡʌ̃ː].anteallach wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2024 12:41 pmFor me it is normally schwa. If I used a full vowel it would be LOT, but I think that's just because of the spelling.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
I'd say [ãjŋ gʌ̃ʌ]. The trailoff of nasalization might be heard as a consonant, maybe.
I don't recall hearing any [o] sounds, but rather than an innovation, it might be retaining the original vowel of "going".
Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
The implication that we all make mistakes? *shrugs*Man in Space wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2024 5:06 pm What implications do spoonerisms have for cognitive theories of language?