This is part of Standard French as well. Which reminds me, me and zompist also forgot os /ɔs/ 'bone', plural /o/ 'bones'.
Shortest words for basic concepts
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
In French French, the plural is /œf/ in most contexts, i.e. in contexts other than after a determiner or after an adjective ending with [z]. I'm guessing that's why he specifically mentioned Cajun.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Wait it's not like that in Quebecois French?
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť
kårroť
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
I specifically mentioned Cajun because I never formally studied Standard French, have learned it chiefly from reading, and thus can’t speak at all authoritatively about its pronunciation (nor that of Canadian French varieties, for similar reasons).
I would actually expect that œufs mostly occurs with a determiner and that contexts without one would be the exceptions.
What’s the best we can do for the seasons? Osage has pee for spring and American English has fall. What about summer and winter?
-
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:58 pm
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Turkish has yaz and kış for summer and winter.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
I remember that Cheyenne's word for winter is ae, having learned it from this board once as an example of radical sound change in motion. The only dictionary I can find spells this áa'e , however.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
In Vietnamese, 'summer' is hè, and 'fall' is thu, both from Chinese. 'Winter' in both Chechen and Ingush is ӏа [ʡɑ], and 'spring' in Avar is их [iχ] with a uvular fricative.
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:19 pm
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
No, it can actually be /ø/ as well. It can be pronounced the same as the singular nowadays, but it is part of the standard to pronounce it /ø/.
A couple references:
In one or two cases, although the plural is formed normally, pronunciation of the plural form is affected –Source: Malcolm Offord. A Student Grammar of French. 2006. Page 143.
le boeuf – les boeufs = bullock – bullocks, l’oeuf – les oeufs = egg – eggs, –f– not pronounced in plural; l’os – les os = bone – bones, –s sounded in singular but not in plural.
singular => oeuf "euf"Source: User Sel&poivre. "œuf / œufs (prononciation), post #2". WordReference.com Language Forums: French-English Vocabulary / Vocabulaire Français-Anglais. 2006-11-13. URL: https://forum.wordreference.com/threads ... on.293660/
plural => des oeufs as "eux".
This is also true of the standard French of Quebec, as can be seen in the following quote.
On prononce la consonne finale des mots bœuf, œuf et os lorsqu'on les emploie au singulier. Bœuf et œuf se prononcent donc [bœf] et [œf] comme le chiffre neuf, et os se prononce [ɔs] comme dans le mot brosse. Au pluriel, toutefois, on ne prononce pas la consonne finale. On dit plutôt, en fermant la voyelle, [bø] (beu) pour bœufs et [ø] (eu) pour œufs, les deux mots rimant alors avec feu. De même, os au pluriel se prononce [o] comme le mot eau.Source: Office québécois de la langue française. "Bœuf, œuf et os". Banque de dépannage linguistique. URL: http://bdl.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/bdl/gabarit_bdl.asp?id=3067
Last edited by Kuchigakatai on Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
.
Last edited by Whimemsz on Sun Jun 07, 2020 6:39 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Oh, the other day I came up with a word that would've fit that thread: English dud, meaning a piece of explosive that didn't explode.
My latest quiz:
Kuvavisa: Pohjois-Amerikan suurimmat O:lla alkavat kaupungit
Kuvavisa: Pohjois-Amerikan suurimmat O:lla alkavat kaupungit
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
I'm not sure, but apparently not? :-/
https://vi.wiktionary.org/wiki/h%C3%A8#Tiếng_Việt
https://vi.wiktionary.org/wiki/thu#Tiếng_Việt
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be looking at there. I only see one clear example of freestanding nominal usage (thu đã qua, đông đang tới) and it reads like it might be a proverbial saying of some kind.Vijay wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 2:08 pmI'm not sure, but apparently not? :-/
https://vi.wiktionary.org/wiki/h%C3%A8#Tiếng_Việt
https://vi.wiktionary.org/wiki/thu#Tiếng_Việt
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Okay, then I guess they aren't free morphemes. Idk.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Nahuatl has a few roots that are monosyllabic and "expanded" (but in a irregular and somewhat haphazard way) in composition/derivation because the language just doesn't like super short words. The nominal ones are also "hidden" by the absolute suffix.
ā-tl, "water" (often ātl- or ālt- in composition, e.g. āltepētl, ā-tl+tepē-tl "city")
e-tl, "beans"
i, "to drink" (to drink water is ātli, another irregular compound)
o, "to lie" (The actual root in the common verb onoc, "to lie". By colonial time it was always used with the directional prefix on- and a -c that would normally be a preterite or participial marker.)
And probably over a dozen common roots (including several verbs. e.g. cua "eat" and cui "take" —the <u> is a labialization mark: kwa etc.) with only two phonemes.
ā-tl, "water" (often ātl- or ālt- in composition, e.g. āltepētl, ā-tl+tepē-tl "city")
e-tl, "beans"
i, "to drink" (to drink water is ātli, another irregular compound)
o, "to lie" (The actual root in the common verb onoc, "to lie". By colonial time it was always used with the directional prefix on- and a -c that would normally be a preterite or participial marker.)
And probably over a dozen common roots (including several verbs. e.g. cua "eat" and cui "take" —the <u> is a labialization mark: kwa etc.) with only two phonemes.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Polish ił — a type of a finely-grained rock composed of clay minerals, with little non-clay traces, but distinct from clay, formed primarily before the quaternary
[she/her, they/them]
formerly “Pole, the”
formerly “Pole, the”
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Couple more from Osage:
paa snow
hpa nose
ie language
The basic meaning of ie is "speak; speech" but it also forms language names (e.g. wažáže íe "Osage language") and it's the shortest free morpheme I know of for "language". hp is a digraph; Osage has a fortis stop series which is often realised with preaspiration.
paa snow
hpa nose
ie language
The basic meaning of ie is "speak; speech" but it also forms language names (e.g. wažáže íe "Osage language") and it's the shortest free morpheme I know of for "language". hp is a digraph; Osage has a fortis stop series which is often realised with preaspiration.
-
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:58 pm
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Maybe Mandarin yǔ 語 for a tie? One segment and a tone; but maybe you wouldn't consider it a free morpheme.
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
Yeah, in the sense of "language", the usual term is bisyllabic 語言. But maybe Cantonese [jyː˩˧] or [waː˨] can be freely used this way?akam chinjir wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:13 pmMaybe Mandarin yǔ 語 for a tie? One segment and a tone; but maybe you wouldn't consider it a free morpheme.
-
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:58 pm
Re: Shortest words for basic concepts
I don't think so, except I guess in set phrases, like in Mandarin, I guess. I was wondering about waah 話, which is common as a verb, but it's two segments as well as a tone (the h marks tone). (But my instincts about this sort of thing are pretty skewed by classical Chinese.)