Twin Aster

Conworlds and conlangs
TomHChappell
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:40 am
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Twin Aster

Post by TomHChappell »

I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!

What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
….
Thanks!
This seems very interesting to me, even though I understand less of it that than what I don’t understand!
bradrn
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Twin Aster

Post by bradrn »

TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!

What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
TomHChappell
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:40 am
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Twin Aster

Post by TomHChappell »

bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Thanks! I’ll ask Twin Aster to confirm.
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1829
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Twin Aster

Post by Man in Space »

TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:07 pm
bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Thanks! I’ll ask Twin Aster to confirm.
bradrn is correct. Those are the initials for the series of glyphs—CC has seven vowels listed in the customary order /a ɛ ə ɔ i ɨ u/.
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1829
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Twin Aster

Post by Man in Space »

MV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

BV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

NV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1829
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Twin Aster

Post by Man in Space »

DV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

QV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

JV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

GV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

All the two-consonant onsets are accounted for; only the triconsonantal onsets are left. We're in the home stretch now.
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1829
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Twin Aster

Post by Man in Space »

RDV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

RDG series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

XT series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CTR series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CRN series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CTG series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

And there we have it. I might make alternative/multiple phonetic radicals for some of these later, but other than that…here we are.
bradrn
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Twin Aster

Post by bradrn »

Man in Space wrote: Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:56 pm In the form in which it was principally promulgated back in the day, Caber logograms (toqitŭvadar1 or qanvan2) were originally made using a small brush (ŭmŭ means both 'paint' and 'write'); however, they originally designed from scoring on wood (because druids, after all). They weren't the only ones to discover writing3, but they were the first, around the XXI C. BC.
Returning to this point: I rediscovered my old calligraphy brush. It’s a very bad one (complete with some kind of squeezy internal paint source that smells really terrible for some reason), and on top of that I’m awful at brush calligraphy, but I’ve at least proven to my own satisfaction that bottom-to-top writing is practical with a brush. The shapes of these radicals are rather intricate, but after a few goes I at least managed to write this one successfully.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Post Reply