I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!
…
What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
….
Thanks!
This seems very interesting to me, even though I understand less of it that than what I don’t understand!
Twin Aster
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:40 am
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: Twin Aster
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.TomHChappell wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!
…
What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:40 am
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: Twin Aster
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1829
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: Twin Aster
bradrn is correct. Those are the initials for the series of glyphs—CC has seven vowels listed in the customary order /a ɛ ə ɔ i ɨ u/.TomHChappell wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:07 pmThanks! I’ll ask Twin Aster to confirm.
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1829
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1829
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: Twin Aster
DV series
QV series
JV series
CV series
GV series
All the two-consonant onsets are accounted for; only the triconsonantal onsets are left. We're in the home stretch now.
QV series
JV series
CV series
GV series
All the two-consonant onsets are accounted for; only the triconsonantal onsets are left. We're in the home stretch now.
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1829
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: Twin Aster
RDV series
RDG series
XT series
CTR series
CRN series
CTG series
And there we have it. I might make alternative/multiple phonetic radicals for some of these later, but other than that…here we are.
RDG series
XT series
CTR series
CRN series
CTG series
And there we have it. I might make alternative/multiple phonetic radicals for some of these later, but other than that…here we are.
Re: Twin Aster
Returning to this point: I rediscovered my old calligraphy brush. It’s a very bad one (complete with some kind of squeezy internal paint source that smells really terrible for some reason), and on top of that I’m awful at brush calligraphy, but I’ve at least proven to my own satisfaction that bottom-to-top writing is practical with a brush. The shapes of these radicals are rather intricate, but after a few goes I at least managed to write this one successfully.Man in Space wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:56 pm In the form in which it was principally promulgated back in the day, Caber logograms (toqitŭvadar1 or qanvan2) were originally made using a small brush (ŭmŭ means both 'paint' and 'write'); however, they originally designed from scoring on wood (because druids, after all). They weren't the only ones to discover writing3, but they were the first, around the XXI C. BC.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)