Conlang Random Thread

Conworlds and conlangs
bradrn
Posts: 6527
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Conlang Random Thread

Post by bradrn »

foxcatdog wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:27 pm You can't really approximate sound changes onto different language families to much. How would you approximate processes like umlaut. You can't start with a mostly monosyllabic language and end up with Torres-Banks style metaphony or approximate englishes process of final syllable reduction with an already monosyllabic language.
Old Chinese wasn’t monosyllabic, though.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
keenir
Posts: 1005
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:14 pm

Re: Conlang Random Thread

Post by keenir »

foxcatdog wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:27 pm You can't really approximate sound changes onto different language families to much.
You can if you're making a bogolang...I think one of the more famous examples of this is Wenydyk(sp).
How would you approximate processes like umlaut.
i thought Old/Middle English had umlauts.
User avatar
jal
Posts: 999
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:13 pm

Re: Conlang Random Thread

Post by jal »

keenir wrote: Fri Jan 31, 2025 1:30 ami thought Old/Middle English had umlauts.
Yes, but Old Chinese hadn't. I think the point is that the phonological processes that caused it in English can't happen in Old Chinese for lack of suitable environments.


JAL
Post Reply