Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2022 10:30 am
Thank you for created numbers from your new conlangs!
You're welcome!
You're welcome!
Thank you!
Man in Space wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 3:47 pm kélen hún standard water (lit. 'darkwater')
kélen suú heavy water (lit. 'truewater')
Thank you both!Ares Land wrote: ↑Mon May 02, 2022 3:45 am Very interesting as always.
I'm curious as to the etymology of these:
Man in Space wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 3:47 pm kélen hún standard water (lit. 'darkwater')
kélen suú heavy water (lit. 'truewater')
If you use XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX, getting capital schwa and diacritics should be trivial.Man in Space wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 5:50 pm /a ə e i o u/ a/á ʌ/ʌ́ ə/ə́ e/é i/í o/ó u/ú
/a̰ ə̰ ḛ ḭ o̰ ṵ/ ą/ǎ ʌ̨/ʌ̌ ę/ě į/ǐ ǫ/ǒ ų/ǔ Yes, for some reason I have an easier time creating wedge than capital schwa in LaTeX with this font. I'm debating whether to go for schwa or wedge. I think schwa is the safer bet but wedge actually compiles the diacritics without having to hack it as much. Anyway.
I’m not sure this counts as ‘sandhi’ per se… but it certainly is interesting morphophonology; do you have any more details?Man in Space wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 5:50 pm ryiʌrlʌktsʌ́ts
- reʌ-
- circular.motion
- eʌr-
- REL
- l-
- SBJ
- k-
- CONT.IND
- tsʌts
- go
'centrifuge' (lit. 'that which impels itself to go in a circular motion continuously'; did I mention Kgáweq’ can noun verbs by relativizing them? also, dig those sandhi rules)
…but it would still be nice to see the paradigms!Slot -4: The subject
Boring.
…
Slot -2: The object
Again, boring.
This seems suspiciously close to a standard middle voice category.Slot -3: Version
I wrote this stuff like six, eight years ago, it's kind of hard for me to wrap my head around now…basically, it often introduces some sort of valency shift/benefactive or autobenefactive function.
What are the semantic differences between the various aspects? I’m particularly confused about ‘continuative’ vs ‘imperfective’.Slot -1: TAM
There are sixteen of these suckers, with two categories: Aspect (momentane, imperfective, continuative, perfective) and mood (indicative, subjunctive, interrogative, imperative).
This is a bit vague; could you supply more details please?Slot +1: The qualifier
These augment the subject and/or object in some way.
Yay!
The issue is I'm calling another font family with fontspec and the special character/diacritic support on it is piss-poor.
Basically it's that you can't have two vowels in hiatus so the first diphthong gets converted to /j/.bradrn wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 4:11 amI’m not sure this counts as ‘sandhi’ per se… but it certainly is interesting morphophonology; do you have any more details?Man in Space wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 5:50 pmryiʌrlʌktsʌ́ts
- reʌ-
- circular.motion
- eʌr-
- REL
- l-
- SBJ
- k-
- CONT.IND
- tsʌts
- go
'centrifuge' (lit. 'that which impels itself to go in a circular motion continuously'; did I mention Kgáweq’ can noun verbs by relativizing them? also, dig those sandhi rules)
I plead "it was way past my bedtime when writing that".
There's more to it than that; basically it introduces another argument (not necessarily identical to the subject) that gets affected by the action in some way.
Essentially, momentane is instantaneous/brief, imperfective is default/ongoing, continuative is done for a long time (so "continuative/iterative/protractive" might be a better descriptor, though much less concise), perfective is the action finished.
Sure, I can try (I'm on my lunch break so this will be brief for the time being)—essentially, you can augment or diminish the subject and/or object with the qualifier affix. This is especially useful for relativized verbs as you can make a judgment as to the nature of the resultant noun; e.g.:
Ah, I see. Could you perhaps move to another font? Alternately, when I’ve run into similar problems, I’ve found it easy to define an alternate font for areas of text requiring extended character support, e.g.: (https://github.com/bradrn/Conkey/blob/8 ... tex#L3-L11)Man in Space wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 11:56 amThe issue is I'm calling another font family with fontspec and the special character/diacritic support on it is piss-poor.
Code: Select all
\usepackage{fontspec}
% Default font
\setmainfont{Gentium Plus}
% Fallback font for characters unavailable in Gentium
\newfontfamily{\fallbackfont}{Times New Roman}
\DeclareTextFontCommand{\tfb}{\fallbackfont}
% Fallback font for symbols
\newfontfamily{\fallbackfontsymbol}{Segoe UI Symbol}
\DeclareTextFontCommand{\tfbs}{\fallbackfontsymbol}
So basically an applicative, then? (Though I’d need more detail to be able to say exactly what kind of applicative.)
No, they are not. I didn't know I could put them up there. I will have to look into how to do this.
<3 I love fanfiction. (Or whatever you would call this…fan-translation?)
I will look into this a little later, as I am currently with my vocalist mixing the album.
Sorry for the confusion! -r specifically was a collectivizing affix. It fell into disuse in many of the descendant languages but was fossilized in what the Caber called themselves.
You honor me by doing this. Thank you!