Page 75 of 80
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:02 pm
by alice
doctor shark wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 1:27 pm
Not inherently: gothic metal is an offshoot of gothic rock, and there are plenty of other kinds of metal. (Death, doom, thrash, glam, folk, symphonic...)
"Plenty" is an understatement; when I was in short trousers there was also grind, core, and speed metal, to name but three. Surely someone somewhere has make an exhaustive family tree or something.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:06 pm
by Raphael
alice wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:02 pm
doctor shark wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 1:27 pm
Not inherently: gothic metal is an offshoot of gothic rock, and there are plenty of other kinds of metal. (Death, doom, thrash, glam, folk, symphonic...)
"Plenty" is an understatement; when I was in short trousers there was also grind, core, and speed metal, to name but three. Surely someone somewhere has make an exhaustive family tree or something.
But aren't most of them, in different ways, very dark and gloomy?
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:40 pm
by WeepingElf
Raphael wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:06 pm
alice wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:02 pm
doctor shark wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 1:27 pm
Not inherently: gothic metal is an offshoot of gothic rock, and there are plenty of other kinds of metal. (Death, doom, thrash, glam, folk, symphonic...)
"Plenty" is an understatement; when I was in short trousers there was also grind, core, and speed metal, to name but three. Surely someone somewhere has make an exhaustive family tree or something.
But aren't most of them, in different ways, very dark and gloomy?
Many are, but many aren't. You seem to know
nothing about metal music.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:57 pm
by Nortaneous
Raphael wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:06 pm
alice wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 3:02 pm
doctor shark wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 1:27 pm
Not inherently: gothic metal is an offshoot of gothic rock, and there are plenty of other kinds of metal. (Death, doom, thrash, glam, folk, symphonic...)
"Plenty" is an understatement; when I was in short trousers there was also grind, core, and speed metal, to name but three. Surely someone somewhere has make an exhaustive family tree or something.
But aren't most of them, in different ways, very dark and gloomy?
Not really. There's the current wave of (disparagingly, but the only real term that exists) "hipster black metal" that takes inspiration from outside genres like shoegaze and American minimalism -
Liturgy,
Alcest,
Trhä, etc. - and "black'n'roll" bands like
Kvelertak. Then there are EDM-influenced / "pop metal" bands (afaik mostly from Eastern Europe until recently) like
Chysta Krynycya,
Semargl (which started as death metal, released some pop albums, and is now EDM), and
Vapor Hiemis - and that's just within black metal! (Except Kvelertak - "is Kvelertak metal?" translates "emacs or vim?".) There's also power metal, like
Machinae Supremacy and
Dragonforce, and so on.
Although splitting hairs about culture tags is always a dubious endeavor, "gothic" doesn't own "dark and gloomy". "Gothic metal", to the extent that it means anything (which is not a large extent even by microgenre standards), means "metal reminiscent of other gothic music" - which could be as much about image as anything else.
Ruyan is clearly not gothic, but
Therion probably is. It's like how
Turmion Kätilöt is industrial metal - it's combinatoric.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 6:03 pm
by Raphael
Nortaneous wrote: ↑Wed Nov 19, 2025 5:57 pm
Although splitting hairs about culture tags is always a dubious endeavor, "gothic" doesn't own "dark and gloomy". "Gothic metal", to the extent that it means anything (which is not a large extent even by microgenre standards), means "metal reminiscent of other gothic music" - which could be as much about image as anything else.
Ah, thank you.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 8:33 am
by Raphael
Got back home from a first preliminary meeting feeling the waters for a possible therapy. I think it went really well. The therapist doesn't seem to have anything against me. And she comes across as friendly, competent, reasonable, and thoughtful. Not at all like some kind of guru type or psychopathic manipulator type, of which there are, unfortunately, way too many working in mental health over here.
The only serious problem is that it'll be some time until she has space for half-way regular sessions in her timetable. But that was to be expected, what with the supply/demand ratio for mental health and other medical services in this part of the world.
A smaller problem is that she works some distance away from me, but I think I can handle that. Today was my longest and most serious use of public transportation in a while.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 8:34 am
by WeepingElf
That's good news indeed.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 8:35 am
by Raphael
WeepingElf wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 8:34 am
That's good news indeed.
Thank you!
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 9:07 am
by Travis B.
Good to hear.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 9:22 am
by Ares Land
Glad to hear that, too!
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 10:00 am
by Lērisama
Ich freue mich darüber.¹
¹ Not sure if that's the ideomatic thing to say here, but it is a thing I can say
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 11:17 am
by WeepingElf
I have gotten rid of a number of problems in Old Albic by removing a phonological rule. That rule shortened unaccented long vowels, and it made more trouble than sense. When I realized that neither such languages as Latin or Greek, nor Quenya have such a rule, I wondered why Old Albic should have it, and abandoned it. Wow!
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 11:52 am
by Travis B.
WeepingElf wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 11:17 am
I have gotten rid of a number of problems in Old Albic by
removing a phonological rule. That rule shortened unaccented long vowels, and it made more trouble than sense. When I realized that neither such languages as Latin or Greek, nor Quenya have such a rule, I wondered why Old Albic should have it, and abandoned it. Wow!
Is Old Albic stress-timed, and how strong is the stress accent in it? If Old Albic is stress-timed and has a strong stress accent shortening unaccented long vowels makes sense, but if it were, say, mora-timed that would not make sense.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:01 pm
by Raphael
Thank you to the rest of you, too!
Lērisama wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 10:00 am
Ich freue mich darüber.¹
¹ Not sure if that's the ideomatic thing to say here, but it
is a thing I can say
Ich freue mich darüber or
Ich freu' mich darüber are fine. Other possibilities would be
Das freut mich,
Das freut mich sehr, or
Das freut mich wirklich sehr.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:36 pm
by Lērisama
Raphael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:01 pm
Thank you to the rest of you, too!
Lērisama wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 10:00 am
Ich freue mich darüber.¹
¹ Not sure if that's the ideomatic thing to say here, but it
is a thing I can say
Ich freue mich darüber or
Ich freu' mich darüber are fine. Other possibilities would be
Das freut mich,
Das freut mich sehr, or
Das freut mich wirklich sehr.
Vielen dank! Ich habe vergessen, dass das Subjekt von
freuen nicht nur eine Person sein kann.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 1:17 pm
by Travis B.
Lērisama wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:36 pm
Raphael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:01 pm
Thank you to the rest of you, too!
Lērisama wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 10:00 am
Ich freue mich darüber.¹
¹ Not sure if that's the ideomatic thing to say here, but it
is a thing I can say
Ich freue mich darüber or
Ich freu' mich darüber are fine. Other possibilities would be
Das freut mich,
Das freut mich sehr, or
Das freut mich wirklich sehr.
Vielen dank! Ich habe vergessen, dass das Subjekt von
freuen nicht nur eine Person sein kann.
Ich bin mit
Das freut mich bekannt, aber ich hatte von
Ich freue mich darüber nicht gewusst.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 2:45 pm
by Raphael
Travis B. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 1:17 pm
Lērisama wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:36 pm
Raphael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:01 pm
Thank you to the rest of you, too!
Ich freue mich darüber or
Ich freu' mich darüber are fine. Other possibilities would be
Das freut mich,
Das freut mich sehr, or
Das freut mich wirklich sehr.
Vielen dank! Ich habe vergessen, dass das Subjekt von
freuen nicht nur eine Person sein kann.
Ich bin mit
Das freut mich bekannt, aber ich hatte von
Ich freue mich darüber nicht gewusst.
OK, now I'm completely confused about things I've known and done and said for my whole life. How on Earth does any of this make sense? How could I ever manage it to figure out and memorize and get used to this stuff?
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 2:50 pm
by Travis B.
Raphael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 2:45 pm
Travis B. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 1:17 pm
Lērisama wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 12:36 pm
Vielen dank! Ich habe vergessen, dass das Subjekt von
freuen nicht nur eine Person sein kann.
Ich bin mit
Das freut mich bekannt, aber ich hatte von
Ich freue mich darüber nicht gewusst.
OK, now I'm completely confused about things I've known and done and said for my whole life. How on Earth does any of this make sense? How could I ever manage it to figure out and memorize and get used to this stuff?
Do natlangs ever truly "make sense" at the end of the day?
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 2:57 pm
by Raphael
Travis B. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 2:50 pm
Do natlangs ever truly "make sense" at the end of the day?
Well, they usually
feel like they make perfect sense if you've used them for your entire life. Until you start seriously
thinking about them. At which point you might well stop understanding how they could ever have made sense to you.
Re: Happy things thread!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 3:30 pm
by WeepingElf
Travis B. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 11:52 am
WeepingElf wrote: ↑Thu Nov 20, 2025 11:17 am
I have gotten rid of a number of problems in Old Albic by
removing a phonological rule. That rule shortened unaccented long vowels, and it made more trouble than sense. When I realized that neither such languages as Latin or Greek, nor Quenya have such a rule, I wondered why Old Albic should have it, and abandoned it. Wow!
Is Old Albic stress-timed, and how strong is the stress accent in it? If Old Albic is stress-timed and has a strong stress accent shortening unaccented long vowels makes sense, but if it were, say, mora-timed that would not make sense.
I never got this "stress-timed"/"syllable-timed"/"mora-timed" thing, but the Old Albic accent rule is essentially the same as in Latin, and as the Latin accent rule is essentially "the penultimate mora before the last syllable gets the accent", I guess it is mora-timed, but I don't know.