Re: Linguistic Miscellany Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:38 am
How is the surname Nortje actually pronounced in Afrikaans? Cricket commentators are anglicising it as /nɔːˈkiːə/ or similar.
Both my parents were born in South Africa and know a bit of Afrikaans, so I asked them. The consensus seems to be that it’s most probably /nortʃiə/, with /norkiə/ also a possibility. But Afrikaans orthography is ambiguous between the two pronunciations, so I won’t know which pronunciation is correct unless I manage to find a video in Afrikaans which mentions him by name.anteallach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:38 am How is the surname Nortje actually pronounced in Afrikaans? Cricket commentators are anglicising it as /nɔːˈkiːə/ or similar.
Proto-Japonic *e *o have to be reconstructed to handle Ryukyuan.
Sure, why not - Mandarin and Burmese both have onset /jw/ clusters.By the way, whats up with yo2? Do we believe that there really was a labialized version of /yo/? That one has been tough for me to accept.
Oh, I thought that's something that only German has.
I tried to look up more. I didn't understand much, except that modalities are one type of satsadverbial.Ser wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:10 pmSatsadverbial is probably a term that's particular to Swedish linguistics... Judging by the table and the examples, it sounds like it might encompass any basic adverb that can appear in that specific slot. In French grammar, only a few basic adverbs and pronouns can interrupt a compound verb (je l'ai toujours aidé, il n'a rien vu). Maybe Swedish has something similar with its satsadverbial.
Hmm, I think this is like morphologically motivated rather than semantically motivated, if that makes any sense. Some languages would just treat Melodifestivalen as an object. But in Swedish se på (lit. "see on") is one of these idiomatic verb+preposition compounds, whatever they're called, and that causes weird things in the syntax.Ser wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:10 pm"Complement clause" usually refers to a subordinate sentence that serves as an argument (subject or object) of a verb. A prepositional phrase doesn't normally count as a complement clause at all.Why is "på Melodifestivalen" an adverbial and not a complement? It begins with a preposition, but I don't see why that matters.
Meanwhile, the term "adverbial" normally includes adverbs (when used as adjuncts of time, place, manner, attitudes of the speaker towards the information, evidentiality, etc.), prepositional phrases (when they express similar things: "[relaxed] as always", "during X", "from X", "[nowhere] at all", "with utmost sincerity"...), and subordinate clauses (idem: "when I...", "because you...", "if he...", "although she...", "so that we...").
It could still be an Asian import, but aimed at English-speaking countries, but with packaging designed by people whose English is lacking. After all, just about any native English-speaker would get connotations from the word cock that are quite different from those likely intended here.Pabappa wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:28 pm https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com ... L1000_.jpg <--- "COCK Flavoured soup mix" .... its not like this is some Asian import, ...the packaging is in English and in English only. I dont get it. Why "cock" when "chicken" would do? Is there a difference? Perhaps there is, because the company seems to also sell a chicken-flavoured one, but still, it's not clear what the difference is or why they felt the need to use that word.
Grace is the Goya of the Caribbean. It probably doesn't have the same connotations there.Pabappa wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:28 pm https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com ... L1000_.jpg <--- "COCK Flavoured soup mix" .... its not like this is some Asian import, ...the packaging is in English and in English only. I dont get it. Why "cock" when "chicken" would do? Is there a difference? Perhaps there is, because the company seems to also sell a chicken-flavoured one, but still, it's not clear what the difference is or why they felt the need to use that word.
Thanks!bradrn wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:08 amBoth my parents were born in South Africa and know a bit of Afrikaans, so I asked them. The consensus seems to be that it’s most probably /nortʃiə/, with /norkiə/ also a possibility. But Afrikaans orthography is ambiguous between the two pronunciations, so I won’t know which pronunciation is correct unless I manage to find a video in Afrikaans which mentions him by name.anteallach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:38 am How is the surname Nortje actually pronounced in Afrikaans? Cricket commentators are anglicising it as /nɔːˈkiːə/ or similar.
Not a clue. I know very little about Afrikaans: all I know about this particular topic is that when a word ends in the diminutive suffix ⟨-tjie⟩ (or possibly ⟨-tje⟩), it’s pronounced with /k/.anteallach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:23 pmThanks!bradrn wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:08 amBoth my parents were born in South Africa and know a bit of Afrikaans, so I asked them. The consensus seems to be that it’s most probably /nortʃiə/, with /norkiə/ also a possibility. But Afrikaans orthography is ambiguous between the two pronunciations, so I won’t know which pronunciation is correct unless I manage to find a video in Afrikaans which mentions him by name.anteallach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:38 am How is the surname Nortje actually pronounced in Afrikaans? Cricket commentators are anglicising it as /nɔːˈkiːə/ or similar.
How did Afrikaans end up with this orthographic ambiguity for <tj>?
I thought -tje was Dutch and -tjie was Afrikaans. But then proper names are so very often exceptions in any case.
As I said, I don’t know Afrikaans. I don’t know if ⟨-tje⟩ even is a diminutive, or if it’s just a set of letters at the end of a word which happens to resemble the diminutive.
A question about flap elision. Is it less likely to occur in uncommon or technical words like "rhotic"? I'm guessing so, but then again I don't have flap elision in my speech.Travis B. wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:08 pm When I listen for it, examples of what I'd call flap elision are very easy to find - for instance, the person on the message on the phone for my daughter's orthodontist's office pronounces dental as [tɜ̃ːɤ̯]. Likewise, linguoboy at least observes that this is a common phenomenon in at least NAE. Yet I have not seen the least bit of reference to this phenomenon aside from what linguoboy has said. Why?
Not in my experience; the main limiters on it from what I can tell is that it tends to occur immediately after a stressed syllable when the following syllable is unstressed, and in particular that it cannot occur in two syllables in a row.Space60 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:15 pmA question about flap elision. Is it less likely to occur in uncommon or technical words like "rhotic"? I'm guessing so, but then again I don't have flap elision in my speech.Travis B. wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:08 pm When I listen for it, examples of what I'd call flap elision are very easy to find - for instance, the person on the message on the phone for my daughter's orthodontist's office pronounces dental as [tɜ̃ːɤ̯]. Likewise, linguoboy at least observes that this is a common phenomenon in at least NAE. Yet I have not seen the least bit of reference to this phenomenon aside from what linguoboy has said. Why?
That language has a sound a little more distinctive than /v/:
It's from Proto-Polynesian *l and *r. (Cf. Rennellese *l > ŋg.)The phoneme g is a voiced "non-aspirated" uvular affricate. Schooling (1981:49) says, "The term 'non-aspirated' is used to indicate that even though there is some frication, there is no breathiness."