Re: Amusing Language Names
Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:51 am
Has anyone mentioned Bats yet?
Personally, I'm tempted to say this depends on the specific Indic script in question, although that's probably for completely silly reasons, tbh.dɮ the phoneme wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 11:04 pmI think this depends on whether conjuncts are considered single graphemes or not. My intuition is to say that they are, but I'm not sure what the consensus in the Indic-script-using world is.
Khalkha would definitely work at least in Malayalam. Saposa would probably work, too, as long as you consider പ്പോ one character instead of 2-4.zompist wrote: ↑Thu May 27, 2021 5:13 pm (re Malayalam)
Which leads to the question— which languages have names that would be palindromic in an Indic script? That is, which are palindromic at the syllable level?
Despite CV-only patterns being very common in language names, this turns out to be quite rare.
Boringly, there are two-syllable reduplications: Fefe, Bebe, Gogo, Mimi, Sisi, Roro...
I think these count— Bembe, Mesme, Khalkha— as the middle consonant would have to be represented with a virama (vowel-canceling diacritic).
I was about to give up when I found one nice three-syllable name: Saposa. But I may have missed some!
That would be pronounced [beˈmɯbe]. [ˈbembe] would be ബെംബെ or perhaps even ബെമ്പെ.
What is weird about that? These are common in Indic scripts...
This is a matter of spelling? I thought that was just phonology.and making their use or non-use a matter of spelling.
Maybe this is just a distinction without a difference to me. What difference does it make whether the half-forms are placed below the consonant or to its left or right? They are still half-forms.Most Brahmic scripts subordinate the subsequent consonants of the cluster, with the exception of a couple of light-weight letters that float to the top and allow the next consonant to take the base position.
?Similarly, most Brahmic scripts are open to the idea of multiple vowels in an akshara