Frislander wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 7:42 pm
Cantiga de Santa Maria 193: Sobelos fondos do mar
-----
I will admit I'm not too familiar with most of RVW's work beyond the classics, with one exception - the Tuba Concerto, now that's a delightful little gem.
I think also one might be tempted to put Britten into that same category, although he appears to have been more consistently aligned with the avant-garde throughout his life, whereas RVW and DSCH only seem to have drifted there in their later years.
I don't know the tuba concerto...
I would put Britten in a different category, yes.
Interestingly, DSCH was actually a keen avant-gardist all his life - I think more so early on than late on, actually. Unfortunately for him, he was denounced by Pravda on the personal command of Stalin, who had attended
Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District and had not enjoyed his evening. He was forced to recant his 'formalist' impulses, and withdrew his 4th symphony from performance, while Lady Macbeth was effectively banned. The same year, most of his friends and family, and many of his colleagues, were either exiled to labour camps in Siberia or simply shot, so he had good reasons for obeying the national guidelines on compositional style. He was again denounced by Zhdanov after the war. Much of his published music becomes less listenable to in his later years, because Stalin had died and the Terror was over (indeed, some of the works published later had been written in secret earlier on).
It's a great historical irony, really. As an avantgardist, he'd have been just another among many. It's the edge between academia and popularism, and the satirical-political purposes to which he employed the ambiguities of this liminal area, that define the Shostakovich we know. The fourth symphony, that at least at the time he considered his masterpiece, is now rarely played at all, whereas the fifth symphony, written grudgingly to secure public and official approval, is considered one of the greatest symphonies of the century...