Page 83 of 134
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 7:13 am
by bradrn
jal wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 2:15 am
Mi don tahn cata 4 a Obit Ya. Nes: cata 5.
I've finished translating chapter 4 of The Hobbit. Next: chapter 5.
Ērachəzīnəwāt! Thēkrəzəꞵinɨŋ?
Congratulations! May we see it?
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:30 am
by jal
bradrn wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 7:13 amCongratulations! May we see it?
Bles yu, an yu kan! :) Im
de ya.
JAL
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:44 pm
by Emily
Rounin Ryuuji wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:07 pm
之間 在れず?
いま あれず?
Ima arezu?
[iˑꜜmɐ̞ ɐ̞ˑꜜɾ̪e̞.z̪ʉᵝ]
this.interval COPULA.NEGATIVE
It isn't (one) now?
No, ela est nu una acumulaciona van ciangiri van sonas i ciartas van declinacionas van nómini.
No, right now it's a collection of sound changes and noun declension charts.
Rounin Ryuuji wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:07 pm
「いだ」とう とらんちいみ𛀁゙は語 語ゑる辞を 手でず 何為 ほひ?
「いだ」とう とらんちいみ𛀁゙はいふ いふゑるけとうを たでず えだゑ ほひ?
"Ida" to Transimiliya-iyu iyeru kyotō tadezu edayo hoi?
[iˑꜜdɐ̞ t̪ʰo̞ᵝ t̪ʰɾ̪ɐ̞̃ɴ.s̪iꜛmᶣiˑꜜʎi.jɐ̞ iˑꜜjyᵝ iꜛje̞ˑꜜɾ̪ʉᵝ c͡çʰi̯o̞ᵝˑꜜt̪ʰo̞ᵝː t̪ʰɐ̞ˑꜜd̪e̞.z̪ʉᵝ e̞ˑꜜd̪ɐ̞ꜜjo̞ᵝ xo̞ᵝˑꜜ(w)i]
"no" QUOTATIVE Transemilia.LANGUAGE say.ADNOMINALword.ACCUSATIVE what.reason(=why) INTERROGATIVE-PARTICLE
"Why doesn't Transemilian have a word for "No"?"
Untzu saguir „si“ en transemiliano require man lo verbo repetir, i untzu „no“ saguir negue man lo verbo.
In Transemilian, you say "yes" by repeating the verb or "no" by negating it.
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 4:31 pm
by quinterbeck
Emily wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:44 pm
Untzu saguir „si“ en transemiliano require man lo verbo repetir, i untzu „no“ saguir negue man lo verbo.
In Transemilian, you say "yes" by repeating the verb or "no" by negating it.
Ad Reima meid.
- Ad
- PROP
- Reima
- Leima
- m-eid
- way-same
Leima does the same thing.
"Na donen omeoreon?"
- Na
- POL
- don-en
- PST:EXP-2s
- omeor-eon
- see-nat.sg
"Did you see it?"
"Dona" -
"I did"
"Don" - lit.
"did"
"Dona leo" -
"I didn't"
"Don reo" - lit.
"didn't"
"Leo" - lit.
"not"
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 5:06 pm
by Rounin Ryuuji
quinterbeck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 4:31 pm
"Leo" - lit.
"not"
Maiz c'êt on mot qui veut dicir « non » , n'êt-il ?
[mɛː s̪ɛː͜ t̪õː mo ki vøː d̪i's̪iɾ̪ | nõː | nɛː͜ t̪ij]
"But that's a word for 'no', isn't it?"
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:38 am
by quinterbeck
Rounin Ryuuji wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 5:06 pm
Maiz c'êt on mot qui veut dicir « non » , n'êt-il ?
[mɛː s̪ɛː͜ t̪õː mo ki vøː d̪i's̪iɾ̪ | nõː | nɛː͜ t̪ij]
"But that's a word for 'no', isn't it?"
Nnn, oi wainen ano…
Hmm, you may be right...
Weid, arde hehude:
But, these are formal:
"Dona" - "I did"
"Dona leo" - "I didn't"
Geo armo yemag:
And these are casual:
"Don" - lit. "did"
"Don reo" - lit. "didn't"
"Leo" - lit. "not"
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 10:21 pm
by Travis B.
Khåamwo Väakh rhômytäfäam.
[xʷɒmwo vʲæx ʁɤꜜmɨtʰæfʲæm]
/xʷam=wə vʲax ʁə́m-ɨ-tʰa-fʲam/
people.A=GEN tongue.B change-3.SG.B-1.SG-around
I am changing up Khåamwo Väakh.
Dzu tsanâqhuwo vála qháxaäne.
[dzʷu tsʰaꜜnɑχuwo βaːꜜla χaːꜜxæɲe]
/dzʷɨ tsʰána=χɨ=wə βáːla χáː-xa-ɲə/
3.SG.B.PROX develop=GERUND=GEN distance.C possess-3.SG.C-3.SG.B
It has a way to go.
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:10 pm
by Travis B.
Rounin Ryuuji wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 5:06 pm
quinterbeck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 4:31 pm
"Leo" - lit.
"not"
Maiz c'êt on mot qui veut dicir « non » , n'êt-il ?
[mɛː s̪ɛː͜ t̪õː mo ki vøː d̪i's̪iɾ̪ | nõː | nɛː͜ t̪ij]
"But that's a word for 'no', isn't it?"
Tsá zuv dzu väkh fërángëkwo väkhsy ngågokha ngilät'a sowåkhavazi.
[tsʰaːꜜ zʷuβ dzʷu vʲæx ɸəraːꜜŋəkʰwo vʲæxsɨ ŋʷɒɡʷoxa ŋiꜜʎætʼa sowɒxaβæʑi]
/tsʰáː zʷɨβ dzʷɨ vʲax ɸəráːŋəkʰ=wə vʲax=sɨ ŋʷaɡʷə-xa ŋɨ́ʎa-tʼa səwa-xa-βa-ʑɨ/
WH 3.SG.C.DIST 3.SG.B.PROX tongue.B Frank=GEN tongue.B=ELA exist-3.SG.C difference.C-DEF.SG equal-3.SG.C-3.SG.C-WH
What is the difference between this language and French?
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:52 pm
by Travis B.
P'äziji fërángëkwo väkh p'äziji nifonwo väkh ngågonånsôqhuwo fäk'ûqhût'a söwåmata.
[pʼæꜜʑiji ɸəraːꜜŋəkʰwo vʲæx pʼæꜜʑiji ɲiɸonʷwo vʲæx ŋʷɒɡʷonʷɒnɕɤχuwo fʲækʼɯχɯtʼa ɕøꜜwɒmatʰa]
/pʼáʑɨ-jɨ ɸəráːŋəkʰ=wə vʲax pʼáʑɨ-jɨ ɲɨɸənʷ=wə vʲax ŋʷaɡʷə-nʷan-ɕə-χɨ=wə fʲakʼɨ-χɨ-tʼa ɕə́wa-ma-tʰa/
other-3.SG.B Frank=GEN tongue.B other-3.SG.B Nihon=GEN tongue.B exist-RECIP-3.PL.B-GERUND.A=GEN think-GERUND.A-DEF.SG amuse-3.SG.A-1.SG
The thought of alternate French and alternate Japanese existing together amuses me.
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:25 pm
by Rounin Ryuuji
Travis B. wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:10 pm
Tsá zuv dzu väkh fërángëkwo väkhsy ngågokha ngilät'a sowåkhavazi.
[tsʰaːꜜ zʷuβ dzʷu vʲæx ɸəraːꜜŋəkʰwo vʲæxsɨ ŋʷɒɡʷoxa ŋiꜜʎætʼa sowɒxaβæʑi]
/tsʰáː zʷɨβ dzʷɨ vʲax ɸəráːŋəkʰ=wə vʲax=sɨ ŋʷaɡʷə-xa ŋɨ́ʎa-tʼa səwa-xa-βa-ʑɨ/
WH 3.SG.C.DIST 3.SG.B.PROX tongue.B Frank=GEN tongue.B=ELA exist-3.SG.C difference.C-DEF.SG equal-3.SG.C-3.SG.C-WH
What is the difference between this language and French?
Ê~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r.
[æːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːɾ̪]
(Exaggerated pronunciation of two sounds not present in Metropolitan French.)
Il êt pour prêter mots a l'Ineshîmé, maiz...
[ij ɛː puːɾ̪ pɾ̪ɛː'teː mɔː a li.nə.ʃiː'meː mɛː]
"It exists to lend words to Ineshîmé, but..."
Li verf eint des états fourouchis.
[l̪i væɾ̪v͜ ɛ̃ː d̪ez̪͜ eː'taː fuː.ɾ̪uː'ʃis̪]
"The verbs have archaic forms."
Li nom eint des câs.
[l̪i n̪õː ɛ̃ː d̪e kɑːs̪]
"The nouns have cases."
Maiz non genres comme d'en François.
[mɛː nõː 'ʒãː.ɾ̪əz̪ kõː dãː fɾ̪ãː's̪o̯ɛːz̪]
"But not genders like those in French."
On mot êt réaul ou dei âme.
[õː mɔt̪͜ ɛː ɾ̪eː'joː uː deː jɑːm]
"A word is either concrete or abstract." (Liteally "real" or "of the mind").
Li fluer, li arbre, li chats; la merçoi, la ivoi, la mîtere
[l̪i fl̪ɥæːɾ̪ | l̪i 'aɾ̪.bɾ̪ə | l̪i ʃas̪ | l̪a mæɾ̪'s̪o̯aː | la i'vo̯aː | la miː'tæːɾ̪]
"The flower, the tree, the cat | the mercy, the idea, the mystery."
C'êt étraunge, non?
[s̪ɛːt̪͜ eː't̪ɾ̪õː.ʒə | n̪õː]
"It's strange, isn't it?"
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:18 am
by masako
ikyehuki na omyatlokon nye etla hatamua kitlamumyepua
/ikʲɛˈɦuːki na omʲaˈt͡ɫoːkon ɲe ˈɛːt͡ɫa haˈtaːmʷa kit͡ɫamuˈmʲeːpʷa/
PROX-respite-DIM 1s etch-syllable-ACC because P.3.INAN error-COM create-INCEP-redo-PFV
This weekend I have started recreating Omyatloko because it has mistakes.
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 12:17 pm
by xxx
]KläèC]æê]M]K
I(,) having-released (the) name (of) language (of) me
I have (finally) completed the name of my language
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:36 pm
by masako
بگش يمُک ديو
begesh yemuk deyú
tonight eat-1pl chicken-ACC
We ate chicken tonight,
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 2:28 am
by jal
masako wrote: ↑Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:36 pmWe ate chicken tonight
Mi-dem in it fol dis ya ifning.
We didn't eat chicken tonight.
JAL
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:23 am
by hwhatting
Wés puccan borm proité sambaté.
PRON-1PL.NOM chicken-SG.ACC eat-PAST.NONACT.1PL pass-PAST.PRTC.N.SG.LOC Saturday.SG.LOC
We ate chicken last Saturday.
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:56 am
by Rounin Ryuuji
俺れ 現日 玉子やを 食。
いみよれ けぶ たわしやを かぶ。
Imyôre kyobu tōshō kabu.
[ì.mᶣi̯ó̞ᵝː.ɾ̪è̞ c͡çʰó̞ᵝˑ.bʉ̀ᵝ t̪ʰó̞ᵝː.ɕʰò̞ᵝː kʰɐ̞́ˑ.bʉ̀ᵝ]
1sg.NOMINATIVE today sphere.child(=egg).PLURAL.ACCUSATIVE eat.PREDICATIVE
"Today, I shall eat eggs."
昕さ、庭鳷めを。
あかさ、にはづどほい゙めを。
Akasa, niyadôl myō.
[ɐ̞̀.kʰɐ̞́ˑ.s̪ɐ̞̀ | ɲí.jɐ̞̀.d̪ô̞ᵝːɫ mᶣi̯ò̞ᵝː]
tomorrow garden.fowl(=chicken) also.ACCUSATIVE
"Tomorrow, chicken."
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 4:13 am
by Emily
Ярӭшэ кра кадӭлкакя інбарбэкъюве ѕозоньве.
/'jarjɛʃɛ kra ka'djɛlkaca inbarbɛ'kjuβe dzo'zoɲβe/
['jarjɛʃɛ kɾɔ ka'djɛlkacɔ ɛnbɔrbɛ'kjuβe dzo'zoɲβe]
- ярӭшэ
- eat-PERF-PAST
- кра
- 1.SG
- кадӭлкакя
- INDEF-comrade-COM
- інбарбэкъюве
- MASS.INDEF-barbecue-ACC
- ѕозоньве
- Korean-ACC
I ate Korean barbecue with a comrade.
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2022 9:44 am
by Rounin Ryuuji
朝鮮焼ゐは いしか 在れけ?
あさざはかぼうるゐは いしか あれけ?
Asazākaboriya ishika areki?
[ɐ̞́.s̪ɐ̞́.z̪ɐ̞̀ː.kʰɐ̞́.bó̞ᵝˑ.ɾ̪ʲì.jɐ̞̀ íˑ.ɕʰì.kʰɐ̞̀ ɐ̞́ˑ.ɾ̪è̞.c͡çʰì]
dawn.placidity(=Korea?).grill-style-cooking.DEFINITE what.like(=how) copula.PAST
"How was the Korean barbecue?"
朕れ 焼ゑ宍を 忯ゑ ほひ!
いめれ かぼうるゑししいを あはるゑ ほひ!
Imere kaboreshishō âre hoi!
[íˑ.mè̞.ɾ̪è̞ kʰɐ̞̀.bó̞ᵝ.ɾ̪è̞.ɕʰíˑ.ɕʰò̞ᵝː ɐ̞́ː.ɾ̪è̞ xó̞ᵝˑ.(w)ì]
1sg.NOMINATIVE grill.meat.ACCUSATIVE like.EXCLAMATORY exclamatory-particle
"I really like grilled meats."
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2022 2:11 am
by foxcatdog
na· pabadìja·siŋe sa·s ikuino·skacy kodian kais kapalababa·oska sa·s
na· pabad(t)ì(ù)-ja·-siŋe-duna sa·s ikuin-o·ska-c(j)y kodian kais kapala-pa/ka/ba·-o(·)ska sa·s
1.sg eat-1.2-optative-to.experience NEG cook+meat+NOM-ACC korean because like-red+meat NEG
“I do not wish to try korean bbq because i don’t like red meat”
Edit: i further forgot the nominaliser and the accusative case suffix (or grade) and added a simple phonetic borrowing for korean
ti· na· kapalagala·litabe
ti· na· kapala-g(k)ala·-li/ki/ta-be(·)
but 1.sg like+fish+cut+agent
“I however am a fan of sushi”
Re: Conlang fluency thread
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2022 8:06 am
by Rounin Ryuuji
thethief3 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 2:11 am
No word for korean however
The one appearing in mine is an orthographic borrowing, not what the word would have actually been.
ti· na· kapalagala·litabe
ti· na· kapala-g(k)ala·-li/ki/ta-be(·)
but 1.sg like+fish+cut+agent
“I however am a fan of sushi”
朕れ方で 焼ゑけ 魚を 忯。
いめれがたで かぼるゑけ うをを あはる。
Imeregata de kaboreki uwô âru.
[í.mè̞.ɾ̪è̞.gɐ̞́ˑ.t̪ʰɐ̞̀ d̪è̞ kʰɐ̞́.bò̞ᵝ.ɾ̪é̞ˑ.c͡çʰì ʉ̀ᵝ.wó̞ᵝː ɐ̞́ː.ɾ̪ʉ̀]
1sg.NOMINATIVE.DIRECTION DATIVE cook.PAST fish.ACCUSATIVE. prefer.PREDICATIVE
"I prefer cooked fish myself."