Page 181 of 204
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 8:52 pm
by Glass Half Baked
If you're concerned that starting from Old Japanese and applying cat sound changes yields Modern Japanese, why not just start from Modern Japanese?
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 11:59 am
by linguistcat
Glass Half Baked wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 8:52 pm
If you're concerned that starting from Old Japanese and applying cat sound changes yields Modern Japanese, why not just start from Modern Japanese?
Because I'm looking at cat youkai in Edo Period, and I wanted to start with cat spirits that came to Japan in the Heian Period. But looking at a future Japanese spoken by cat youkai could be fun too.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2025 7:44 am
by Glass Half Baked
OK, well then if the cats just magically show up a thousand years ago, why must they start speaking Old Japanese, and not their own language? Or a para-Japanese conlang based on some hypothetical pre-Old-Japanese?
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2025 12:10 pm
by Travis B.
Glass Half Baked wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 7:44 am
OK, well then if the cats just magically show up a thousand years ago, why must they start speaking Old Japanese, and not their own language? Or a para-Japanese conlang based on some hypothetical pre-Old-Japanese?
And there has been work on reconstructing Proto-Japonic...
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2025 12:15 pm
by Raphael
I don't think linguistcat needs a better justification for conlanging choices than "I want it that way".
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2025 5:18 pm
by Travis B.
Raphael wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 12:15 pm
I don't think linguistcat needs a better justification for conlanging choices than "I want it that way".
Agreed -- there is no need to apply supposed 'reason' to the linguistics of cat youkai.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:00 pm
by linguistcat
Travis B. wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 5:18 pm
Raphael wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 12:15 pm
I don't think linguistcat needs a better justification for conlanging choices than "I want it that way".
Agreed -- there is no need to apply supposed 'reason' to the linguistics of cat youkai.
This but also the cat youkai did derive from Chinese cat spirits, so maybe I should focus more on Middle Chinese, although I don't really want to do the amount of research I'd feel necessary to be satisfied, so Old Japanese is a good starting place for me. While there is work on Proto-Japonic and Pre-Old Japanese, we just don't know as much about them as the language that was actually written down in some form.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:20 pm
by Travis B.
linguistcat wrote: ↑Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:00 pm
Travis B. wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 5:18 pm
Raphael wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 12:15 pm
I don't think linguistcat needs a better justification for conlanging choices than "I want it that way".
Agreed -- there is no need to apply supposed 'reason' to the linguistics of cat youkai.
This but also the cat youkai did derive from Chinese cat spirits, so maybe I should focus more on Middle Chinese, although I don't really want to do the amount of research I'd feel necessary to be satisfied, so Old Japanese is a good starting place for me. While there is work on Proto-Japonic and Pre-Old Japanese, we just don't know as much about them as the language that was actually written down in some form.
Well Middle Chinese is actually rather well-researched by this point, and is much better-defined than Old Chinese, which are there are far more questions about. Of course, there is still the argument that the inventory defined by people such as Baxter is merely
categories based off the Qieyun and like rather than an actual phonology...
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2025 11:04 pm
by bradrn
Travis B. wrote: ↑Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:20 pm
Of course, there is still the argument that the inventory defined by people such as Baxter is merely
categories based off the Qieyun and like rather than an actual phonology...
As I recall, this is the perspective taken by Baxter & Sagart themselves.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2025 2:51 am
by Man in Space
Preliminary attempts at a native Kgáweq’ script, based on the one Xander Vedejas created for me years ago.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:09 am
by WeepingElf
Looks good!
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2025 6:39 am
by quinterbeck
Man in Space wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 2:51 am
Preliminary attempts at a native Kgáweq’ script, based on the one Xander Vedejas created for me years ago.
I like it! Interested to see how vowels or other marking combine
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:11 pm
by linguistcat
As a tangent to my last statement and conlanging vent, am I right that you could take a diphthong and pretty much turn it into a vowel somewhere between the two as a pretty simple sound change?
Because if so this has simplified some things for me greatly. If not, what would you say the general rule is for diphthong -> single vowel?
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:37 pm
by Travis B.
linguistcat wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:11 pm
As a tangent to my last statement and conlanging vent, am I right that you could take a diphthong and pretty much turn it into a vowel somewhere between the two as a pretty simple sound change?
Because if so this has simplified some things for me greatly. If not, what would you say the general rule is for diphthong -> single vowel?
The general rule for a diphthong changing to a monophthong is that you don't have to justify changing it to any vowel between its start and end points, its start and end points included, with the rounding of either endpoint.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:41 am
by linguistcat
Travis B. wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:37 pm
linguistcat wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:11 pm
As a tangent to my last statement and conlanging vent, am I right that you could take a diphthong and pretty much turn it into a vowel somewhere between the two as a pretty simple sound change?
Because if so this has simplified some things for me greatly. If not, what would you say the general rule is for diphthong -> single vowel?
The general rule for a diphthong changing to a monophthong is that you don't have to justify changing it to any vowel between its start and end points, its start and end points included, with the rounding of either endpoint.
Awesome. I have some work to do on Middle Chinese real quick

It only took me about 20 years to gain a basic intuition for sound changes I guess. Thanks for verifying what I was thinking.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2025 12:43 am
by foxcatdog
The Amarin grammatical component *na has had quite the history going from a particle used exclusively to link verbal components, to one exclusively used to link noun components and full circle. It serves two functions in Middle Amarin.
*a) In possessive nominalisation it links the pronoun to the verb
*b) Indicates the location where an action happens.
In addition it has also degraded and combined with verbal elements to form new directional suffixes as well as degraded to form possessive suffixes on nouns.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2025 12:51 am
by bradrn
Man in Space wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 2:51 am
Preliminary attempts at a native Kgáweq’ script, based on the one Xander Vedejas created for me years ago.
A few questions:
- I second quinterbeck’s question — how do the vowels work?
- What writing implements do the Kgáweq’ use? What would this look like when handwritten?
- The aesthetic reminds me quite strongly of the Aurebesh cipher developed for Star Wars. Was this intentional?
(And also, tangentially: what font did you use for the Latin labels? I like it, yet it doesn’t look like your usual choice of TT Marxiana…)
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2025 2:57 pm
by jal
bradrn wrote: ↑Sat Jun 07, 2025 12:51 amI second quinterbeck’s question — how do the vowels work?
Why would vowels be needed?
JAL
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2025 7:03 pm
by malloc
Recently I have been experimenting with number systems for one of my projects, in particular a combination of sexagesimal and duodecimal. For instance, one would express the number 2025 as something like two-dozen-nine sixties and three-dozen nine. Admittedly this system is rather more complicated than pure duodecimal and it seems difficult to explain why it would evolve in the first place or persist long term. Then again, plenty of ancient Near Eastern cultures used a similarly messy sexagesimal system for thousands of years and we still have traces of it today in our timekeeping.
Re: Conlang Random Thread
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2025 11:17 pm
by bradrn
jal wrote: ↑Sat Jun 07, 2025 2:57 pm
bradrn wrote: ↑Sat Jun 07, 2025 12:51 amI second quinterbeck’s question — how do the vowels work?
Why would vowels be needed?
Yes, that’s one possible answer to my question — that vowels are unwritten. But I’d like Man in Space to confirm that, if so!
malloc wrote: ↑Sat Jun 07, 2025 7:03 pm
Recently I have been experimenting with number systems for one of my projects, in particular a combination of sexagesimal and duodecimal. For instance, one would express the number 2025 as something like two-dozen-nine sixties and three-dozen nine. Admittedly this system is rather more complicated than pure duodecimal and it seems difficult to explain why it would evolve in the first place or persist long term. Then again, plenty of ancient Near Eastern cultures used a similarly messy sexagesimal system for thousands of years and we still have traces of it today in our timekeeping.
Note that a lot of premodern cultures only really need a means of counting to 10. (For instance, only numbers 1–10 are reconstructable to PIE.) Above that point, there is a lot of variation in counting systems — I don’t think sexagesimal needs any special justification.