Page 3 of 7

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:23 am
by Qwynegold
Karch wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:37 am a ax b d dz e ee f ff g h hh hhy hy i ii j k kk l m n o oo p pp s sh ss ssh t tj ts tt tts u uu v y z · ʻ ◌̣

/p pː b θ tː d ts tːs dz ʨ ʥ x kː ɡ ʔ/ <p pp b t tt d ts tts dz tj dj k kk g ·>
/ɸ ɸː β s sː z ʂ ʂː ɕ ɕː ħ ħː/ <f ff v s ss z sh ssh hy hhy h hh>
/m n ɭ j/ <m n l y>

/i u ɛ ɔ ɑ ə/ <i u e o ax a>
/iː uː æː ɒː/ <ii uu ee oo>
That's an interesting trick, replacing the short plain plosives with fricatives. And you did an unexpected thing with the vowels too. :)
Karch wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:37 am/ˀC ʔV/ <C̣ Ṿ>
Preglottalization...? Is that a thing?

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:25 am
by Qwynegold
bradrn wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2020 5:48 pm(As for Qwynegold’s romanization, I don’t think I’d be able to come up with anything more sensible than Karch’s solution.
Allright, I'll give the solution.
More: show
The underdot marks stress (on the first letter of the syllable), and ʻ marks that a word is unstressed, which can only happen on monosyllabic words. A stressed monosyllabic word is unmarked.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:37 pm
by bradrn
Qwynegold wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:19 am
bradrn wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2020 6:02 am
Dafuq?
Latin letter omega. It’s one of my favourite letters, but no-one seems to use it. (Maybe because it’s so obscure that even dedicated Unicode fonts don’t support it?)

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:07 pm
by Knit Tie
Doublepost, sorry.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:11 pm
by Knit Tie
Knit Tie wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:07 pm
bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 1:51 am
Knit Tie wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 1:06 am
Those are actually supposed to be the same exact language :V. I've included both romanisations as a puzzle of sorts to help people deduce the phonology.
Oh! Well, in that case, I obviously got it wrong. But I can’t see the solution… could you tell me what it was?

Anyway, here’s another challenge:

⟨a b c̣ c d e f g gö h ȟ ḥ ɛ i ĩ j k ḳ kö ḳö l m n o p ṗ q q̇ r s š t ṭ u ü v w x xö x̌ y z ž⟩

(Hint: Any letters which look like they have been placed ‘out of order’ are placed there deliberately…)
The solution's quite simple, actually: voiced stops b d̪ d ɖ g simply lenite to β ɾ̪ ɾˠ ɽ ɣ in most environments. What remains are two alspirated-lenis true plosive series and voicing contrast in fricatives.

Anyway, your challenge!

/a b ts’ ts d e f g gʷ h ʕ ħ ɛ i ɪ dʒ k k’ kʷ kʷ’ l m n o p p’ q q’ r s ʃ t t’ u y v w x xʷ ɣ j z ʒ/

How’s that?

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 10:47 pm
by bradrn
Knit Tie wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:11 pm
bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 1:51 am

Oh! Well, in that case, I obviously got it wrong. But I can’t see the solution… could you tell me what it was?

Anyway, here’s another challenge:

⟨a b c̣ c d e f g gö h ȟ ḥ ɛ i ĩ j k ḳ kö ḳö l m n o p ṗ q q̇ r s š t ṭ u ü v w x xö x̌ y z ž⟩

(Hint: Any letters which look like they have been placed ‘out of order’ are placed there deliberately…)
The solution's quite simple, actually: voiced stops b d̪ d ɖ g simply lenite to β ɾ̪ ɾˠ ɽ ɣ in most environments. What remains are two alspirated-lenis true plosive series and voicing contrast in fricatives.

Anyway, your challenge!

/a b ts’ ts d e f g gʷ h ʕ ħ ɛ i ɪ dʒ k k’ kʷ kʷ’ l m n o p p’ q q’ r s ʃ t t’ u y v w x xʷ ɣ j z ʒ/

How’s that?
Here’s the issues I can see:
  • ⟨h ȟ⟩ were meant to be /ɣ ʁ/; ⟨x̌⟩ was /χ/ (as in Americanist tradition)
  • ⟨ɛ⟩ was actually consonantal /ʕ/ (this was what the ‘out of order’ hint was referring to)
  • ⟨p t c k q ṗ ṭ c̣ ḳ q̇⟩ were meant to be aspirated and unaspirated rather than pulmonic and ejective.
  • ⟨c⟩ was meant to be /tʃ/ rather than /ts/
  • ⟨ü⟩ was meant to be /ʉ/ rather than /y/
But apart from those comparatively minor issues, it looks like you got it almost entirely correct! I’m particularly impressed you figured out that ⟨-ö⟩ was labialisation.

(Also, I think you quoted your post rather than editing it. Could you delete the duplicate post?)

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:27 am
by Birdlang
Ok since no ones put a new one up, I’ll put Birdish’s romanization
a b c ç d e é f g ǧ h ȟ i j ĵ k l ĺ ľ m n ŋ ń o ó ŏ p r ř s t u ú û ŭ v w x y z ʒ ʻ ə

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:17 am
by Qwynegold
bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:37 pm
Qwynegold wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:19 am
bradrn wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2020 6:02 am
Dafuq?
Latin letter omega. It’s one of my favourite letters, but no-one seems to use it. (Maybe because it’s so obscure that even dedicated Unicode fonts don’t support it?)
Huh. I can see the letter just fine, but when I look at Deja Vu Sans in Character Map, that code point (U+A7B6, U+A7B7) is not included. And I have no font with a wider range.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 4:24 pm
by bradrn
Qwynegold wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:17 am
bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:37 pm
Qwynegold wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:19 am

Dafuq?
Latin letter omega. It’s one of my favourite letters, but no-one seems to use it. (Maybe because it’s so obscure that even dedicated Unicode fonts don’t support it?)
Huh. I can see the letter just fine, but when I look at Deja Vu Sans in Character Map, that code point (U+A7B6, U+A7B7) is not included. And I have no font with a wider range.
Yes, exactly. Oddly enough, it turns out that on Windows, Arial and Times new Roman support several characters which many other dedicated Unicode fonts do not include. These characters include ⟨ɋ⟩, ⟨ꞷ⟩, and even ⟨‽⟩. Of course, the range differs with the font: despite the name, Junicode actually supports surprisingly few characters, while Gentium Plus has many which even DejaVu doesn’t.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:27 pm
by bradrn
Birdish:

/m n ɲ ŋ/ ⟨m n ń ŋ⟩
/p t k ʔ/ ⟨p t k ʻ⟩
/b d g/ ⟨b d g⟩
/ts tʃ dz dʒ/ ⟨c ç ʒ j⟩
/f s ʃ χ h/ ⟨f s x ȟ h⟩
/v z ʒ ʁ/ ⟨v z ĵ ǧ⟩
/r j w l ʎ/ ⟨r y w l ľ⟩

/a e ə ɤ o i ɯ u/ ⟨a e ə ŏ o i ŭ u⟩
/eː oː ɯː uː/ ⟨é ó û ú⟩
/r̩ l̩/ ⟨ř ĺ⟩

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:54 am
by Birdlang
bradrn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:27 pm Birdish:

/m n ɲ ŋ/ ⟨m n ń ŋ⟩
/p t k ʔ/ ⟨p t k ʻ⟩
/b d g/ ⟨b d g⟩
/ts tʃ dz dʒ/ ⟨c ç ʒ j⟩
/f s ʃ χ h/ ⟨f s x ȟ h⟩
/v z ʒ ʁ/ ⟨v z ĵ ǧ⟩
/r j w l ʎ/ ⟨r y w l ľ⟩

/a e ə ɤ o i ɯ u/ ⟨a e ə ŏ o i ŭ u⟩
/eː oː ɯː uː/ ⟨é ó û ú⟩
/r̩ l̩/ ⟨ř ĺ⟩
Got some of it right
Actually the nasals and stops are right other than the affricates, the others are
/ʦ ʧ ʣ ʤ/ ç c ʒ ĵ
/ɸ β s z ʃ ʒ x~h ɣ/ f v s z x j ȟ ǧ
/ɾ r j ɰ l ʎ/ r ř y w l ĺ
/ɮ/ ľ

Will do the vowels later.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2020 6:07 am
by bradrn
Birdlang wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:54 am
bradrn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:27 pm Birdish:

/m n ɲ ŋ/ ⟨m n ń ŋ⟩
/p t k ʔ/ ⟨p t k ʻ⟩
/b d g/ ⟨b d g⟩
/ts tʃ dz dʒ/ ⟨c ç ʒ j⟩
/f s ʃ χ h/ ⟨f s x ȟ h⟩
/v z ʒ ʁ/ ⟨v z ĵ ǧ⟩
/r j w l ʎ/ ⟨r y w l ľ⟩

/a e ə ɤ o i ɯ u/ ⟨a e ə ŏ o i ŭ u⟩
/eː oː ɯː uː/ ⟨é ó û ú⟩
/r̩ l̩/ ⟨ř ĺ⟩
Got some of it right
Actually the nasals and stops are right other than the affricates, the others are
/ʦ ʧ ʣ ʤ/ ç c ʒ ĵ
/ɸ β s z ʃ ʒ x~h ɣ/ f v s z x j ȟ ǧ
/ɾ r j ɰ l ʎ/ r ř y w l ĺ
/ɮ/ ľ

Will do the vowels later.
Wow, it looks like I got more right than I expected! And I even got the most difficult bits mostly correct. (I struggled particularly with the afficates.) It looks like:
  • I swapped ⟨c⟩ and ⟨ç⟩, and ⟨j⟩ and ⟨ĵ⟩
  • I did /ʁ/ instead of /ɣ/ for ⟨ǧ⟩ (but there’s not much difference between those two anyway)
  • I did /w/ instead of /ɰ/ for ⟨w⟩, and /ɸ β/ instead of /f v/ for ⟨f v⟩, which I think were reasonable errors to make
  • I had absolutely no idea what to do with ⟨ř ĺ⟩, so I just made them into syllabic consonants; those were actually /r ʎ/, with ⟨r ľ⟩ being /ɾ ɮ/. I don’t think I could reasonably have figured out that last one, but I really should have figured out ⟨r ř⟩.
Anyway, thanks for telling me how I did; this is definitely one of the most interesting romanization challenges (either normal or reverse) I’ve done on this board! Now I want to know how I did on the vowels — I found those fairly tricky as well…

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:31 am
by Xwtek
<a b c c' č č' d e g h i j k kh k' kw kwh kw' l ɬ m n o r s š t th t' tɬ tɬ' u w x xw z ø>

The vowel letter may carry an acute accent, grave accent (which is usually replaced by acute accent except in dictionary), and ogonek. The ogonek is independent of accent. The orthography is far from phonemic, as it distiguishes a phone that is actually allophonic.. This is also the same orthography as one of my conlang.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2020 1:50 pm
by Birdlang
bradrn wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 6:07 am
Birdlang wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:54 am
bradrn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 5:27 pm Birdish:

/m n ɲ ŋ/ ⟨m n ń ŋ⟩
/p t k ʔ/ ⟨p t k ʻ⟩
/b d g/ ⟨b d g⟩
/ts tʃ dz dʒ/ ⟨c ç ʒ j⟩
/f s ʃ χ h/ ⟨f s x ȟ h⟩
/v z ʒ ʁ/ ⟨v z ĵ ǧ⟩
/r j w l ʎ/ ⟨r y w l ľ⟩

/a e ə ɤ o i ɯ u/ ⟨a e ə ŏ o i ŭ u⟩
/eː oː ɯː uː/ ⟨é ó û ú⟩
/r̩ l̩/ ⟨ř ĺ⟩
Got some of it right
Actually the nasals and stops are right other than the affricates, the others are
/ʦ ʧ ʣ ʤ/ ç c ʒ ĵ
/ɸ β s z ʃ ʒ x~h ɣ/ f v s z x j ȟ ǧ
/ɾ r j ɰ l ʎ/ r ř y w l ĺ
/ɮ/ ľ

Will do the vowels later.
Wow, it looks like I got more right than I expected! And I even got the most difficult bits mostly correct. (I struggled particularly with the afficates.) It looks like:
  • I swapped ⟨c⟩ and ⟨ç⟩, and ⟨j⟩ and ⟨ĵ⟩
  • I did /ʁ/ instead of /ɣ/ for ⟨ǧ⟩ (but there’s not much difference between those two anyway)
  • I did /w/ instead of /ɰ/ for ⟨w⟩, and /ɸ β/ instead of /f v/ for ⟨f v⟩, which I think were reasonable errors to make
  • I had absolutely no idea what to do with ⟨ř ĺ⟩, so I just made them into syllabic consonants; those were actually /r ʎ/, with ⟨r ľ⟩ being /ɾ ɮ/. I don’t think I could reasonably have figured out that last one, but I really should have figured out ⟨r ř⟩.
Anyway, thanks for telling me how I did; this is definitely one of the most interesting romanization challenges (either normal or reverse) I’ve done on this board! Now I want to know how I did on the vowels — I found those fairly tricky as well…
The vowels were OK
/i y~ʉ u ʊ e ɤ o ə ɛ ʌ ɔ a/ i û ú u é ŏ ó ə e ŭ o a
Length is marked by a macron, doubling or the letter h.
Macron is not used on the normally accented vowels
All long ones are: ī ů ü ū ë õ ö ĕ ē ũ ō ā

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:08 pm
by bradrn
Xwtek wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:31 am The orthography is far from phonemic, as it distiguishes a certainly phonemic.
I don’t understand this sentence. What do you mean by ‘it distinguishes a certainly phonemic’? Specifically, if it helps you, the problem is that you are using an adjective (namely ‘phonemic’) as if it were a noun, and then you’re modifying it with ‘certainly’, which is an adverb which cannot modify nouns.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:06 am
by Xwtek
bradrn wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:08 pm
Xwtek wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:31 am The orthography is far from phonemic, as it distiguishes a certainly phonemic.
I don’t understand this sentence. What do you mean by ‘it distinguishes a certainly phonemic’? Specifically, if it helps you, the problem is that you are using an adjective (namely ‘phonemic’) as if it were a noun, and then you’re modifying it with ‘certainly’, which is an adverb which cannot modify nouns.
Fixed. Thanks.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:55 am
by bradrn
Thanks Xwtek! I assume that was just a typo then. Here’s my solution for your romanization:

⟨a e i o u y ø⟩ /a e i o u y ø/
I honestly don’t have a clue what the accents represent, but I suspect that the ogonek marks nasalisation.

⟨m n⟩ /m n/
⟨b d g⟩ /b d ɡ/
⟨t k kw⟩ /t k kʷ/
⟨th kh kwh⟩ /tʰ kʰ kʷʰ/
⟨tʼ kʼ kwʼ⟩ /tʼ kʼ kʷʼ/
⟨c č cʼ č tɬ tɬʼ⟩ /ts tsʼ tʃ tʃʼ tɬ tɬʼ/
⟨s z š x xw h⟩ /s z ʃ x xʷ h/
⟨r j w l ɬ⟩ /r j w l ɬ/

I’m guessing that the allophone here is ⟨b⟩: out of all the stops, it’s the only one with no voiceless counterpart. Alternatively, if that isn’t correct ⟨c⟩ and ⟨č⟩ could be allophones, as well as ⟨cʼ⟩ and ⟨čʼ⟩. Or the allophone could possibly be ⟨š⟩.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:46 am
by Xwtek
This is actually Sakha my conlang. I want to edit the scratchpad, but I had no further material. (It seems like I'm stuck in phonology phase)

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:27 pm
by Birdlang
Another orthography
This time for Pigeonese
a á b ƀ c č ȼ d đ e é ē ḗ f g ɣ ǥ h ḫ ḥ ḩ i í j ǰ k ꝁ l ľ ł m n ň ŋ o ó ō ṓ ơ ớ p ꝑ q ꝗ r ř ṟ s š ꞩ ṡ t ŧ u ú ư ứ v ʋ w ẃ ẇ ꟃ y ý ẏ z ž ƶ ʔ
Sorry for the kitchen sink, it has a pretty big phonology.
Edit: added one.
Edit again: the character next to w-acute is anglicana w. It has nearly no font support.

Re: Reverse Rominazation Challenge Thread, v2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:36 pm
by bradrn
Birdlang wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:27 pm Another orthography
This time for Pigeonese
a á b ƀ c č ȼ d đ e é ē ḗ f g ɣ ǥ h ḫ ḥ ḩ i í j ǰ k ꝁ l ľ ł m n ň ŋ o ó ō ṓ ơ ớ p ꝑ q ꝗ r ř ṟ s š ꞩ ṡ t ŧ u ú ư ứ v ʋ w ẃ ẇ ꟃ y ý ẏ z ž ƶ ʔ
Sorry for the kitchen sink, it has a pretty big phonology.
Edit: added one.
This must be one of the most amazing orthographies I’ve ever seen. And what font are you using? I can’t see ꟃ, and I can’t find any fonts which support it either. But according to Wikipedia it looks like this:
More: show
Image
(can’t figure out how to make the picture smaller, sorry, so I’m putting it in an expandable block)

According to https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2017/17238- ... cana-w.pdf, it’s an old version of ⟨w⟩.

Anyway, I think I managed to figure out something reasonable for this:

⟨m n ň ŋ⟩ /m n ɳ ŋ/
⟨b ƀ d đ g ǥ q ꝗ⟩ /b ɓ d ɗ ɡ ɠ gʷ ɠʷ/
⟨p ᵽ t ŧ k ꝁ ȼ ʔ⟩ /p pʼ t tʼ k kʼ kʷ ʔ/
⟨c č j ǰ⟩ /ts tʂ dz dʐ/
⟨f s š ṡ ꞩ ḫ ḥ h ḩ⟩ /f s ʂ ʃ ɕ x ħ h ɦ/
⟨ʋ v z ž ƶ ɣ⟩ /β v z ʐ ʑ ɣ/
⟨r ř ṟ⟩ /r r̥ ɻ/
⟨l ł ľ⟩ /l ɬ ʎ/
⟨ẇ ꟃ ẏ⟩ /ʍ w j/

⟨a e ơ o ē ō y w i ư u⟩ /a e ɤ o eː oː ɪ ʊ i ɯ u/
Acute accent represents high tone, no accent represents low tone

But I do have a couple of questions about this:
  1. What does the line across the stops mean?
  2. What do ⟨ḩ⟩ and ⟨ꟃ⟩ mean?