Page 22 of 22
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
by TomHChappell
I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!
…
What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
….
Thanks!
This seems very interesting to me, even though I understand less of it that than what I don’t understand!
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
by bradrn
TomHChappell wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!
…
What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:07 pm
by TomHChappell
bradrn wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Thanks! I’ll ask Twin Aster to confirm.
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:44 am
by Man in Space
TomHChappell wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:07 pm
bradrn wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Thanks! I’ll ask Twin Aster to confirm.
bradrn is correct. Those are the initials for the series of glyphs—
CC has seven vowels listed in the customary order /a ɛ ə ɔ i ɨ u/.
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2025 6:36 pm
by Man in Space
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2025 3:59 am
by Man in Space
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:41 am
by Man in Space
Re: Twin Aster
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 2:15 am
by bradrn
Man in Space wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:56 pm
In the form in which it was principally promulgated back in the day, Caber logograms (
toqitŭvadar1 or
qanvan2) were originally made using a small brush (
ŭmŭ means both 'paint' and 'write'); however, they originally designed from scoring on wood (because druids, after all). They weren't the only ones to discover writing
3, but they
were the first, around the XXI C.
BC.
Returning to this point: I rediscovered my old calligraphy brush. It’s a very bad one (complete with some kind of squeezy internal paint source that smells
really terrible for some reason), and on top of that I’m awful at brush calligraphy, but I’ve at least proven to my own satisfaction that bottom-to-top writing is practical with a brush. The shapes of these radicals are rather intricate, but after a few goes I at least managed to write
this one successfully.