Page 22 of 22

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
by TomHChappell
I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!

What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
….
Thanks!
This seems very interesting to me, even though I understand less of it that than what I don’t understand!

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
by bradrn
TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm I do not understand the two-capital-letter boldface labels you give to your “series”.
(Some are three-capital-letters. Some are one capital letter. Some are one uppercase + one lowercase letter.)
Not all of them correspond to notes in the white-on-black table in your signature.
So I’m not sure I understand even those!

What do your series’s labels mean?
Or, maybe, what do you mean by “series”?
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:07 pm
by TomHChappell
bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Thanks! I’ll ask Twin Aster to confirm.

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:44 am
by Man in Space
TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:07 pm
bradrn wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:52 pm
TomHChappell wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
IIRC these are phonetic series, so I believe they’re just phonemes: the ‘RG series’ would be used in words containing ⟨rg⟩, the ‘QG series’ in words containing ⟨qg⟩, and so on.
Thanks! I’ll ask Twin Aster to confirm.
bradrn is correct. Those are the initials for the series of glyphs—CC has seven vowels listed in the customary order /a ɛ ə ɔ i ɨ u/.

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2025 6:36 pm
by Man in Space
MV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

BV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

NV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2025 3:59 am
by Man in Space
DV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

QV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

JV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

GV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

All the two-consonant onsets are accounted for; only the triconsonantal onsets are left. We're in the home stretch now.

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:41 am
by Man in Space
RDV series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

RDG series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

XT series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CTR series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CRN series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

CTG series

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

And there we have it. I might make alternative/multiple phonetic radicals for some of these later, but other than that…here we are.

Re: Twin Aster

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 2:15 am
by bradrn
Man in Space wrote: Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:56 pm In the form in which it was principally promulgated back in the day, Caber logograms (toqitŭvadar1 or qanvan2) were originally made using a small brush (ŭmŭ means both 'paint' and 'write'); however, they originally designed from scoring on wood (because druids, after all). They weren't the only ones to discover writing3, but they were the first, around the XXI C. BC.
Returning to this point: I rediscovered my old calligraphy brush. It’s a very bad one (complete with some kind of squeezy internal paint source that smells really terrible for some reason), and on top of that I’m awful at brush calligraphy, but I’ve at least proven to my own satisfaction that bottom-to-top writing is practical with a brush. The shapes of these radicals are rather intricate, but after a few goes I at least managed to write this one successfully.