So - what do we do about economic growth?

Topics that can go away
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4604
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: So - what do we do about economic growth?

Post by Raphael »

Ares Land wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:34 am
zompist wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 9:38 pm Probably. Was there some epoch before Sturgeon's Law was passed?

I do think some cities are prettier than others. But past glories weren't always appreciated at the time, because people thought real elegance had disappeared 300 years previous. Plus, the ugliest old buildings have been torn down and all the horse shit removed.
Sentiments have evolved. Here in France everybody, and especially the tourists, loves the quaint renaissance/medieval neighborhoods, small towns and villages. But go back a century of so and almost everybody thought they were gloomy and unsanitary.
And keep in mind that the buildings whom many people these days see basically as the worst places to live in the richer parts of the world - those concrete towers filled with apartments for poor people - were originally meant to be architectural utopias.
Ares Land
Posts: 3041
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:35 pm

Re: So - what do we do about economic growth?

Post by Ares Land »

Raphael wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 8:03 am And keep in mind that the buildings whom many people these days see basically as the worst places to live in the richer parts of the world - those concrete towers filled with apartments for poor people - were originally meant to be architectural utopias.
Absolutely... Though judging from contemporary remarks, people found them awful back then too! It seems the utopia was mainly in the eyes of the architect.

(If anything, things turned out better than people feared. I used to live in what's probably the ugliest tower in Paris. It was far from utopian, but the building had its good points.)
User avatar
WeepingElf
Posts: 1519
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: So - what do we do about economic growth?

Post by WeepingElf »

Ares Land wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 8:45 am
Raphael wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 8:03 am And keep in mind that the buildings whom many people these days see basically as the worst places to live in the richer parts of the world - those concrete towers filled with apartments for poor people - were originally meant to be architectural utopias.
Absolutely... Though judging from contemporary remarks, people found them awful back then too! It seems the utopia was mainly in the eyes of the architect.

(If anything, things turned out better than people feared. I used to live in what's probably the ugliest tower in Paris. It was far from utopian, but the building had its good points.)
In East Germany at least, they were very popular, but that was because they were pretty much the only kind of residence available to common people that offered modern comfort - no detached homes, no modernized prewar developments. And even in West Germany, they were the most attractive kind of housing affordable to low-income households because detached homes were expensive and most prewar developments weren't modernized yet.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
Nortaneous
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am

Re: So - what do we do about economic growth?

Post by Nortaneous »

Ares Land wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:34 am
Nortaneous wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:18 pm Older cities are better in the US because they're from before we forgot how to make cities. Everything in Northern Virginia is post-1950 and rich. It's atrocious. How much of the appeal of degrowth is that economic growth has outstripped good taste?
The degrowth movement is more of a left-wing, even far-left thing and that's more of a conservative sentiment. So not as such. But there is some interest in degrowth in some conservative circles.
I said Boston is a better place to live than Loudoun County. That's the furthest thing from a conservative sentiment that the English language can express.
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
Post Reply