Gahalese scratchpad: Noun declensions and morphophonology
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 11:33 pm
Hi folks--long-time lurker and occasional poster, here and on the CBB. Lost access to my old account a while back so I made a new one. Figured I'd post a little bit about my most recent project, Gahalese, which I've been doddering on for a minute.
Nouns in Gahalese are marked for case and number. There is a singular and a plural, and a nominative and oblique...but the system is a bit defective, as the oblique singular and nominative plural have completely identical affixes (-i), and for some nouns the oblique plural is identical too. There are three declensions, named by the form of the oblique plural.
The first declension, or the -ezhi declension is the most common. As you can imagine, the affix for the oblique plural is -ezhi.
sim --> simezhi
river-NOM.SG --> river-OBL.PL
The second declension, or the -e declension, is the 2nd most common.
mono --> monoe
sweater-NOM.SG --> sweater-OBL.PL
The third declension, or the -i declension, is the least common, though it frequently surfaces in commonly used inanimates, including nearly all agricultural products.
fu --> fui
olive-NOM.PL --> olive-obl.pl
Diachronically these declensions are rooted in Gahalese's ancestor, Old Guneyic. Old Guneyic marked the plural in most cases with *-i, as in the present language, and the dative (the ancestor of the oblique) with *-e. The two coincided as /e.i/ [eji] in most forms (the ancestors of the modern -ezhi declension). However, there was another declension, the ancestor of most -e declension nouns, where the plural form was underlyingly *-/j/. This surfaced as [i.] after consonants in the nominative plural and as [j] after vowels (in the other declension it formed a hiatus). The latter feature was mostly elided in the nominative plural due to analogy, but in the dative plural it was preserved as -[ej] which eventually became -[e]. The -i conjugation comes from the relics of the ancient accusative *-y which were preserved in very common words, especially but not exclusively inanimates--as in Spanish, the dative started out used for animate direct objects.
Finally, it's worth noting two common morphophonemic alternations which occur here.
The first is velar palatalization. The phonemes /k g/ surface as [ʃ ʒ] <sh zh> before front unrounded vowels (aka basically all number and case affixes.)
pagog --> pagozhi
seaweed-NOM.SG --> seaweed-OBL.SG
mek --> meshi
heir-NOM.SG --> heir.NOM.PL
kinomik --> kinomishezhi
line-NOM.SG --> line-OBL.PL
sanzhek --> sanzheshe
polar.bear-NOM.SG --> polar.bear-OBL.PL
The one exception is the 3rd conjugation, where the oblique plural and only the oblique plural does not induce palatalization (this is due to it historically being a front rounded vowel).
oleg --> olegi
cucumber-NOM.SG --> cucumber-OBL.PL
The other morphophonemic alternation of note is high vowel lowering. In some words, word-final [i. u] in the nominative plural becomes [e o] after affixes.
idu --> idoi
chant-NOM.SG --> chant-OBL.SG
This is not true of all words ending in high vowels; one just has to know.
Nouns in Gahalese are marked for case and number. There is a singular and a plural, and a nominative and oblique...but the system is a bit defective, as the oblique singular and nominative plural have completely identical affixes (-i), and for some nouns the oblique plural is identical too. There are three declensions, named by the form of the oblique plural.
The first declension, or the -ezhi declension is the most common. As you can imagine, the affix for the oblique plural is -ezhi.
sim --> simezhi
river-NOM.SG --> river-OBL.PL
The second declension, or the -e declension, is the 2nd most common.
mono --> monoe
sweater-NOM.SG --> sweater-OBL.PL
The third declension, or the -i declension, is the least common, though it frequently surfaces in commonly used inanimates, including nearly all agricultural products.
fu --> fui
olive-NOM.PL --> olive-obl.pl
Diachronically these declensions are rooted in Gahalese's ancestor, Old Guneyic. Old Guneyic marked the plural in most cases with *-i, as in the present language, and the dative (the ancestor of the oblique) with *-e. The two coincided as /e.i/ [eji] in most forms (the ancestors of the modern -ezhi declension). However, there was another declension, the ancestor of most -e declension nouns, where the plural form was underlyingly *-/j/. This surfaced as [i.] after consonants in the nominative plural and as [j] after vowels (in the other declension it formed a hiatus). The latter feature was mostly elided in the nominative plural due to analogy, but in the dative plural it was preserved as -[ej] which eventually became -[e]. The -i conjugation comes from the relics of the ancient accusative *-y which were preserved in very common words, especially but not exclusively inanimates--as in Spanish, the dative started out used for animate direct objects.
Finally, it's worth noting two common morphophonemic alternations which occur here.
The first is velar palatalization. The phonemes /k g/ surface as [ʃ ʒ] <sh zh> before front unrounded vowels (aka basically all number and case affixes.)
pagog --> pagozhi
seaweed-NOM.SG --> seaweed-OBL.SG
mek --> meshi
heir-NOM.SG --> heir.NOM.PL
kinomik --> kinomishezhi
line-NOM.SG --> line-OBL.PL
sanzhek --> sanzheshe
polar.bear-NOM.SG --> polar.bear-OBL.PL
The one exception is the 3rd conjugation, where the oblique plural and only the oblique plural does not induce palatalization (this is due to it historically being a front rounded vowel).
oleg --> olegi
cucumber-NOM.SG --> cucumber-OBL.PL
The other morphophonemic alternation of note is high vowel lowering. In some words, word-final [i. u] in the nominative plural becomes [e o] after affixes.
idu --> idoi
chant-NOM.SG --> chant-OBL.SG
This is not true of all words ending in high vowels; one just has to know.