Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Natural languages and linguistics
Post Reply
vegfarandi
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:52 am

Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by vegfarandi »

Which one is the best for a good overview of the language?

Main options I've found are:

Introduction to Sahidic Coptic: A New Coptic Grammar
by Thomas O Lambdin

An Elementary Coptic Grammar Of The Sahidic Dialect
by C. C. Walters

A Coptic Learning Grammar (Sahidic) (Subsidia et Instrumenta Linguarum Orientis)
by Johanna Brankaer

An Introductory Coptic Grammar. Sahudic Dialect.
by J. Martin. PLUMLEY

Has anybody read any of these and have a recommendation?
Duriac Threadhe/him
Ares Land
Posts: 3012
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:35 pm

Re: Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by Ares Land »

I was hoping someone more qualified would chime in...

I suppose you have access to the Language Pile: Leyton's Coptic Grammar seems pretty good.
Plumley's is a bit too short and synthetic to my tastes. It's basically a long list of tables with laconic comments, and it's a bit hard to follow. The good thing with Leyton is that he writes quite a bit on syntax.

(I'd love to get into the various stages of Egyptian... but for some reason the grammars are awfully hard to read.)
fusijui
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:51 pm

Re: Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by fusijui »

What Ares Land said.

What I find forbidding about Coptic & Egyptian language in general is that 95% of it is written not from a linguistic perspective, or even a general old-school philological one, but a specialized Egyptological one, which I've never been able to make myself digest. It makes Sinology feel breathtakingly cosmopolitan and modern -- practically 20th-century, even! ;)

So I can't help, but am also watching this thread in hope of some guidance.
Kuchigakatai
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by Kuchigakatai »

fusijui wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:40 pmWhat I find forbidding about Coptic & Egyptian language in general is that 95% of it is written not from a linguistic perspective, or even a general old-school philological one, but a specialized Egyptological one, which I've never been able to make myself digest. It makes Sinology feel breathtakingly cosmopolitan and modern -- practically 20th-century, even! ;)
I've heard Antonio Loprieno's Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction (1995) is great as an introduction to the whole of Egyptian for linguistics-minded types (and also as an introduction to linguistics for Egyptologists...), although I've been told the pronunciation reconstructions it has are wild and bad. But it looks decent when it comes to syntax and the morphology spelled with consonants.

This year James P. Allen, the author of the textbook Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs (1st ed. 1999, 3rd ed. 2014), also published a reconstruction of Egyptian in its various stages this year, Ancient Egyptian Phonology (2020). He also has a grammar of Old Egyptian based on Unas's pyramid's texts from the 24th century BC, A Grammar of the Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts, volume 1: Unis (2017), which is also interesting because:
I have gradually come to the realization that our analysis of the ancient Egyptian language—Old and Middle Egyptian in particular, and later stages to a lesser extent—has been warped by the unconscious biases that our translations impose on the material. We have, for example, divided the single written form of the Late Egyptian sḏm.f into two inflected forms, preterite and prospective/subjunctive, because it regularly has one or the other meaning. [...] Accordingly, the present study makes no assumptions about grammatical categories that are not adequately represented in the written data. Readers familiar with more traditional studies of Egyptian grammar will find a number of innovations here.
Sadly, following standard practice for grammars of ancient literary languages, the book has no glosses. sometimes I think of writing a Latin grammar myself... if only to be the first to write one with glosses.........

Note: I don't claim to have read any of these books with any good level of care/attention.
bradrn
Posts: 6241
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by bradrn »

Kuchigakatai wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 8:22 pm
fusijui wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:40 pmWhat I find forbidding about Coptic & Egyptian language in general is that 95% of it is written not from a linguistic perspective, or even a general old-school philological one, but a specialized Egyptological one, which I've never been able to make myself digest. It makes Sinology feel breathtakingly cosmopolitan and modern -- practically 20th-century, even! ;)
I've heard Antonio Loprieno's Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction (1995) is great as an introduction to the whole of Egyptian for linguistics-minded types (and also as an introduction to linguistics for Egyptologists...), although I've been told the pronunciation reconstructions it has are wild and bad. But it looks decent when it comes to syntax and the morphology spelled with consonants.
Really? As it happens, I’m reading that book now after your earlier recommendation, and its reconstructed pronunciations look fairly reasonable to me (not that I would know)… do you have any more details on what’s wrong with them? (Though I can confirm that it’s accessible to linguists, not just Egyptologists.)
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Kuchigakatai
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by Kuchigakatai »

bradrn wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 10:22 pmReally? As it happens, I’m reading that book now after your earlier recommendation, and its reconstructed pronunciations look fairly reasonable to me (not that I would know)… do you have any more details on what’s wrong with them? (Though I can confirm that it’s accessible to linguists, not just Egyptologists.)
I've heard that in that book he excessively assumes the same few patterns for a too large number of words, and that assuming j and w are always /j w/ is probably unwarranted. Please note I don't know what I'm talking about; I'm not familiar with Egyptian ling at all. I'm just passing you this second-hand.
fusijui
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:51 pm

Re: Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by fusijui »

Loprieno is good, I agree (for non-Egyptologists like us, I mean), and that's really most of the 5% I had in mind in my earlier post. But it's a fairly small book that covers the entire history of Egyptian language(s), and doesn't have much to say about Coptic... it's sort of one big tease :)
vegfarandi
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:52 am

Re: Coptic Grammar recommendations?

Post by vegfarandi »

I ended up getting Lambdin's grammar. It's not a reference grammar but a teaching grammar. Thankfully my Greek reading ability is decent enough that I can get through the non-Romanized Coptic sample texts. The downside is that it might be harder to get the holistic overview I was hoping for, but the upside is that because it is meant as a beginners' grammar, it's reasonably simple.
Duriac Threadhe/him
Post Reply