Travis B. wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:36 amTalskubilos wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:10 amOn the other hand, there're quite a lot of proposed loanwords from this source, likely through the languages spoken by the farmers who colonized Europe in the Neolithic. Some of them have been borrowed more than once, thus generating doublets like the one I quoted before:
*ghebhōl- (
kephalê 'head', English
gable) ~
*kapōl-o- (Old English
hafola, Sanskrit
kapá:la-), from Semitic
*gbl- 'mountain; boundary, border' (Arabic
ʒabal 'mountain'), with a straightforawrd semantic shift.
Please actually substantiate such supposed "Wanderwörter" rather than finding words that look vaguely similar and declaring "hey! that's a Wanderwort"? Going from 'mountain' to 'head' is quite a jump unto itself.
Not really, because the head is at the top of body. But this doesn't look as Wanderwort, bur rather as loanword, either from Semitic itself or a third source.
Travis B. wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:36 amTo you
everything is a Wanderwort. Can you contemplate that the majority of IE roots, especially well-established ones like this one, are
not Wanderwörter?
I don't think this is an example of a "well-established IE root", and The apple tree is originary of Kurdistan, so the word must have originated in that region. IMHO, among the +2,000 lexical items reconstucted for PIE there are many loanwords and Wanderwörter.
Travis B. wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:36 amAlso, loans from IE daughters into Uralic are a very well-substantiated phenomenon that need not be dismissed as "Wanderwörter".
Yes, they are, but this doesn't like to be the case.
Travis B. wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:36 amTalskubilos wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:10 am
This prefix has no etymological value:
uda <
*HVmV and
udare, udari <
*HVmV-lV, with the nasal replaced by a prosthetic
d, but it's kept in
um(a)o <
*HVmV-nV.
Positing
m >
d without good reason is not a very strong argument. Unless you can show this was a common pattern in loans from IE to Basque there is no value in this argument.
In this case the source isn't IE, but I can show you an example: Greek
kamára 'vault' could be derived from
*kama-rV '(something) curved', which would give the Basque doublet
adar 'horn' and
abar 'branch'. As Paleo-Basque had no
*m in its inventory, this consonant evolved into something else of simply disappeared. In the case of
uda, udare, udari, it was replaced with a prosthetic /
d/, while
um(a)o kept it (or regenerated it) because of the following nasal.