Obenzayet

Almea and the Incatena
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Obenzayet

Post by zompist »

I finally finished the Obenzayet grammar:

https://www.zompist.com/naviu.htm

I've been working on it (well, not continuously...) for 23 years. At least my completion rate is better than that Martin fellow.
User avatar
dhok
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:39 am
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Re: Obenzayet

Post by dhok »

Question: is the historical phonology on the Proto-Eastern page still up to date? (I'm wondering about the velarization changes...e.g. the PE philology page has *tuli 'breeze' -> ʔuli, but the Obenzayet page shows the (somewhat more expected?) tˠuli.

Perhaps this isn't really so much a question about Obenzayet proper, but...would you do Eastern differently if you could go back now? My impression looking at the Proto-Eastern page these days is that a lot of the changes are a little ad-hoc.

Otherwise, I like it a lot--vaguely Semitic-ish in feel, though maybe that's just the result of the Sanskrit-style vowel collapse...
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by zompist »

I haven't updated the Eastern page (yet), and the Obenzayet page should be taken as more accurate.

As for doing things differently, sure! Though I revised both Cadinor and Verdurian extensively, I was still working backwards a lot, and that makes for some weird results. That's why I always advocate working forward from your proto-languages!

I will say that Obenzayet is about the only language that makes the proto-Eastern verbal system work. (Though if I could start over, I'd try to use more than just suffixes for verb forms. Maybe some reduplication, or Sanskrit-style single-consonant morphemes.)
bradrn
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Obenzayet

Post by bradrn »

Excellent news! I remember looking through the navbar and wondering when Naviu and Čia-Šia would come… I guess I know the answer now!

As usual for me, here’s some questions and comments:
  • What exactly makes you say that Obenzayet ‘makes the proto-Eastern verbal system work’?
  • I really like the velarised consonants! But do you think you could change their IPA transcription to the less ambiguous /pˠ bˠ tˠ dˠ cˠ ɟˠ ɫ/? (I interpret tilde as representing nasalisation, and it is defined as such in the IPA.)
  • In the same section, you say that /ɫ/ is ‘very much like the English dark l in full, only with the tongue even farther back in the mouth’. But English ‘dark l’ is just /ɫ/… why the extra instruction to pull the tongue back? Unless the Obenzayet sound is actually [ɭˠ] or something, but you never explicitly say that. (Also, this sentence would make an excellent example of the pitfalls of explaining sounds with reference to English: I have [fʊw] rather than [fʊɫ] for full.)
  • Would it be possible to have the PE→Obenzayet sound changes, as for the other Eastern languages?
  • In the ‘Morphology’ section, you say ‘irregularities are highlighted in blue’, but I can’t see any highlights anywhere. (Maybe it’s because I’m colourblind? But usually I see blue fine.)
  • You say ‘Nouns precede adjectives, genitives, numbers, demonstratives, and relative clauses’ — but what is the word order amongst those? (Unless you were implying the word order to be ‘N Adj Gen Num Dem Rel’, in which case I think you should clarify this explicitly.)
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by zompist »

To handle the easy bits for now:

* I like the vowel changes for tense in Obenzayet. It's messed up by sound change everywhere else.
* The PE > Obenzayet sound changes are already listed on the Proto-Eastern page.

I didn't do the color highlighting... I'll add that.
Kuchigakatai
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Obenzayet

Post by Kuchigakatai »

I find it amusing you sometimes post things that have been years in on-and-off preparation, probably a decade or more. But then again, when you have a 40+ year-old conworld...
In my transliteration I don't use the IPA symbols p̃ b̃ etc., but the simpler p̄ ṯ ḵ ḇ ḏ ḡ.
Those are not IPA symbols...
Adjacent to a velar or velarized consonant it fricativizes; thus ksut̃ = [kʃut̃].
I wonder, is this a left-over from an earlier version with č? [s] is already a fricative, but maybe there was [tʃ ~ ʃ] allophony involved here before, which would explain this use of "fricativizes" (as opposed to "is retracted/palatalized").
The stress rules:

Stress the last vowel of the root.
sin-ä, ait-a, gäla-ra, läl-aɫi, mirast-az
But for verbs with an infix (e.g. the past conditional), stress the infix.
läl-iz-aɫi, läl-and-amu
And if the ending starts with a long vowel, stress it.
läl-ätu, läl-and-ätu

As shown, try to make syllables end in a vowel.
It would be helpful for readers to indicate stress in those examples (sin-ä, läl-iz-aɫi, läl-ätu). I mean, as it is it's understandable, but it'd be nicely helpful. Is "try to make syllables end in a vowel" a left-over note for yourself for designing the vocab later, to remember most suffixes should ideally end in a vowel?
fusijui
Posts: 275
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:51 pm

Re: Obenzayet

Post by fusijui »

Thanks, Mark! This is a great Christmas surprise. (Like others, I first started anticipating this page nearly twentyyearsago (!!)…)
User avatar
Ketsuban
Posts: 177
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: Obenzayet

Post by Ketsuban »

Is it possible that Cuezi Arrasos is related to arats? A shared ancient loan from the Meťelyi?
User avatar
WeepingElf
Posts: 1513
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by WeepingElf »

Good stuff! Now that we have a good idea of what the Naviu branch is like, we are waiting for a Čia-Ša grammar ;)
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by zompist »

Updated the grammar.

1. I used pˠ etc. in the phonology section. The tilde is used for velarization, but it should overlay the character: p̴. This tends to look terrible, however.
2. The stress section now correctly indicates the stressed syllable. This should make sense of the comment about ending syllables in a vowel.
3. I put in the colors that were in my Word document.
4. Some minor typos are fixed.

Thanks to everyone for pointing out problems. Also, special thanks to vegfarandi for telling me about the option to embed fonts, which allowed me to use the Verdurian script extensively.
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by zompist »

Ketsuban wrote: Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:45 am Is it possible that Cuezi Arrasos is related to arats? A shared ancient loan from the Meťelyi?
That's pretty clever! I'll have to mention that in the Cuêzi lexicon.
Mornche Geddick
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: Obenzayet

Post by Mornche Geddick »

Great Christmas present, Zompist!
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4568
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: Obenzayet

Post by Raphael »

<Dad Joke Mode>
But what about the Untenzayet language?
</Dad Joke Mode>

Nevermind - anyway, thank you for all your great work!
Last edited by Raphael on Sun Dec 27, 2020 8:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
So Haleza Grise
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 6:08 am

Re: Obenzayet

Post by So Haleza Grise »

Speaking of that Martin fellow, is mäɣi a small homage?
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by zompist »

So Haleza Grise wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 2:56 pm Speaking of that Martin fellow, is mäɣi a small homage?
Yes, though inadvertently. Since I needed more words, I mined my submission for the LCS contest for creating Dothraki, years ago, to get some use out of it. I thought I'd skipped any actual Martin words, but missed that one. (Looks like he lifted it from Persian, anyway!)
Arkasas
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:26 am
Location: Look behind you

Re: Obenzayet

Post by Arkasas »

Random typo: in the introduction you've got vrazikaiz for ancestor, but everywhere else it's vraskaiz.
there's not an n
User avatar
WeepingElf
Posts: 1513
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:39 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by WeepingElf »

And about half the time when you were trying to say declension you actually wrote declination.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by zompist »

Both things fixed; thanks!
User avatar
mèþru
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 6:22 am
Location: suburbs of Mrin
Contact:

Re: Obenzayet

Post by mèþru »

Always great to see new grammars for Almea!
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť
Mornche Geddick
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: Obenzayet

Post by Mornche Geddick »

I noticed that in the Proto-Eastern grammar the word for land; xūn-s, listed in the masculine verb table, is realised as ʔün-z in the Obenzayat column, but is ḵün-z in the equivalent table on the Naviu page. Does that represent an early draft of Obenzayat, or an alternative such as Proto-Naviu or another language?
Post Reply