Code: Select all
əwaʔ
gʀɒːci
hɔⁿɟi
ʟ̠ʷɑ̃c͡çɛ
m̥ɔd͡ʒi
ŋ͡moəcːɨ
ŋojc
ŋəɫacʼ
pʰœʒe
ɟeːce
Code: Select all
əwaʔ
gʀɒːci
hɔⁿɟi
ʟ̠ʷɑ̃c͡çɛ
m̥ɔd͡ʒi
ŋ͡moəcːɨ
ŋojc
ŋəɫacʼ
pʰœʒe
ɟeːce
Yeah, this sounds more reasonable than what I have.Ketsuban wrote: ↑Sun Jan 02, 2022 1:43 am I'm not sure about ŋəɫacʼ coming from *ŋəwac - I feel like I'd expect ɫ > w rather than the other way around. That puts some strain on the idea of vowel breaking from an initial *ɔ, since you've got a lateral appearing more or less out of nowhere. Perhaps the original form was *ŋ͡mɔmɔci, with the first branch dissimilating to *ŋ͡mɔɫɔci and the second showing haplology?
Code: Select all
ɒvæʔ
gwici
ᵐbøʒi
ŋɔ̤a̯cɨ
xmɑe̯ɟ
ʍatt͡ʃɛ
Nice tree graph. What does the dashed line mean?
It means there wasn’t enough space and I was too lazy to fit it in properly.
I did mention this as a possibility earlier, but I can’t see any easy way to get there: *gʁʷɒ- to /ɟe-/ is tricky. If anything I now suspect a link to *ɣʷɑ̃c͡çi — which, now I look again should actually be *ɣʷɑ̃c͡çɛ — though that too seems a bit tricky.
It could be, I think, that the ancestral form of the form currently reconstructed as */ci/ could be */ce~t(j)e~k(j)e/
Yes, but why a dashed line instead of a normal one?
It seems unlikely, given that its most common reflex is /i/, and /c/ is unstable enough to turn into just about any palatal-ish consonant. But really it’s the /ɟe-/ part which is giving me trouble.Rounin Ryuuji wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:09 pmIt could be, I think, that the ancestral form of the form currently reconstructed as */ci/ could be */ce~t(j)e~k(j)e/
Good question.WarpedWartWars wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:10 pmYes, but why a dashed line instead of a normal one?
I expect it would be one of the [gʀʷɒci] group (it isn't far off from [gʀɒːci], in fact); the exact route of [gʀʷ] > [ɟ] is unclear — the [ʀʷ] could delabialise, and then become [j] after stops, or simply be lost, with [g] > [ɟ] being the result of assimilation to the following [c], or some sort of Satemisation. [ɒ] > [ɒː] > [æː] (possibly undergoing i-mutation) > [eː] would probably account for the vowel (the loss of [ʀʷ] at this point could also simply allow [geː] > [ɟeː], a not-uncommon shift in itself), and [i] > [e], while not as common as the other way round, is far from impossible (especially if it's assimilated to the [eː] that precedes it).bradrn wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:07 amIt seems unlikely, given that its most common reflex is /i/, and /c/ is unstable enough to turn into just about any palatal-ish consonant. But really it’s the /ɟe-/ part which is giving me trouble.Rounin Ryuuji wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:09 pmIt could be, I think, that the ancestral form of the form currently reconstructed as */ci/ could be */ce~t(j)e~k(j)e/
Code: Select all
biʃkɨ
byhkʷy
ɹʷɯç
rʷɯçɯ
racɨkʰə
cʷʰr̥ʷy
ɿcʰi
βɿcʰi
βɯ˞cʰ
ɾæce
wiːcʰi
ræjɛkʰ
frusːi
furiʃ
furyç
ruʃi
viɾɕi
vursi
wɯxkʲɯ
wɨxʲkʲɨ
ɢɒwlajʔ
kɔjlajʔ
kɔjɹɐ