Ares Land wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 11:23 am
MacAnDàil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 10:39 am
Yes, that is what Jean Twenge noticed when she compared the generation Z to previous generations at the same age:
That's probably true, but I'm not sure the problem is generational... People my age certainly come across as really anxious and worried too.
Yes, the proof is generational but the effects are probably felt across all generations currently.
Raphael wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 1:21 pm
MacAnDàil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2023 10:39 amYes, that is what Jean Twenge noticed when she compared the generation Z to previous generations at the same age:
With social media and texting replacing other activities, iGen spends less time with their friends in person – perhaps why they are experiencing unprecedented levels of anxiety, depression, and loneliness.
https://www.jeantwenge.com/igen-book-by-dr-jean-twenge/
I think you mean well, but I also think that the idea you support there leads to the
implication that all people
should always spend a lot of time with other people, and that not doing so is inherently bad, which strikes me as rather unfair towards the introverts among us. Some of us are better off having
more of our contact with other people online rather than in real life.
For me personally, the ZBB contains more people who share enough of my interests and outlook to be fun to talk to than I could probably easily find near me in real life.
The implications do not necessarily include the idea that people should always spend a lot of time with other people or that not doing is inherently bad because introverts predate smartphones by a large margin. It does however imply that 1° All things being equal otherwise, spending time in real life is preferable. There are of course other factors, as you note. You may correct me, but I tihnk you probably would like spending time with people share enough of your interests and outlook if they lived near to you. 2° when you do spend time alone, it's not deadscrolling or somesuch, it can be anny number of art or sport o whatever activities 3° when you do spend with people you like, make the most of it instead of talking to them while answering messages.
zompist wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 6:38 am$
Taleb's point was about what jobs can and can't
scale. Some can't: you can't be a surgeon, a barber, a masseur, or a CPA to a million people. You can however provide a book or a rock album to ten or a million people, and in a galactic society to a trillion. That gives the arts a vertiginous class structure, with our present ways of doing things. What I'm pointing out is that music went from non-scaleable to scaleable. Even Mozart couldn't give a concert for a million people; but a Mozart recording can be sold to that many.
It seems to me that there are degrees of sca
keenir wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 10:07 am
Newly thought:
Though, Alice Kober was a schoolteacher, and I think Derek Bickerton is one as well. Is teaching the usual 2nd job for linguists, or do i have that impression because of sampling bias: the ones I've heard of (and know the background of) held that occupation.
It's possibly to do with researchers in general: researcher jobs are often teacher-researcher ones, and linguistics is not available pre-university anywhere as far as I know.
rotting bones wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:23 am
Let me give a concrete example of how reducing energy consumption will hurt the working class: If energy becomes more expensive, then so will transportation. If transportation becomes expensive, then economies of scale will recede. If economies of scale recede, then essential goods will become drastically more expensive. This will hit workers more powerfully than any other class.
Saving the planet is important. I'd just like to do it without committing yet another genocide that gets swept under the rug.
1° If energy becomes more expensive, it could be progressive: there could even be a decrease in spending for the least users and gradually much more.
2° Energy is already becoming expensive in the UK and it's not the fault of ecologists but the same energy companies wanting to drill more oil out of the gorund for their greed.
3° There's already a genocide of Uighurs not by ecologists either, but by the Chinese dictatorship.
4° If transportation becomes more expensive, it could have kerosene taxed more than petrol.
There are enough real problems without thinking about hypothetical ones to blame on those trying solve problems.
Ares Land wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 1:21 pm
rotting bones wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:23 am
Let me give a concrete example of how reducing energy consumption will hurt the working class: If energy becomes more expensive, then so will transportation. If transportation becomes expensive, then economies of scale will recede. If economies of scale recede, then essential goods will become drastically more expensive. This will hit workers more powerfully than any other class.
Saving the planet is important. I'd just like to do it without committing yet another genocide that gets swept under the rug.
Getting back on this point...
I think one point about degrowth that is often overlooked is that it makes a lot of sense for some countries, and no sense at all in others.
Typically developing countries need economic growth and their energy consumption will increase.
In the West, though... GDP per capita in France has doubled between 1990 and 2015. As far as I can see standards of living have not significantly improved since.
As for energy consumption... Our energy use is still highly inefficient (though there have been improvements.)
In some ways cheap transportation can be damaging. No offence to Chileans or Canadians... but we don't need to import apples from Chili, or mustard from Canada.
Exactly. And part of the reason the standards of living have not improved is that a sgnificant amount of the GDP growth went to the top 1% financially. Another is that people are happier when they have enough to eat and house themselves and clothe themselves and a bit more but are necessarily massively happier with massively more money.
KathTheDragon wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:23 pm
I think you've picked up an incorrect understanding of degrowth (which I don't blame you for, I also thought this until I learned what it really is literally yesterday. The name really doesn't help at-a-glance understanding). Degrowth is not "zero or negative growth please", it's actually "stop focussing on growth for growth's sake please". The wellbeing of the people is the primary goal, and negative growth is simply an allowed development if it turns out to be beneficial, as it may well be in the West. But for the Global South, growth is undeniably a good thing for the standard of living, and degrowth would still advocate for it.
This can be a problem for 'zero waste' also: some may get the impression it is necessarily absolute zero and not tending towards zero.
hwhatting wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 9:04 am
Ares Land wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 8:11 am
Raphael wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 5:45 am
I'm a bit surprised to hear that. I would have thought France would be full of people who take pride in
not knowing anything about English.
We have those too, but that might be more typical of older generations.
I've heard all the horror stories about how the French don't talk English and prefer to leave you hanging if you don't speak French, but when I travelled there last time two years ago, I had a rather different experience with young people - they readily spoke English and even switched to English on their own accord when they noted that I had difficulties to express myself in French (it was even a bit annoying, as I actually wanted to practise my French). And that was the case even in non-urban, non-touristy parts of the country.
It is partly because such annoying switching to English in Germany that I preferred Réunion to Germany.
Ares Land wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 3:46 pm
I confirm that you'll get by perfectly fine with English in France these days.
And there was me hoping to get by without English...
Ares Land wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 3:46 pm
Mexican food never really became popular in France; that's why the word 'tacos' could be repurposed for something else entirely.
"French tacos" (for lack of a better name) are flour tortillas wrapped around an unholy quantity of meat, fries and cheese. That kind of tacos is definitely a generational thing -- kids love them but I think past 30 most everyone finds the idea revolting.
And the sauces. An unholy amount of gloopy sauces. And that's from me who likes sauces.
Ares Land wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2023 8:08 am
FWIW in some part of France
un américain is half a baguette filled with burger patties, fries, and loads of sauce. Why do they call these
americans? Was it some dude's idea of a burger before we imported burgers? Who knows?
Here in Réunion you get américain combined with &all sorts: sarcive (char siu), bouchon (local variant of Chinese dumplings) etc