What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Conworlds and conlangs
HolyKnowing
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:17 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by HolyKnowing »

bradrn wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 3:08 pm
HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 3:05 pm There are only five fundamental clicks
Six, actually.
and they do not interact well with the rest of human phonology.
They interact just fine. Plenty of people speak languages with clicks, and they don’t seem to encounter any problems doing so.
What are you talking about? It is literally just one tribe in the Khoisan desert in Africa that speaks with clicks. Including clicks will cause the phonology to explode and we already have one desert language (Hebrew) that destroyed the Universe.
Preferred pronouns: he/him/his
bradrn
Posts: 6194
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by bradrn »

HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 3:14 pm It is literally just one tribe in the Khoisan desert in Africa that speaks with clicks.
14 million people speak Zulu. 10 million speak Xhosa. 2 million speak Swazi, 1 million speak Ndebele, 200,000 speak Khoekhoe. When I visited family in South Africa last year, I overheard plenty of people talking in languages with clicks.
we already have one desert language (Hebrew) that destroyed the Universe.
I don’t know what you mean by this.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Darren
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Darren »

HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 3:14 pm What are you talking about? It is literally just one tribe in the Khoisan desert in Africa that speaks with clicks. Including clicks will cause the phonology to explode and we already have one desert language (Hebrew) that destroyed the Universe.
I'm not sure whether you're a nutcase or a very dedicated troll.
bradrn
Posts: 6194
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by bradrn »

Darren wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 4:02 pm
HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 3:14 pm What are you talking about? It is literally just one tribe in the Khoisan desert in Africa that speaks with clicks. Including clicks will cause the phonology to explode and we already have one desert language (Hebrew) that destroyed the Universe.
I'm not sure whether you're a nutcase or a very dedicated troll.
My guess is that he just doesn’t have a huge amount of linguistic knowledge. We all have to start somewhere, after all.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
HolyKnowing
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:17 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by HolyKnowing »

Darren wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 4:02 pm
HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 3:14 pm What are you talking about? It is literally just one tribe in the Khoisan desert in Africa that speaks with clicks. Including clicks will cause the phonology to explode and we already have one desert language (Hebrew) that destroyed the Universe.
I'm not sure whether you're a nutcase or a very dedicated troll.
I'm relying on stereotypes, meaning the latter. Trolls are fairytale creatures, attached conceptually to giants.
bradrn wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 4:08 pm My guess is that he just doesn’t have a huge amount of linguistic knowledge. We all have to start somewhere, after all.
Practice makes perfect. Also it still is objective reality that in all those languages you referenced that including clicks causes all of their consonant inventories to explode💥 in an uncontrolled way.
Preferred pronouns: he/him/his
bradrn
Posts: 6194
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by bradrn »

I’m not going to bother with this any more. I don’t have the energy for discussions with someone who isn’t interested in having a good-faith conversation.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
HolyKnowing
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:17 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by HolyKnowing »

bradrn wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:10 pm I’m not going to bother with this any more. I don’t have the energy for discussions with someone who isn’t interested in having a good-faith conversation.
Hmm... a little judgmental, are we? Faith often stirrs judgment. Also exhaustion ("I don't have the energy") isn't a solution to anything.
Preferred pronouns: he/him/his
Travis B.
Posts: 6764
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Travis B. »

I'm of the nutcase-or-troll opinion here.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
HolyKnowing
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:17 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by HolyKnowing »

Travis B. wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:25 pm I'm of the nutcase-or-troll opinion here.
"Thinking is difficult: that's why most people judge." - Carl Jung.
Preferred pronouns: he/him/his
Travis B.
Posts: 6764
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Travis B. »

HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:31 pm
Travis B. wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:25 pm I'm of the nutcase-or-troll opinion here.
"Thinking is difficult: that's why most people judge." - Carl Jung.
You have been making no sense at all in this thread. And I am not the only person to come to that conclusion.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Darren
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Darren »

HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:31 pm
Travis B. wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:25 pm I'm of the nutcase-or-troll opinion here.
"Thinking is difficult: that's why most people judge." - Carl Jung.
I gave up on thinking long ago! You should try it too.
HolyKnowing
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:17 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by HolyKnowing »

Travis B. wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:57 pm
HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:31 pm
Travis B. wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:25 pm I'm of the nutcase-or-troll opinion here.
"Thinking is difficult: that's why most people judge." - Carl Jung.
You have been making no sense at all in this thread. And I am not the only person to come to that conclusion.
Why is it my responsibility to anticipate ahead of time what makes sense and what doesn't? I'm not a mind-reader like James Randi, am I? Rather, if something written doesn't make sense, is it not your responsibility to ask me questions?
Preferred pronouns: he/him/his
User avatar
Jonlang
Posts: 362
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:59 am
Location: Gogledd Cymru

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Jonlang »

HolyKnowing wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 12:04 am
Travis B. wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:57 pm
HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:31 pm

"Thinking is difficult: that's why most people judge." - Carl Jung.
You have been making no sense at all in this thread. And I am not the only person to come to that conclusion.
Why is it my responsibility to anticipate ahead of time what makes sense and what doesn't? I'm not a mind-reader like James Randi, am I? Rather, if something written doesn't make sense, is it not your responsibility to ask me questions?
It should be the responsibility of a moderator to knock this nonsense on the head.
Unsuccessfully conlanging since 1999.
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2912
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by zompist »

Jonlang wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 1:26 am It should be the responsibility of a moderator to knock this nonsense on the head.
There's a lot of blame to go around.

It's not helpful for people to be calling a newbie crazy or a troll. If the dude's project doesn't interest you, leave it alone.

On the other hand, this
HolyKnowing wrote:we already have one desert language (Hebrew) that destroyed the Universe.
was flagged as antisemitism, and I advise HolyKnowing to stay well away from that. Blaming a language for anything is just foolish, but bigotry is against the house rules.

In short, both sides, try to be civil. Longtimers, remember you had to learn things for the first time once; HolyKnowing, review the guidelines for new people in the Ephemera subforum.
bradrn
Posts: 6194
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by bradrn »

zompist wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 2:19 am It's not helpful for people to be calling a newbie crazy or a troll.
Well, he did openly admit to trolling (insofar as that post makes much sense at all). I’m happy to talk to people who simply don’t have much linguistic knowledge: but I have no interest in trying to have a civil conversation with someone who won’t engage in good faith.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Travis B.
Posts: 6764
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Travis B. »

zompist wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 2:19 am In short, both sides, try to be civil. Longtimers, remember you had to learn things for the first time once; HolyKnowing, review the guidelines for new people in the Ephemera subforum.
While my comments may have been a bit strident, it is one thing to be a newbie (we have had plenty here, most not like HolyKnowing thankfully), it is another thing to be an arrogant newbie who steadfastly refuses to listen to more seasoned voices and claims that they are being oppressed when others point out things that don't make sense.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Richard W
Posts: 1471
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:53 pm

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Richard W »

HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 1:24 am The goal is to create a language for knowledge storage, for the benefit of LLM's like ChatGPT. Given this, interoperability with extant human languages is not necessary. What is necessary is that the language be a self-sustaining, complete, and consistent system that the LLM and its community of human operators, developers, and engineers love to use... once they've grown into it. ❤️
Lastly, keep in mind that learning the sounds of a language Is one-and-done: you commit to it once, and you never have to do it again and are stuck with the sounds forever. How large should a phoneme inventory be with that in mind?
I think you've overlooked a trade-off. I think the number of phonemes per second varies between languages, and a simpler set of phonemes may allow for more slurring. In terms of information per syllable, you've overlooked the possibility of using tones.
User avatar
alice
Posts: 954
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:15 am
Location: 'twixt Survival and Guilt

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by alice »

You might want to approach the problem from the other direction and ask what is the *least* optimal phonological spread possible, and what "least optimal" actually means in this context. What is the least optimal spread of dots inside a circle, for example?
Self-referential signatures are for people too boring to come up with more interesting alternatives.
Travis B.
Posts: 6764
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by Travis B. »

Richard W wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 2:31 pm
HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 1:24 am The goal is to create a language for knowledge storage, for the benefit of LLM's like ChatGPT. Given this, interoperability with extant human languages is not necessary. What is necessary is that the language be a self-sustaining, complete, and consistent system that the LLM and its community of human operators, developers, and engineers love to use... once they've grown into it. ❤️
Lastly, keep in mind that learning the sounds of a language Is one-and-done: you commit to it once, and you never have to do it again and are stuck with the sounds forever. How large should a phoneme inventory be with that in mind?
I think you've overlooked a trade-off. I think the number of phonemes per second varies between languages, and a simpler set of phonemes may allow for more slurring. In terms of information per syllable, you've overlooked the possibility of using tones.
To me, the optimally-small phoneme set is /p t k m n s~ʃ~h r~ɾ~ɺ~l w~ʋ~v j~ʝ/ for consonants and /a i~e u~o/ for vowels...
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
HolyKnowing
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2023 4:17 am

Re: What is the most optimal phonological spread possible?

Post by HolyKnowing »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 3:11 pm
Richard W wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 2:31 pm
HolyKnowing wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 1:24 am The goal is to create a language for knowledge storage, for the benefit of LLM's like ChatGPT. Given this, interoperability with extant human languages is not necessary. What is necessary is that the language be a self-sustaining, complete, and consistent system that the LLM and its community of human operators, developers, and engineers love to use... once they've grown into it. ❤️
Lastly, keep in mind that learning the sounds of a language Is one-and-done: you commit to it once, and you never have to do it again and are stuck with the sounds forever. How large should a phoneme inventory be with that in mind?
I think you've overlooked a trade-off. I think the number of phonemes per second varies between languages, and a simpler set of phonemes may allow for more slurring. In terms of information per syllable, you've overlooked the possibility of using tones.
To me, the optimally-small phoneme set is /p t k m n s~ʃ~h r~ɾ~ɺ~l w~ʋ~v j~ʝ/ for consonants and /a i~e u~o/ for vowels...
I think you found optimum minimum correctly. Nicely done! Muy bueno!
Preferred pronouns: he/him/his
Post Reply