Natural languages and linguistics
Zju
Posts: 909 Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:05 pm
Post
by Zju » Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:51 am
It may interest you to know that there are more than six vowel letters.
....no, don't tell me that <l> represents a vowel as well.
So would that be a seven vowel system? Don't know what to make out of <ukewyglhce>.
Many vowels, longish words, simple-ish syllable structure, no tones... some Bantu language?
ninja'd: Arawak? Mayan? I give up!
/j/ <j>
Ɂaləɂahina asəkipaɂə ileku omkiroro salka.
Loɂ ɂerleku asəɂulŋusikraɂə seləɂahina əɂətlahɂun əiŋɂiɂŋa.
Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ.
bradrn
Posts: 6257 Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am
Post
by bradrn » Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:51 am
Nortaneous wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:48 am
bradrn wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:48 am
Nortaneous wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:45 am
It may interest you to know that there are more than six vowel letters.
I
knew it. The more I look at it, the more certain I become that ⟨l⟩ is a vowel here.
That's one of them.
‘Stakeholders were not aligned‘ must be the understatement of the year, then.
So, it’s not Asian or Pacific, it’s definitely not Australian and unlikely to be European… from the Americas?
Yes.
South America, perchance?
Nortaneous
Posts: 1660 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am
Post
by Nortaneous » Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:52 am
Zju wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:51 am
It may interest you to know that there are more than six vowel letters.
....no, don't tell me that <l> represents a vowel as well.
So would that be a seven vowel system? Don't know what to make out of <ukewyglhce>.
The orthography is poorly described in the literature I have access to and doesn't correspond one-to-one with the modern linguistic transcription. I could be wrong, but I think there are nine and a half.
bradrn wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:51 am
‘Stakeholders were not aligned‘ must be the understatement of the year, then.
There were some policy issues.
South America, perchance?
No.
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
bradrn
Posts: 6257 Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am
Post
by bradrn » Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:57 am
Nortaneous wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:52 am
South America, perchance?
No.
It’s probably Central American, then. (By which I include countries from Mexico to Panama.)
Nortaneous
Posts: 1660 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am
Post
by Nortaneous » Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:59 am
bradrn wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:57 am
Nortaneous wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:52 am
South America, perchance?
No.
It’s probably Central American, then. (By which I include countries from Mexico to Panama.)
North.
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
bradrn
Posts: 6257 Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am
Post
by bradrn » Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:02 am
Nortaneous wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:59 am
bradrn wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:57 am
It’s probably Central American, then. (By which I include countries from Mexico to Panama.)
North.
Huh.
Well, like I said, it’s getting late here. I’ll continue on guessing tomorrow (if no-one else has got it by then).
Zju
Posts: 909 Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:05 pm
Post
by Zju » Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:18 am
Languages in the north part of NA tend to have few vowels, so could it be from California, perhaps? And languages of the east coast tend to be poorly documented.
/j/ <j>
Ɂaləɂahina asəkipaɂə ileku omkiroro salka.
Loɂ ɂerleku asəɂulŋusikraɂə seləɂahina əɂətlahɂun əiŋɂiɂŋa.
Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ.
Nortaneous
Posts: 1660 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am
Post
by Nortaneous » Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:46 am
Zju wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:18 am
Languages in the north part of NA tend to have few vowels, so could it be from California, perhaps? And languages of the east coast tend to be poorly documented.
It's not from California.
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
Zju
Posts: 909 Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:05 pm
Post
by Zju » Sun Sep 29, 2024 3:23 pm
Is it a Siouan language? Alternatively, is it a language isolate, such as Tunica, Calusa or Takelma?
It doesn't look like it has long vowels or nasal vowels.
/j/ <j>
Ɂaləɂahina asəkipaɂə ileku omkiroro salka.
Loɂ ɂerleku asəɂulŋusikraɂə seləɂahina əɂətlahɂun əiŋɂiɂŋa.
Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ.
Nortaneous
Posts: 1660 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am
Post
by Nortaneous » Sun Sep 29, 2024 3:55 pm
Zju wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 3:23 pm
Is it a Siouan language?
Yes.
To make things faster, I'll say that <d> is also a vowel.
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
bradrn
Posts: 6257 Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am
Post
by bradrn » Sun Sep 29, 2024 9:07 pm
Nortaneous wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 3:55 pm
To make things faster, I'll say that <d> is also a vowel.
This gets worse and worse.
‘Mass literacy’ suggests that this is a reasonably widely-spoken language. Crow?
fusijui
Posts: 275 Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:51 pm
Post
by fusijui » Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:02 pm
I know the answer (I think) but am not going to say, because the thread is too entertaining to cut short.
Nort is not only draining our precious cranial juices, but metabolizing them into dry humor.
Travis B.
Posts: 6853 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm
Post
by Travis B. » Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:22 pm
Nortaneous wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 3:55 pm
Zju wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 3:23 pm
Is it a Siouan language?
Yes.
To make things faster, I'll say that <d> is also a vowel.
Oh dear gawd...
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
bradrn
Posts: 6257 Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am
Post
by bradrn » Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:40 am
fusijui wrote: ↑ Sun Sep 29, 2024 10:02 pm
I know the answer (I think) but am not going to say, because the thread is too entertaining to cut short.
Please just say it and end our misery. After all, the whole point is to name the language if you think you know it…
Darren
Posts: 781 Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm
Post
by Darren » Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:40 am
Is that an /f/ I see? Is this Ofo perchance?
Unless, of course, <f> is just another vowel, taunting us with false hope
Karch
Posts: 577 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:09 am
Post
by Karch » Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:04 am
This is absolutely a Meeker orthography. As to which language it represents, after consulting a chart of Meeker orthographies I am pretty sure it's Chiwere.
Zpaf kkuñb ñvneahttiñ wqxirftvn meof ñfañhsit.
Kkuñb ñvzxirf kvtañb kkuñf ñtmeaq sfañkqeanth.
Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq.
Darren
Posts: 781 Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm
Post
by Darren » Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:07 am
Karch wrote: ↑ Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:04 am
This is absolutely a Meeker orthography. As to which language it represents, after consulting a chart of Meeker orthographies I am pretty sure it's Chiwere.
Please tell me what the <f> means
My first guess is /θ/, second /pʰ/, third idk /ĩ/
Karch
Posts: 577 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:09 am
Post
by Karch » Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:37 am
Darren wrote: ↑ Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:07 am
Please tell me what the <f> means
My first guess is /θ/, second /pʰ/, third idk /ĩ/
Your first guess is correct. Here's the first two sentences of the example transcribed according to the chart: (note that when the chart provided two alternatives, I chose the first one, so <u> is /u/, not schwa, with the sole exception being <Wdkuntl> "God", since later materials have the form <Wakanda>.)
wanoči ɛkitɛ wahsike mɛiɛ sware waminunie, hɛhe kirowe tɛnčiwa wanoči krɛkitɛ mɛgenie. itɛ wakəntɛ wawayi etawe nɛhireskoniwiri wikiɛsko: wayisčeθke rɛkitawenɛ worɛke pihči onɛonte kitawenɛ ekek, wahsike ukiwaygɛhči nɛhɛtɛreniek.
Zpaf kkuñb ñvneahttiñ wqxirftvn meof ñfañhsit.
Kkuñb ñvzxirf kvtañb kkuñf ñtmeaq sfañkqeanth.
Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq. Yvnmuq.
Nortaneous
Posts: 1660 Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am
Post
by Nortaneous » Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:52 pm
Karch wrote: ↑ Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:04 am
This is absolutely a Meeker orthography. As to which language it represents, after consulting a chart of Meeker orthographies I am pretty sure it's Chiwere.
Yes. Designed by Moses Merrill, one of Meeker's associates.
https://ioway.nativeweb.org/language/christmasstory.pdf
<f g> /N T/ - Nazareth and Bethlehem are
Nlsarig and
Pagrahim . Vowels are <a d e i l o u v y> and sometimes <w>.
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.