The left does try to address such fears by trying to slightly raise the minimum wage. This is nowhere near enough. E.g. Amazon drivers have a precarious life rushing from delivery to delivery. They feel like their soul is being sucked out. Any self-improvement they ever tried is falling by the wayside. The people who take such jobs are not qualified for much else. Politicians suspect that strong regulations on these jobs will greatly reduce the number of such jobs available, make deliveries more expensive, and be challenged by delivery company money. The only way around this problem is radical change in the way business is done.
The Post Office also has people going from house to house with deliveries, and they're unionized to secure better pay and conditions. There's no reason why Amazon delivery drivers couldn't/shouldn't be unionized too.
rotting bones wrote:To repeat myself: If the leftists in power are going to shut down any proposal for radical change, desperate people are going to let the fascists try it.
Agreed.
Ares Land wrote:When they bother to test it, opinion polls do show that far-right voters are usually happier and more satisfied with their lives than average.
This is going to be blunt, but I think it's the best way to put it: far-right voters are stupid and racist. There are no deeper sociological explanations.
I don't disagree that the *core* of fascist parties are bigoted rich people like Trump and Farage, but they wouldn't get anywhere near power if they didn't convince a bunch of less bigoted desperate poor people to vote for them.
Of course left-wing parties should enact programs that improve peoples' life... but it's not likely to help with the far-right problem.
So, you're basically saying that there's no solution.
Every country has national specifics like this. I remember seeing that America has an empathy problem. These days, kids who read Steinbeck in school think the working class protagonists are stupid and deserve the bad stuff that happens to them.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-dis ... -liberals/
https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-disturbing-thing-i-learned-studying-white-privilege-and-liberals/ wrote:However, what we found startling was that white privilege lessons didn’t increase liberals’ sympathy for poor Black people. Instead, these lessons decreased liberals’ sympathy for poor white people, which led them to blame white people more for their own poverty. They seemed to think that if a person is poor despite all the privileges of being white, there must really be something wrong with them.
Thanks for the racism and classism, neoliberalism!
I generally agree education is key.
Spoken like a true neolib! I'm pessimistic about more education, because more education alone can't fix the fact that increasingly getting an education doesn't pay off, either because the job market is so saturated with graduates that having a degree devalues the job, making it pay no better than a job that doesn't require a degree, or that it no longer guarantees that you'll even get a job in your field, because you no longer stick out, or that the cost of getting a degree (in both time and money) is so high that it negates whatever increase in pay that the job provides.
I realize that this probably won't convince you, because neolibs see ~*~ Education ~*~ as not just a way to learn how to do X, but as a way to ~*~ Become a Better Person ~*~, but this is a classist notion that must be defeated.
If your theory of education is correct, then why is society on the precipice of fascism when more people are more educated then ever before?