I just noticed the Mei grammar. Is this new? I can’t recall seeing it before, but the date is May 2023…
(Making this a new thread in case I or anyone else want to say comment further about Mei.)
(Also, hah, it’s an interesting coincidence that the Mei grammar should be dated to May, isn’t it?)
Mei
Mei
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Re: Mei
Transitive bodily actions on another person are nominative-accusative; but if they’re done on oneself (i.e. they’re reflexive), they’re ergative.
Koi tezaɣu. Tezaño.
Koi shave-past.1>3s / shave-past.ø>1s
I shaved Koi. I shaved (myself).
This looks like it might be described in terms of a middle voice from what I know of middle voices. Is that fair? There is a patient but no known/specified agent.
Koi tezaɣu. Tezaño.
Koi shave-past.1>3s / shave-past.ø>1s
I shaved Koi. I shaved (myself).
This looks like it might be described in terms of a middle voice from what I know of middle voices. Is that fair? There is a patient but no known/specified agent.
Re: Mei
Originally I was going to say ‘no’, on the basis that there would be no verbs where the putative ‘middle voice’ alternates with a non-middle form. But in fact there are: it has the effect of a passive on transitive verbs. So I guess you could call it a ‘mediopassive’, as in IE. It’s a weird one, though, because for transitive verbs it’s only passive, with no more prototypically middle meanings like reflexivity.
Another analysis is that this is a split-S system: there are some intransitive verbs where S aligns with A, and others where it aligns with O. (In Mei the latter class is small and closed; this is similar to natlangs like Arikawa.) Although there is again weirdness: usually stative verbs are prototypically S=O, but in Mei that category includes no stative verbs at all.
A third possible analysis is that these verbs really are underlyingly transitive, with a dummy subject. Such things are widely attested, as ‘involuntary state constructions’ (if you’re a Papuanist) or ‘transimpersonals’ (if you’re an Americanist). Typically these have weird subjecthood properties; I don’t know enough on subjecthood properties in Mei to comment.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)