English questions

Natural languages and linguistics
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4552
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: English questions

Post by Raphael »

Thank you, everyone!
bradrn wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2024 8:11 pm
I did simplify a bit. My understanding of the rule is that the punctuation goes inside the quotes when it semantically belongs with the quote, and outside the quotes when it belongs with the surrounding sentence.
Well, that makes the most sense to me, too.
Richard W
Posts: 1471
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:53 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Richard W »

zompist wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 5:44 am I reckon y'all are getting Americanized. Y'all're gonna be writing "honor" and "Americanized" soon.
Locales have hit the latter hard for British usage. British spelling with OED preferences is an infrequent option.
Travis B.
Posts: 6850
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Travis B. »

Does anyone else merge metal and medal? I have [ˈmɜɾɯ(ː)]~[mɜːɤ̯] for both of them, whereas I have a contrast between petal [ˈpʰɜɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːɤ̯] and pedal [ˈpʰɜːɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːːɤ̯].
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: English questions

Post by zompist »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:43 pm Does anyone else merge metal and medal? I have [ˈmɜɾɯ(ː)]~[mɜːɤ̯] for both of them, whereas I have a contrast between petal [ˈpʰɜɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːɤ̯] and pedal [ˈpʰɜːɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːːɤ̯].
I do, but I lose the distinction in all post-stress medials. So I'd merge petal/pedal too, and writer/rider.

Only exception I can think of is before syllabic n: Sutton has [ʔ], sudden has [ɾ].
Travis B.
Posts: 6850
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Travis B. »

zompist wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 5:07 pm
Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:43 pm Does anyone else merge metal and medal? I have [ˈmɜɾɯ(ː)]~[mɜːɤ̯] for both of them, whereas I have a contrast between petal [ˈpʰɜɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːɤ̯] and pedal [ˈpʰɜːɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːːɤ̯].
I do, but I lose the distinction in all post-stress medials. So I'd merge petal/pedal too, and writer/rider.

Only exception I can think of is before syllabic n: Sutton has [ʔ], sudden has [ɾ].
I presume you don't have American (or Canadian) raising then? (I say that because writer/rider is given as the classic example of a minimal pair kept apart by American and Canadian raising even for those who don't preserve a vowel length contrast before flapped /t/ and /d/.)
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1694
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: English questions

Post by Man in Space »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:43 pm Does anyone else merge metal and medal? I have [ˈmɜɾɯ(ː)]~[mɜːɤ̯] for both of them, whereas I have a contrast between petal [ˈpʰɜɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːɤ̯] and pedal [ˈpʰɜːɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːːɤ̯].
Only in the phrase “pedal to the metal”, due to analogical interference.
Darren
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Darren »

I merge metal and medal, petal and pedal, Sutton and sudden. Australian English doesn't have pre-obstruent lengthening of short vowels — only of long (i.e. rhotic) vowels and diphthongs, and even then it's only surface level so writer and rider merge too.

Although I don't have a tap before /l n/, I have [d]; [ˈmedɫ̩ʷ], [ˈsädn̩]
zompist
Site Admin
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
Location: Right here, probably
Contact:

Re: English questions

Post by zompist »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 5:22 pm
zompist wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 5:07 pm I do, but I lose the distinction in all post-stress medials. So I'd merge petal/pedal too, and writer/rider.
I presume you don't have American (or Canadian) raising then? (I say that because writer/rider is given as the classic example of a minimal pair kept apart by American and Canadian raising even for those who don't preserve a vowel length contrast before flapped /t/ and /d/.)
Hard to say. I just listened to the examples on Wikipedia, and to me the writer/rider examples sound the same, though I can clearly hear the bowed/bout difference (and I don't have the raising there).
Travis B.
Posts: 6850
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Travis B. »

Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 5:55 pm I merge metal and medal, petal and pedal, Sutton and sudden. Australian English doesn't have pre-obstruent lengthening of short vowels — only of long (i.e. rhotic) vowels and diphthongs, and even then it's only surface level so writer and rider merge too.

Although I don't have a tap before /l n/, I have [d]; [ˈmedɫ̩ʷ], [ˈsädn̩]
(Emphasis mine.)

When you say that, do you imply that only rhotic vowels are long in AusE? I was under the very strong impression that AusE preserved the classic English phonemic vowel length contrast very well, with it in cases like STRUT versus START/PALM/BATH often being the feature which distinguished them.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Darren
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Darren »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 6:44 pm
Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 5:55 pm I merge metal and medal, petal and pedal, Sutton and sudden. Australian English doesn't have pre-obstruent lengthening of short vowels — only of long (i.e. rhotic) vowels and diphthongs, and even then it's only surface level so writer and rider merge too.

Although I don't have a tap before /l n/, I have [d]; [ˈmedɫ̩ʷ], [ˈsädn̩]
(Emphasis mine.)

When you say that, do you imply that only rhotic vowels are long in AusE? I was under the very strong impression that AusE preserved the classic English phonemic vowel length contrast very well, with it in cases like STRUT versus START/PALM/BATH often being the feature which distinguished them.
Long/short vowel pairs are as follows:

KIT [i] vs. NEAR [ɪː~iː]
FOOT [ʊ] vs. NORTH/THOUGHT/FORCE/CURE [ʊː]
DRESS [e̞] vs. SQUARE [eː]
COMMA/LETTER/ROSES [ɜ] vs. NURSE [ɵː]
LAD [æ] vs. BAD [æː]
STRUT [ä] vs. START/PALM/BATH [äː]

The long vowels mostly come from rhotics, and in all cases trigger intrusive /r/ before vowels (with the exception of /æː/, which only occurs pre-consonantally). I call them "rhotic" so there's no confusion with the classic English "long vowels" which are all diphthongs (including RP /iː uː/ → [əi̯ əy̯])
Travis B.
Posts: 6850
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Travis B. »

Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 6:49 pm (including RP /iː uː/ → [əi̯ əy̯])
I didn't know the diphthongization of high long vowels was that extreme in AusE.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Darren
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Darren »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:17 pm
Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 6:49 pm (including RP /iː uː/ → [əi̯ əy̯])
I didn't know the diphthongization of high long vowels was that extreme in AusE.
Oh yes, it's not quite as divergent your dialect but AusE has its innovative points.
bradrn
Posts: 6257
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: English questions

Post by bradrn »

Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:38 pm
Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:17 pm
Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 6:49 pm (including RP /iː uː/ → [əi̯ əy̯])
I didn't know the diphthongization of high long vowels was that extreme in AusE.
Oh yes, it's not quite as divergent your dialect but AusE has its innovative points.
I can’t remember having heard that much diphthongisation, though I know South Australian is a little distinct in some ways. (Or maybe I just need to listen more carefully.)
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Darren
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Darren »

bradrn wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:51 pmI can’t remember having heard that much diphthongisation, though I know South Australian is a little distinct in some ways. (Or maybe I just need to listen more carefully.)
How would you describe your FLEECE and GOOSE vowels?
bradrn
Posts: 6257
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: English questions

Post by bradrn »

Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 9:17 pm
bradrn wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:51 pmI can’t remember having heard that much diphthongisation, though I know South Australian is a little distinct in some ways. (Or maybe I just need to listen more carefully.)
How would you describe your FLEECE and GOOSE vowels?
[iː] and [ʉː], no obvious diphthongisation at all. (This is one of the ways in which my vowels differ substantially from those of ‘normal‘ Australian English.)
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Darren
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Darren »

bradrn wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 9:27 pm
Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 9:17 pm
bradrn wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:51 pmI can’t remember having heard that much diphthongisation, though I know South Australian is a little distinct in some ways. (Or maybe I just need to listen more carefully.)
How would you describe your FLEECE and GOOSE vowels?
[iː] and [ʉː], no obvious diphthongisation at all. (This is one of the ways in which my vowels differ substantially from those of ‘normal‘ Australian English.)
Interesting. I wonder if I mightn't not parse [iː] as NEAR in isolation.
Travis B.
Posts: 6850
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Travis B. »

bradrn wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:51 pm
Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:38 pm
Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:17 pm

I didn't know the diphthongization of high long vowels was that extreme in AusE.
Oh yes, it's not quite as divergent your dialect but AusE has its innovative points.
I can’t remember having heard that much diphthongisation, though I know South Australian is a little distinct in some ways. (Or maybe I just need to listen more carefully.)
When people speak of "diphthongization of high long vowels" I always had thought of them as [ɪj] and [ʊw], i.e. only lightly diphthongized. (I only diphthongize mine when I have /uː/ after a coronal/palatal and before a dorsal, as [yu].)
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Darren
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Darren »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 9:37 pm When people speak of "diphthongization of high long vowels" I always had thought of them as [ɪj] and [ʊw], i.e. only lightly diphthongized. (I only diphthongize mine when I have /uː/ after a coronal/palatal and before a dorsal, as [yu].)
There's register-related alternation; careful [ɪi̯ ʊʉ̯] ranging to casual [əi̯ əy̯]. In unstressed syllables (happY) you might find [ɪi̯] or perhaps even [i], but always [əj] before a vowel ([ˌhæpʰəjɜzˈɫʷæɻɪi̯]). "to" and "gonna" both end in [ɜ] in normal unstressed position, but [əw] (or ?[əɻʷ]) before a vowel; likewise "the" is [ðɜ], [ðəj] (but never *[ðɜɻʷ]).
Travis B.
Posts: 6850
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: English questions

Post by Travis B. »

Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:38 pm
Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:17 pm
Darren wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 6:49 pm (including RP /iː uː/ → [əi̯ əy̯])
I didn't know the diphthongization of high long vowels was that extreme in AusE.
Oh yes, it's not quite as divergent your dialect but AusE has its innovative points.
I don't even intuitively think of my dialect as that divergent when compared to, say, Scottish or Irish English. Higher registers of my dialect really aren't that far from GA. (Much of what passes as funny in it ─ e.g. a phonemic split in /aɪ/ and /ɑr/, /t d n nt nd/ elision, final devoicing, vowel quantity allophony, vowel nasality contrasts, a consonant quantity contrast, /bm/ and /dn/ assimilation to long nasals preceded by unnasalized vowels, etc. ─ really is widespread in NAE but people aren't really aware of it, being deluded into thinking that NAE is this idealized GA that everyone is taught it is.)
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Nortaneous
Posts: 1660
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am

Re: English questions

Post by Nortaneous »

Travis B. wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:43 pm Does anyone else merge metal and medal? I have [ˈmɜɾɯ(ː)]~[mɜːɤ̯] for both of them, whereas I have a contrast between petal [ˈpʰɜɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːɤ̯] and pedal [ˈpʰɜːɾɯ(ː)]~[ˈpʰɜːːɤ̯].
I merge metal/medal and petal/pedal, but not writer/rider ([ɹʌjɾɚ] vs. [ɹa(ɛ̯)ɾɚ]) or Sutton/sudden ([sʌʔ͡tn̩] vs. [sʌdn̩])
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
Post Reply