Innovative Usage Thread

Natural languages and linguistics
User avatar
Raphael
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:36 am

Re: Innovative Usage Thread

Post by Raphael »

I just stopped myself at the last moment from writing "potential" as "potentional".
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1704
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Innovative Usage Thread

Post by Man in Space »

Travis B. wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:49 pm
zompist wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:55 pm
Zju wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:44 pm
Has anyone seen usage like present-years-old him's? Is it innovative or rather common?
That'd be weird for me.
That's weird for me too.
100% not weird to me—I occasionally use constructions like this when I’m referring to how I acted in past events (usually the subtext is there’s something contextually relevant).
Travis B.
Posts: 6897
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:52 pm

Re: Innovative Usage Thread

Post by Travis B. »

Man in Space wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:49 pm
Travis B. wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:49 pm
zompist wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:55 pm

That'd be weird for me.
That's weird for me too.
100% not weird to me—I occasionally use constructions like this when I’m referring to how I acted in past events (usually the subtext is there’s something contextually relevant).
I think we're referring to different things here. "Present-years-old me's" is perfectly okay to me. "Present-years-old him's" is not.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
User avatar
Man in Space
Posts: 1704
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am

Re: Innovative Usage Thread

Post by Man in Space »

Travis B. wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:54 pm
Man in Space wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:49 pm
Travis B. wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:49 pm

That's weird for me too.
100% not weird to me—I occasionally use constructions like this when I’m referring to how I acted in past events (usually the subtext is there’s something contextually relevant).
I think we're referring to different things here. "Present-years-old me's" is perfectly okay to me. "Present-years-old him's" is not.
You are correct; I failed to see the first reply and fixed on the hyperlink.

Still, though, even in something like “X-year-old him’s”, that wouldn’t seem strange to me at all.
Post Reply