cursed natlang features
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: cursed natlang features
For that matter, ‘passive’ doesn’t use the same verb form as ‘past’ — e.g. I sang a song vs The song was sung. (It uses the same verb form as the perfect, but then the diagram would lose its symmetry.)
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2020 9:15 am
Re: cursed natlang features
German has something similar
werden 'to become' + infinitive = future, sein 'to be' + infinitive = absentive
werden 'to become' + p. participle = passive, sein 'to be' + p. participle = the other passive
werden 'to become' + infinitive = future, sein 'to be' + infinitive = absentive
werden 'to become' + p. participle = passive, sein 'to be' + p. participle = the other passive
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: cursed natlang features
Verbal agreement in Sumerian is pretty cursed.
Person is marked on the verb, with prefixes and suffixes; the suffixes also mark plurality.
For intransitives, agreement is easy— you use the suffixes.
For transitives:
* in the perfective, agreement is ergative
- prefixes mark the agent
- suffixes mark the patient
* in the imperfective, agreement is accusative
- prefixes mark the patient
- suffixes mark the agent
- but also plurality of the patient
For added fun, the affixes are not always written, but can be revealed by sandhi phenomena.
Person is marked on the verb, with prefixes and suffixes; the suffixes also mark plurality.
For intransitives, agreement is easy— you use the suffixes.
For transitives:
* in the perfective, agreement is ergative
- prefixes mark the agent
- suffixes mark the patient
* in the imperfective, agreement is accusative
- prefixes mark the patient
- suffixes mark the agent
- but also plurality of the patient
For added fun, the affixes are not always written, but can be revealed by sandhi phenomena.
Re: cursed natlang features
Ooh, this one is fun! (I’m assuming the second paragraph is supposed to be ‘for transitives’.)zompist wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:42 pm For intransitives, agreement is easy— you use the suffixes.
For intransitives:
* in the perfective, agreement is ergative
- prefixes mark the agent
- suffixes mark the patient
* in the imperfective, agreement is accusative
- prefixes mark the patient
- suffixes mark the agent
- but also plurality of the patient
In a way this reminds me of Mayan languages, which also have aspect-driven ergativity or accusativity in their person markers… except there, it’s the intransitive person-marker which switches, while the transitive markers stay the same. I’ve been wondering for some time what the reverse system would look like (where the transitive markers are the ones which vary), and this appears to be it.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices
(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Re: cursed natlang features
true but i forget english grammar all the time
Re: cursed natlang features
granted its not productive *i will be runned is incorrect
Re: cursed natlang features
Probably only accurate if dogs start to talk, though.
Re: cursed natlang features
That's because runned is incorrect, of course? "I will be run" sounds a bit strange if it's a person saying it, but "the program will be run" is perfectly fine.
Nah, it's normal with appropriate context: walking a child to school, walking your grandma to the bank, that sort of thing.
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: cursed natlang features
“At this rate, I will be run out of business in a matter of weeks!”
“He said I will be run out of town if word gets out.”
“I will be run ragged by the end of this.”
Re: cursed natlang features
Actually very true, you got me there.Man in Space wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:04 pm“At this rate, I will be run out of business in a matter of weeks!”
“He said I will be run out of town if word gets out.”
“I will be run ragged by the end of this.”
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: cursed natlang features
Are people finding that mysterious? There's an invisible causativizer going on here. "Run" and "walk" are normally intransitive. But like many verbs they can be used as transitive with causative meaning, that is, "made to run", "made to walk". Thus "we ran him out of town", "I walked the dog."