Zompist Bboard Again

Much of the criticism of Esperanto is aimed at its unsuitability as an IAL, for which the criterions are rather stricter than for an ordinary conlang. In your opinions, how does it fare when considered just as a conlang, with no intended uses otherwise?

I prefer something way more naturalistic; a lot of the grammar looks too regular and without enough regularly occurring complications

It looks like an auxlang. If it's not intended to be an auxlang, that's perhaps something the creator might like to reconsider.

WTF does the subject of this thread mean?

The writing system is a bit shit imho. I kinda get what the creator's trying to get at with the morphology, but it's just a little to rigid and non-naturalistic, and the verbal morphology just seems like an attempt to create a regular agglutinative version of a typical European system without actually truly understanding how such systems function, and leaving massive unexplained gaps in the process.

Imralu wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:49 am WTF does the subject of this thread mean?

Alice has caught the Bob bug it seems.

Also the consonant diacritics are not consistent and non-intuitive