Dis ya de mi lehn it a dem "kustat apl", an dem u famili geda dem gwanabana.
Today I learned there are "custard apples", and they are family of soursops.
JAL
K'astalta-ubōttagu? Möngk'össentöngse.Imralu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 6:10 pmTi naxe zue kuku nu xi ho tieuimoia xeto mainu zuo jeu xu lexi ho kasatarebu.
PRF need search google NOM.1S.ICS ACC.3S.DEF.INAN QUOT cherimoya and.then become.known NOM.C same NOM.3S.DEF.INAN COM.3S.DEF.INAN QUOT custard apple
I had to google cherimoya and I found out that it's the same as a custard apple.
Has atuvinu kuma vu?
Q interr seed NOM.2S.ICS
Did you plant seeds?
K'yat'yut pot'ak' learned what a soursop is. ...somewhat. The wikipedia article isn't entirely clear.
Eni to bahe itui xu ho kueinti.
Ti oila nu jo mue jehu lo mueigu vane mauegauo zuo tijina ixu.Qwynegold wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 11:30 amHau, pot'ak' p'ofōbōdōga mōchōt'pyapk'a uk'ö.
hau, pot'-ak' p'ofōbōd-ōg-a mōchōt'pya-pk'a uk'-ö
yes, 1SG-ERG seed-PL-ABS fruit-ELA take-PST
Yes, I took seeds from the fruit.
Pot'yadu yok'p'ō p'ofōbōda rofōtya udittong, huga pot'ak' ōno udong opk'ūk'yattūk.
pot'ya-du yok'p'-ō p'ofōbōd-a rofōtya udi-tto-ng, hug-a pot'-ak' ōno ud-ong opk'ū-k'ya-ttūk
1SG-ADE one-CLF seed-ABS still be-INTR-PRS, REL.PRON-ABS 1SG-ERG NEG be-PRS sit-CAUS-PST.PTCP
I still have one seed that I haven't planted yet.
Sen o innadatt siotor porh coppa appanuirdin cherimoya
Atk'wūk'p'o. "K'yūlyesku"?
Pot'a rangpa ōnottong udi.Imralu wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:49 pmTi oila nu jo mue jehu lo mueigu vane mauegauo zuo tijina ixu.
- ti
- PRF
- oila
- read
- nu
- NOM.1S.ICS
- jo
- ACC.C
- mue
- able
- jehu
- take.time
- lo
- ADV
- mue-igu
- able-reach
- vane
- five
- maue-gauo
- seven-day
- zuo
- NOM.C
- tt‹ij‹in››a
- large‹INCEP.IPFV‹INCEP.PFV››
- ixu
- NOM.3P.DEF.INAN
I've read that it can take up to five weeks for them to germinate.
Tiezo hana vu lo jehu mo?
- ti-ezo
- PRF-PRES
- hana
- wait
- vu
- NOM.2S.ICS
- lo
- ADV
- jehu
- take.time
- mo
- what
How long have you been waiting?
Amwa! Ōmkya k'ūju ōtp'obuzassan.Imralu wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:49 pmTwo ideas for that construction in case you're stuck for ideas:
Today I learned that which a soursop is. (demonstrative or other pronoun in matrix clause with relative clause hanging from that)
Today I learned that a soursop is what. (interrogative pronoun inside a complement clause)
T'yōt k'ūding uttūk, k'uppopk'o.
Ka hie nu xi.
Gueua luma ixu enio. Naxe hiiama.Qwynegold wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 1:18 pm[Pot'a rangpa ōnottong udi.
pot'-a rangpa ōno-tto-ng udi
1SG-ABS sure NEG-INTR-PRS be.INF
I'm not sure.
T'a rangpwa sok'yuttongpo at'kwa ok'yu allollat kumk'a.
t'-a rangpwa sok'yu-tto-ng-po at'kwa ok'yu allollat kumk'a
3SG.INANIM-ABS probably must-INTR-PRS-COND begin germinate very soon
They should probably start to germinate pretty soon.
You have SOV, postpositions, preposed possessives ... your language would probably tend to have relative clauses before their heads and with the relativising element probably last within the relative clause. That said though, that "must" after the subject makes it look much more like German word order and German has relative clauses after the noun (with the option of making some long, heavy participle phrases before the noun instead, but it's only really done in formal written German). DGS also has SOV word order, but relative clauses come after their heads with the relative pronoun first. (Nouns modified by a relative pronoun tend to be topicalised and fronted along with their relative clause, but the relative clause still follows its head.) You're free to do what you like.Qwynegold wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 1:18 pmPot'a sok'yuttong pofōdutsocha pokkōt pot'yat reletif-polōnaunoga yok'p'onnat SOV-hyanghōppūt kitp'i p'ussofattong.
pot'-a sok'yu-tto-ng pofōdutsocha pokkōt pot'ya-t reletif-polōnaun-og-a yok'p'o-nnat SOV-hyanghōppū-t kitp'i p'ussofa-tto-ng
1SG-ABS must-INTR-PRS contemplate how 1SG-GEN relative-pronoun-PL-ABS one-ILL SOV-order-GEN with fit-INTR-PRS
I need to think about how how my relative pronouns fit together with SOV-order. This sentence was composed in quite an improvised way.
Tis igu ixu enio guni!Imralu wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:00 pm Ti zaba nu zi lubuenio izi euos enio xuis intaneti lo makorese betola xue makorese zanderiana.
- ti
- PRF
- zaba
- buy
- nu
- NOM.1S.ICS
- zi
- ACC.3S.SPEC.INAN
- lubu-enio
- container-plant
- izi
- ACC.3P.SPEC.INAN
- euo-s
- two-EP
- enio
- plant
- xui-s
- ABL.3S.DEF.INAN-EP
- intaneti
- internet
- lo
- ADV
- makorese
- Macodes
- betola
- petola
- xue
- and(VP)
- makorese
- Macodes
- zanderiana
- sanderiana
I've bought a terrarium and two plants on the internet; a Macodes petola and a Macodes sanderiana.
Yaagireebemey riʔaa!
/t͡sʰuɬ bəj saɣ tʰaˈlaŋ?/
Mejaguese: e-oñü ma magge e par ho mö. e-oñü <ł> kar če <ɬ>.
Šaeliapo.bradrn wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 11:19 pm
1. Sik mbas bal ŋgən fawətɬ. Mətshuɬ bəy suʔəɣ ndəl?
2. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetɬ. Me=tshuɬ bey suʔeg ndel?
3. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetł. Me chuł bey suʔeg ndel?
4. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetl. Me chulh bey sueg ndel?
this new 1s POSS language. ERG=which Q please 2p?
This is my new language. Which one [of these romanizations] do you like?
It doesn’t contrast, since every syllable must have an onset.Pabappa wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:49 pmŠaeliapo.bradrn wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 11:19 pm
1. Sik mbas bal ŋgən fawətɬ. Mətshuɬ bəy suʔəɣ ndəl?
2. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetɬ. Me=tshuɬ bey suʔeg ndel?
3. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetł. Me chuł bey suʔeg ndel?
4. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetl. Me chulh bey sueg ndel?
this new 1s POSS language. ERG=which Q please 2p?
This is my new language. Which one [of these romanizations] do you like?
four-LOC-B-ACC-1P
The fourth.
I like neat and tidy orthographies, and assuming /ʔ/ can't contrast with hiatus, I see no reason to spell it at all. However, I also like monographs better than digraphs, so #3 is good too.
Em amne anauh houha, geam gum meom geid yeinohauhbradrn wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 11:19 pm /sik ᵐbas bal ᵑɡən ˈfawət͡ɬ || məˈt͡sʰuɬ bəj ˈsuʔəɣ ⁿdəl/
1. Sik mbas bal ŋgən fawətɬ. Mətshuɬ bəy suʔəɣ ndəl?
2. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetɬ. Me=tshuɬ bey suʔeg ndel?
3. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetł. Me chuł bey suʔeg ndel?
4. Sik mbas bal ngen fawetl. Me chulh bey sueg ndel?
this new 1s POSS language. ERG=which Q please 2p?
This is my new language. Which one [of these romanizations] do you like?
na ke kima'o tsopo