Name That Language!

Natural languages and linguistics
Post Reply
bradrn
Posts: 6262
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by bradrn »

Anyway, I found another text, although I’m not sure how hard it is:
ʔuyil cnu fdix̣qac̓it. ʔa ba fdiqbaq te uyil bk̓olidit ʔa. Heqada bṭeqa ʔuyi šiškidit, ʔol da fdiqas ʔa. Mṭun ʔa mey, paʔšem muṭin walqat, paʔšem muṭin ke walqat, x̣q̓omfo ʔux̣qat kʼli qat, wiy sen mey blomat, ʔumtimfo beqat. ʔaꞏba x̣qac̓it wiy q̓owc̓ikle, xa qlakmat, bxe c̓amat, xac̓it c̓amat. Cada wil da c̓ix̣otkle. Wiy sen blomat, ke x̣q̓omfo x̔olʔyeqat, ke wil ʔol ʔux̣qat kyewkiqya. ʔow, ʔa ṭalkʔo ṭal paʔšem ke danwidi muṭin ké, wiy ke mey ʔawda da q̓owc̓es. Wil ʔwalqat. Bxe c̓amal, xa q̓owic̓, ʔux̣qat ʔwalqat wil. Heqada bcilin, memla bṭoyilki, heqada wali, ʔaꞏba ʔux̣qa kyewkiqdit, ʔxotit. ʔa da fdiqas.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
User avatar
KathTheDragon
Posts: 783
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 3:57 am
Location: Disunited Kingdom

Re: Name That Language!

Post by KathTheDragon »

Whatever happened to "the winner posts the next text" bradrn? That's twice now you've done this.
User avatar
Pabappa
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 11:36 am
Location: the Impossible Forest
Contact:

Re: Name That Language!

Post by Pabappa »

well it's got an /f/, that is interesting .... it seems obvious that this is a Salishan language, except for that /f/ ... Im still going to guess this is a Salishan language that just has defied the trend. Am I right about at least that?

edit: oooh. "Latin Letter Sinological Dot" ....
bradrn
Posts: 6262
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by bradrn »

KathTheDragon wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 9:52 pm Whatever happened to "the winner posts the next text" bradrn? That's twice now you've done this.
I thought I did win:
Nortaneous wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 8:15 pm
bradrn wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 12:41 am Could it be Pumi then?
yes - I would've converted to tone letters but it's not straightforward
Sorry if I was mistaken, though! I’d be happy to delete my challenge if I wasn’t supposed to post it.
Pabappa wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 9:59 pm well it's got an /f/, that is interesting .... it seems obvious that this is a Salishan language, except for that /f/ ... Im still going to guess this is a Salishan language that just has defied the trend. Am I right about at least that?

edit: oooh. "Latin Letter Sinological Dot" ....
Nope, it’s not Salishan at all. And the dot is just a half-colon for vowel length — Sinological Dot just happens to be the closest Unicode character I know of.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
Nortaneous
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by Nortaneous »

rules are fake

afroasiatic?
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
bradrn
Posts: 6262
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by bradrn »

Nortaneous wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 10:17 pm rules are fake
But they’re useful as well. At this point, I’m thinking that it probably would be a good idea to standardise on ‘winner suggests the next text’, if only to avoid a situation where two people try to post a text at the same time.
afroasiatic?
Not even close.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
User avatar
cedh
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:55 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Name That Language!

Post by cedh »

bradrn wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 9:45 pm Anyway, I found another text, although I’m not sure how hard it is:
ʔuyil cnu fdix̣qac̓it. ʔa ba fdiqbaq te uyil bk̓olidit ʔa. Heqada bṭeqa ʔuyi šiškidit, ʔol da fdiqas ʔa. Mṭun ʔa mey, paʔšem muṭin walqat, paʔšem muṭin ke walqat, x̣q̓omfo ʔux̣qat kʼli qat, wiy sen mey blomat, ʔumtimfo beqat. ʔaꞏba x̣qac̓it wiy q̓owc̓ikle, xa qlakmat, bxe c̓amat, xac̓it c̓amat. Cada wil da c̓ix̣otkle. Wiy sen blomat, ke x̣q̓omfo x̔olʔyeqat, ke wil ʔol ʔux̣qat kyewkiqya. ʔow, ʔa ṭalkʔo ṭal paʔšem ke danwidi muṭin ké, wiy ke mey ʔawda da q̓owc̓es. Wil ʔwalqat. Bxe c̓amal, xa q̓owic̓, ʔux̣qat ʔwalqat wil. Heqada bcilin, memla bṭoyilki, heqada wali, ʔaꞏba ʔux̣qa kyewkiqdit, ʔxotit. ʔa da fdiqas.
This does look a lot like it belongs in the Pacific NW, even if it's not Salishan. My guess would be Penutian. Molalla has /ɸ/ but no /ʃ/, so maybe it is Kalapuya?

bradrn wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 10:19 pm At this point, I’m thinking that it probably would be a good idea to standardise on ‘winner suggests the next text’, if only to avoid a situation where two people try to post a text at the same time.
I agree. Also, maybe people shouldn't post two texts at the same time either?

(Nort's second text is still open, and it's a good one...)
Nortaneous wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 10:27 pm
bradrn wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 10:04 pm
Nortaneous wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 9:33 pm 2.
Tíhkaan áhtárú úren yáá enaa ánkáman me kaaín, maahnaáún áátáh kawin, írá aíhaan kaáúh yen kókon wíyon óriyaan umá kurinaín mái yánááh ámáh kaaín, maahnaáúmpín waaháken áátáh káwin, ááhma keín máih yamúh maah úwáh yen máipín tááriyaamíh. Úhpín manaahaa káákan úráran wáhkan, nómpín manaahaa úráran wáhkan, míhan úhkan, manaahaa úráran áyún pahkel awínen kaáín waah iyaamíh. Yunáán unáh yen tááh yen yanon woóren káwé kúh yen ánápín tápo kúh yan, inaaru tían ten wanááan karuhyáretín, yunáán apé íntin, nánoóno. Tíren áátárema yóh yákeín máipíntéh mínoh yunáán unáh yen, mah yamúh wáántá anaati káákan yunáán tááh yen, yáá enáá máh yen, mairah uwíh yen, áná ayóhan meériyaan káwé ayóhan meériyaán úren, manaa wáántá ano owááren temíh.
EDIT: Could it be Papuan?
dang. yes
Is it a Kainantu-Goroka language?
bradrn
Posts: 6262
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by bradrn »

cedh wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:51 am
bradrn wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 9:45 pm Anyway, I found another text, although I’m not sure how hard it is:
ʔuyil cnu fdix̣qac̓it. ʔa ba fdiqbaq te uyil bk̓olidit ʔa. Heqada bṭeqa ʔuyi šiškidit, ʔol da fdiqas ʔa. Mṭun ʔa mey, paʔšem muṭin walqat, paʔšem muṭin ke walqat, x̣q̓omfo ʔux̣qat kʼli qat, wiy sen mey blomat, ʔumtimfo beqat. ʔaꞏba x̣qac̓it wiy q̓owc̓ikle, xa qlakmat, bxe c̓amat, xac̓it c̓amat. Cada wil da c̓ix̣otkle. Wiy sen blomat, ke x̣q̓omfo x̔olʔyeqat, ke wil ʔol ʔux̣qat kyewkiqya. ʔow, ʔa ṭalkʔo ṭal paʔšem ke danwidi muṭin ké, wiy ke mey ʔawda da q̓owc̓es. Wil ʔwalqat. Bxe c̓amal, xa q̓owic̓, ʔux̣qat ʔwalqat wil. Heqada bcilin, memla bṭoyilki, heqada wali, ʔaꞏba ʔux̣qa kyewkiqdit, ʔxotit. ʔa da fdiqas.
This does look a lot like it belongs in the Pacific NW, even if it's not Salishan. My guess would be Penutian. Molalla has /ɸ/ but no /ʃ/, so maybe it is Kalapuya?
It’s not Penutian.
bradrn wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 10:19 pm At this point, I’m thinking that it probably would be a good idea to standardise on ‘winner suggests the next text’, if only to avoid a situation where two people try to post a text at the same time.
I agree. Also, maybe people shouldn't post two texts at the same time either?
That would probably be a good rule as well. (And I say this as someone who has posted two texts at least once.)
(Nort's second text is still open, and it's a good one...)
No it isn’t:
Nortaneous wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 8:15 pm
Karch wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 8:23 am 2 is Agarabi in the old orthography.
yes
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
User avatar
cedh
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:55 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Name That Language!

Post by cedh »

bradrn wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:55 am
cedh wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:51 am (Nort's second text is still open, and it's a good one...)
No it isn’t:
Nortaneous wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 8:15 pm
Karch wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 8:23 am 2 is Agarabi in the old orthography.
yes
Ah, I missed this. But at least I did get the family right :-)

bradrn wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:55 am
cedh wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:51 am
bradrn wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 9:45 pm Anyway, I found another text, although I’m not sure how hard it is:
ʔuyil cnu fdix̣qac̓it. ʔa ba fdiqbaq te uyil bk̓olidit ʔa. Heqada bṭeqa ʔuyi šiškidit, ʔol da fdiqas ʔa. Mṭun ʔa mey, paʔšem muṭin walqat, paʔšem muṭin ke walqat, x̣q̓omfo ʔux̣qat kʼli qat, wiy sen mey blomat, ʔumtimfo beqat. ʔaꞏba x̣qac̓it wiy q̓owc̓ikle, xa qlakmat, bxe c̓amat, xac̓it c̓amat. Cada wil da c̓ix̣otkle. Wiy sen blomat, ke x̣q̓omfo x̔olʔyeqat, ke wil ʔol ʔux̣qat kyewkiqya. ʔow, ʔa ṭalkʔo ṭal paʔšem ke danwidi muṭin ké, wiy ke mey ʔawda da q̓owc̓es. Wil ʔwalqat. Bxe c̓amal, xa q̓owic̓, ʔux̣qat ʔwalqat wil. Heqada bcilin, memla bṭoyilki, heqada wali, ʔaꞏba ʔux̣qa kyewkiqdit, ʔxotit. ʔa da fdiqas.
This does look a lot like it belongs in the Pacific NW, even if it's not Salishan. My guess would be Penutian. Molalla has /ɸ/ but no /ʃ/, so maybe it is Kalapuya?
It’s not Penutian.
Then I'll try going a bit further south into California and looking at the Hokan grouping instead. Pomoan? Specifically, Southeastern Pomo?
bradrn
Posts: 6262
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by bradrn »

cedh wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:14 am
bradrn wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:55 am
cedh wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:51 am
This does look a lot like it belongs in the Pacific NW, even if it's not Salishan. My guess would be Penutian. Molalla has /ɸ/ but no /ʃ/, so maybe it is Kalapuya?
It’s not Penutian.
Then I'll try going a bit further south into California and looking at the Hokan grouping instead. Pomoan? Specifically, Southeastern Pomo?
Very good! It is indeed Southeastern Pomo. (If I may ask: how did you figure that out? I was expecting it to be identified as Pomoan fairly easily, but I didn’t expect people to figure out the language at all easily.)

I believe this means it’s your turn to submit the next text. (If we’re still using that rule, that is.)
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
User avatar
KathTheDragon
Posts: 783
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 3:57 am
Location: Disunited Kingdom

Re: Name That Language!

Post by KathTheDragon »

bradrn wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:34 am I believe this means it’s your turn to submit the next text. (If we’re still using that rule, that is.)
In theory that rule was always being used and should still be being used.
bradrn
Posts: 6262
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:25 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by bradrn »

KathTheDragon wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:53 am
bradrn wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:34 am I believe this means it’s your turn to submit the next text. (If we’re still using that rule, that is.)
In theory that rule was always being used and should still be being used.
In theory, yes. In practise, there seemed to be a bit of disagreement:
Frislander wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 6:03 am Also are we not following the "winner picks the next language" rule?
bradrn wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 6:50 am I think there is a flaw in that rule — when it’s implemented, then virtually the only people who can pick the next language would be you, Nortaneous and Karch! You three seem to be insanely good at figuring out languages, so when e.g. I find an interesting text, I don’t have a hope of posting it if we’re sticking to “winner picks the next language”.
KathTheDragon wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 9:52 pm Whatever happened to "the winner posts the next text" bradrn?
Nortaneous wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 10:17 pm rules are fake
bradrn wrote: Mon May 04, 2020 10:19 pm But they’re useful as well. At this point, I’m thinking that it probably would be a good idea to standardise on ‘winner suggests the next text’, if only to avoid a situation where two people try to post a text at the same time.
(Yes, I contradicted myself there. I think I changed my mind between the two posts.)

I think a big part of the problem is that, as stupid as it sounds, I didn’t actually know about the rule until I saw Frislander’s post (quoted above). Now that I check the first post, I see that fusijui did indeed specify that rule, but I somehow managed to miss it when I first saw this thread. So it was all a bit confusing for a while for me.

I must say I’m not entirely sure how to resolve this. But it seems that most people I quoted like the rule, so for now I will consider it to be in force unless anyone else disagrees.
Conlangs: Scratchpad | Texts | antilanguage
Software: See http://bradrn.com/projects.html
Other: Ergativity for Novices

(Why does phpBB not let me add >5 links here?)
User avatar
cedh
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:55 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Name That Language!

Post by cedh »

bradrn wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:34 am It is indeed Southeastern Pomo. (If I may ask: how did you figure that out? I was expecting it to be identified as Pomoan fairly easily, but I didn’t expect people to figure out the language at all easily.)
The steps were roughly as follows:
1. Looks like it's from the west coast of North America, having ejectives, uvulars, complex consonant clusters etc.
2. Doesn't look like Athabaskan or Wakashan at all.
3. You said it's neither Salishan nor Penutian.
4. That basically leaves Hokan languages and a few isolates and mini-families. At this point I already guessed Pomoan because of the short-to-medium word length and the peculiar phonotactics with apparent mixed-voicing obstruent clusters, but I went to check the phoneme inventories of a few other languages with roughly similar sounds on Wikipedia, just to be sure I wasn't missing anything obvious. These languages were Wappo, Quileute, Atsugewi, Washo, and Chimariko (none of which have a labial fricative) and Karuk (which doesn't have ejectives).
5. Within Pomoan, I also checked the phoneme inventories, and it turned out all the other varieties have aspirated stops but no labial fricative. The Wikipedia page of SE Pomo includes quite a number of example words, and those were a perfect fit for the aesthetic.
I believe this means it’s your turn to submit the next text. (If we’re still using that rule, that is.)
Here's the next language:
Hinadu mamicənɯma çɲamaʔnɯ pweʔatəma tɯʔnamataʔa muniʈʂiʔɲa. Pweʔatəma tɯʔnamataʔa namaʔa aɲɯʔɯ namaʔa pʈʂuʔʂu. Pweʔatəma rɯtaʔsaʔa uʔsuʔəna taskisamaʔa muniʈʂiʔɲa tɯʔnasutuʔnira pweʔatəma. Ɲupumaʔa maʔsənamaʔa pweʔatəma naʔmanira aɲɯʔɯ pʈʂuʔʂu uçuməcumecu. Kwentaʔmaʔniranɯ hinadu mamicənɯma.
Uçuməcumecu mamira ʈʂaʔmu aʔmaʔa tupasiʔnera histeratəma enaʔnira niʈʂuma. Aʔmaʔa mamira ʈʂaʂmɯʈʂətəma raneʔe çamtecumaça samaʔa paʂki. Mamira tuʔsəna uçira. Aʔmaʔa aʈʂəra nuʂtumaʔa çuçi. Çuçimaʔa mamira ʈʂaʔmu waʈʂa weristɯpaʔa.
Frislander
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:40 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by Frislander »

Mixe-Zoquean?
User avatar
cedh
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:55 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Name That Language!

Post by cedh »

Frislander wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 4:03 pmMixe-Zoquean?
No.
Nortaneous
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by Nortaneous »

/tʂ/, /ç/, a back unrounded vowel, and no /o/... Munichi?
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
Birdlang
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 12:38 pm

Re: Name That Language!

Post by Birdlang »

Is that language spoken in the Americas?
User avatar
cedh
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:55 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Name That Language!

Post by cedh »

Birdlang wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 5:51 pm Is that language spoken in the Americas?
Yes. South America, upper Amazon, Peru, to be precise.
Nortaneous wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 5:49 pm /tʂ/, /ç/, a back unrounded vowel, and no /o/... Munichi?
Yes, it's Munichi. (The ethnonym actually occurs in the text: Hinadu mamicənɯma çɲamaʔnɯ pweʔatəma tɯʔnamataʔa muniʈʂiʔɲa.)
fusijui
Posts: 275
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:51 pm

Re: Name That Language!

Post by fusijui »

Just an aside: I love hearing how different people come to their conclusions. More of that, please! And the coming to wrong conclusions is fun too, not just the after-the-fact wrapups.
Nortaneous
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:29 am

Re: Name That Language!

Post by Nortaneous »

this orthography is complicated but I tried
De̠ha̠n ka ge̠, c'lak ge̠ a wa̠ni 'a̠ra̠mn a̠n e̠se̠. Kan 'e̠s co ge̠ nanze'o Tukkuwa. Gam c'pask dkal dkala. Unwa tubala̠m dwiri. Daava̠nl wel anetana, nanze'o Zo̠o̠re. A unoka, male tuhan a̠n rig ba cetaco. To̠, ase ula a uhan ugo̠tte gwe̠l ka̠nka̠n lo̠gine, ugiiti, ubala̠mta dwiri, uhata uhwa. Sai kaa ge kullun ho̠dune, kullun ho̠dune. A icetain a̠n d'hwen, abala̠mka a̠n'a neta v'ru, nanze neta unl Zo̠o̠re. Cetaco rega̠dko kaana, utat bo̠ neta v'ru a̠n k'ta̠a̠sna̠. A utatin neta v'ru a̠n k'ta̠a̠sna, rema̠n wo̠mk k'usipk ta̠m k'gwe̠le̠, natat bo̠ ka ge̠ neta v'ru a̠n k'ta̠a̠sna, ukana. Ato̠uz a'soma, agyiuz n u'bu. Aagyitin n u'bu, cet zanta bo̠ uhava uze, "Zo̠o̠r, i ye̠ ka n ciin kavo, a̠n s'ta̠ngla̠ tahna?" Uze, "za dai i cet a̠n taina̠m de̠e̠de̠ da, rema̠n gwe̠l i'ru da? Ay mhivka̠'u gwe̠le̠." Cbala̠msa ka ge̠, cke̠ka̠l ge̠. He̠, i male tu'ema. Cnapk ay i 'un.
Last edited by Nortaneous on Wed May 06, 2020 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Duaj teibohnggoe kyoe' quaqtoeq lucj lhaj k'yoejdej noeyn tucj.
K'yoejdaq fohm q'ujdoe duaj teibohnggoen dlehq lucj.
Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq. Teijp'vq.
Post Reply