Random Thread
Re: Random Thread
OMG you guise, my friend just texted me like, "What's your availability, P. wants to talk to you about updating his Wikipedia page."
I doubt he's anyone most of you would have heard of but he's a legend in the Chicago underground punk scene. Nothing like this has ever happened to me before! I'm like, "Do I record our conversations for posterity?" Who knows what kind of things a dying man might let drop when talking about his life and career?
I doubt he's anyone most of you would have heard of but he's a legend in the Chicago underground punk scene. Nothing like this has ever happened to me before! I'm like, "Do I record our conversations for posterity?" Who knows what kind of things a dying man might let drop when talking about his life and career?
Re: Random Thread
There's a reason I don't edit Wikipedia.
Yaaludinuya siima d'at yiseka wohadetafa gaare.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Ennadinut'a gaare d'ate eetatadi siiman.
T'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa t'awraa.
Re: Random Thread
I plan to encourage him to put everything he wants to keep in place into his obituary so I can cite it from there later.
I've made lots of unsourced edits and this has never happened to me. I think it has a lot to do with what types of articles you edit.
Update: An editor just responded to my note on his talk page with a suggestion on how to document one of the changes I made. Hopefully he can work with me on getting the other changes (whatever they are) to stick. I'm at a minimum hoping for a better photograph.
- alynnidalar
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:51 am
- Location: Michigan
Re: Random Thread
in fairness, people adding completely unsourced assertions to random people's Wikipedia's pages would not improve its usefulness
- Man in Space
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:05 am
Re: Random Thread
So my bandmates showed me this lyric video from a band who's releasing an album soon, claiming that it was cringy.
I unironically liked the music, and then proceeded to mostly like the second song of theirs they showed me and pre-order the album.
I find this incredibly amusing for reasons I can't comprehend.
I unironically liked the music, and then proceeded to mostly like the second song of theirs they showed me and pre-order the album.
I find this incredibly amusing for reasons I can't comprehend.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 2:12 am
Re: Random Thread
Maybe they would like the music more if they could be bothered to show up for their own band practice?Man in Space wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:13 pm So my bandmates showed me this lyric video from a band who's releasing an album soon, claiming that it was cringy.
I unironically liked the music, and then proceeded to mostly like the second song of theirs they showed me and pre-order the album.
I find this incredibly amusing for reasons I can't comprehend.
I did it. I made the world's worst book review blog.
Re: Random Thread
*waves*
My latest quiz:
[https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/25 ... -kaupungit]Kuvavisa: Pohjois-Amerikan suurimmat P:llä alkavat kaupungit[/url]
[https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/25 ... -kaupungit]Kuvavisa: Pohjois-Amerikan suurimmat P:llä alkavat kaupungit[/url]
Re: Random Thread
Just found what may be the single densest sentence I've ever encountered in an academic paper:
Courtesy of "Insubordination in Japanese diachronically" by Heiko Narrog. Interesting paper, but Jesus Christ I had to read thirty pages of that.However, if we accept the fact that the conventionalized construction with formulaic evaluative expression corresponding to the insubordinate construction is already mono-clausal, we can label it as a 'pseudo-insubordination', like the benefactive construction in the preceding subsection.
Re: Random Thread
auchRisla wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:20 amHowever, if we accept the fact that the conventionalized construction with formulaic evaluative expression corresponding to the insubordinate construction is already mono-clausal, we can label it as a 'pseudo-insubordination', like the benefactive construction in the preceding subsection.
Re: Random Thread
The latest XKCD made me think of the ZBB:
-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 5:16 pm
Re: Random Thread
Seriously though, I lift 40 times a day. What is the minimum weight I need to lift to see some health benefits? The last time I took my weight, I weighed 69 kg.
Re: Random Thread
69 kg seems like a perfectly reasonable amount for a body to weigh. What particular “health benefits” are you looking for?
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 2:12 am
Re: Random Thread
Are you lifting to gain weight or lose weight? Lifting won't do jack shit for weight loss, and if you're trying to gain muscle you need a whole fitness regimen, preferably planned with the help of a personal trainer.
I did it. I made the world's worst book review blog.
-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 5:16 pm
Re: Random Thread
I don't think I'm overweight for my age and height. I spend almost every waking moment hunched over a laptop. Isn't taking a few minutes to exercise good for my metabolism? I've zeroed in on weights because I'm so frail that jerking around my head too much like in jogging or even push ups brings on dizzy spells that may or may not be imaginary.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2949
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: Random Thread
Here's the rule I learned:rotting bones wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2020 5:55 pm I don't think I'm overweight for my age and height. I spend almost every waking moment hunched over a laptop.
- Find the maximum weight you can lift once. Say it's 20 kg.
- Take 70% of that— in this case, 14 kg.
- Do 10 reps of that weight.
The key thing is to keep increasing reps and then weights. If you do 10 reps a day (or 40 or whatever), you will not get stronger, you will only maintain your current strength.
Try to get someone more experienced to make sure you're doing it safely and correctly. It's not too cool to injure your back because you're lifting the wrong way.
-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 5:16 pm
Re: Random Thread
Oh no, 20 lbs is even lighter than 14 kg.
PS. Thanks for the answer.rotting bones wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:39 pm I've started my PhD program plus TA duties. I'm too terrified to go to the gym. I ordered two 10 lb dumbbells online. The were the heaviest available on Walmart. Amazon has locked me out because my old SIM is no longer valid. I can't find the breathing space to contact customer service. Maybe it's for the best for a lightweight like me. I'd lowered the weights from 60 lbs to 40 lbs on either side anyway because it was affecting my concentration. On the other hand, I don't know if 10 lbs will do anything at all. The dumbbells are foam-lined. I think they are for kids. But kids aren't supposed to lift weights IIRC, so I'm confused.
-
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 2:12 am
Re: Random Thread
It sounds like you're not really sure what you're trying to do, other than general metabolic health. This is a situation where a personal trainer would be very helpful. Strength training might not be right for you. You may want to do more cardio, or a mix of both.
I did it. I made the world's worst book review blog.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2949
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:46 am
- Location: Right here, probably
- Contact:
Re: Random Thread
The point is, don't fixate on the number. Fixate on increasing the reps.
So, you have two 10-pound weights. If you do (say) 10 reps, three times a day... you will stay at your current level. Keep increasing the reps.
If you're at the point where you can lift 10 pounds basically indefinitely, then yes, that weight is too low.