I think destroying each-other's sound changes is a bit of a running gag at this point. I also like nasty awful historical orthographies, Classicalising, fake Classicalising, and so on, in addition to my palatals and front vowels.bradrn wrote: ↑Thu May 13, 2021 9:43 amThat’s entirely my fault; I don’t like palatals. In fact, I loathe palatals, especially when ignorant people try to contrast them with palatal-alveolars. That is why I destroy palatals when I see them; I wish to erase all palatals from the world! Death to all palatals!! Bwa-ha-ha-ha-hããã!!!
(At this point I should probably be stroking a white cat or something while maniacally laughing, but all I have is a rather cute tabby who is currently sleeping. Ah well.)
Also, in case you’ve noticed, I don’t like [y] either. But in deference to your complaint, I have refrained from eliminating both palatals and [y] from your text.
On which note, let's see how awful I can make it![ˈwiɐ.lʉn ɨn dɐi ˈɟʑyʃ.ʃɨn wɔnsɐ ðɐi sɛɹɛnt ɹɛːt wʉɐ ˈˀkɐnsɨʃʉsɨt ðɐi 'ʑiɐstɛst mi'jɛttɨˌwi ˌɹɐmɨnˈswɔʉʃɨnnɛn ɨn ˈɕist.tɨ.wi ‖ wiɛ 'ɔʉ.wɨn ˈʃʉɐ.kɨk.sɨˌwiɛt wiɛ ɛnˈwɐʃɨˌtɛnsɨt 'wɛʉʃɨˌɕi ɛnt wʉˈsɐi.ə.ɕi | ˈhʉɐˌʃʉɐ tɛs'twok.kʃɨn | mɐʃ ˌtippʉɐˈswɔʉʃɨn.nɛn | ɛnt ɛˈmɐnʃ ɟʑyʃʃɐ ɟʑiɛ tʃɛʉ ʃəm'vɛtt | ɨɕɕiɐˈwɔʉʃɨn | ɛkkˈsɸʉɐʒə | tɨˈʒɐi | ɛnt ˈmɛɕc.cɕiɐ.wɛn]At this point, the government becomes sick of the revolving-door orthography and associated constant warfare between the various groups, and legislates the ‘Nyoo Funetik Alfabet Akt 2198’, criminalising ‘ol uttempts to wilfilee and malishuslee alter dhe speling ov dhe Ingglish Langwij’, to general acclaim. No further orthographical changes are attempted after this.
- Disappearance of preglottalisation
- ʃ ʒ → ʂ ʐ
- iɛ → iə, iV → jV, #wj → #uj; ʉV → wV, ww → uw
- ɹ → ∅
- ˈV₁jV₂C → ˈV₁jC
- ‘Labial–velar chain shift’: ɸ w → ɸ β → p b; k kk → w k; c cɕ → k
- Regressive voicing assimilation in newly-formed clusters (with some associated geminate shortening)
[ˈuj.lʉn ɨn dɐi ˈɟʑyʂ.ʂɨn bɔnsɐ ðɐi sɛ.ɛnt ɛːt ubɐ ˈwɐnsɨʂʉsɨt ðɐi 'ʑjɐstɛst mi'jɛttɨˌbi ˌɐmɨnˈzbɔʉʂɨnnɛn ɨn ˈɕist.tɨ.bi ‖ ujə 'ɔʉ.bɨn ˈʐbɐ.wɨw.sɨbˌjɛt ujə ɛnˈbɐʂɨˌtɛnsɨt 'bɛʉʂɨˌɕi ɛnt bʉˈsɐj.ɕi | ˈɦbɐˌʐbɐ tɛz'dbo.kʂɨn | mɐʂ ˌtibbɐˈzbɔʉʂɨn.nɛn | ɛnt ɛˈmɐnʂ ɟʑyʂʂɐ ɟʑjə tʂɛʉ ʂəm'vɛtt | ɨɕɕjɐˈbɔʉʂɨn | ɛɡˈzbɐʐə | tɨˈʐɐi | ɛnt ˈmɛɕk.kjɐ.bɛn]
Ujlʉn yn dai Djüṣṣyn Bonsa dhai Seent Eet Uba wansyṣʉsyt dhai zjastest mijettybi amynzbouṣynnen yn sjisttybi. Uyə oubyn ẓbawywsybjet uyə enbaṣytensyt beuṣysji ent bʉsajsji. Hbaẓba tezdbokṣyn, maṣ tibbazbouṣynnen, ent emanṣ djüṣṣa djə tṣeu ṣəmvett, yssjabouṣyn, egzbaẓə, tyẓai, ent mesjkkjaben.
- [ɕ] > [çj], but [j] drops out before [i]
- [ɨ] tenses to [i], [ə] merges with [ɔ] in isolation, but [y] after [j]; [ɔ o] merge to [ɔ]
- The new [i] triggers even more palatalisation, [ʂ s] > [ɕ], [t] > [cɕ], [k] > [c] > [cç]
- [uj, wiw] > [jy]
- A consonant before a string of two or more of the same consonant will insert an epinthetic [ʉ], except palatals instead eject [i]; at the beginning of the word, [ʉ] is inserted before or into a string of consonants; in these cases, [n] does not usually trigger epenthesis. Consonants at the end of a word that are not [n] also receive [ʉ]
- Voiceless stops devoice, with single [p] > [ɸ]; and further > [w] medially, but geminating in coda before [j]
- [t] > [ts] before [ʉ]
- [v] > [w]
- Remaining sequences of anything other than [n] + consonant tend to become geminates, [ʂ] > [s]
- [wi] > [jy]
- Diphthongs smooth [ɐi~ɐj] > [eː], [ɔʉ] > [oː], [ɛʉ] > [joː]
- [l] > [j]
[ˈjy.jyn in teː ˈɟʑyɕ.ɕin ɸɔnsɐ teː sɛ.ɛn.tsʉ ɛː.tsʉ uwɐ ˌwɐn.ɕi.sʉ'ɕi.tsʉ teː ʑjɐt'tɛt.tsʉ mi'jɛc.cɕiˌjy ˌɐminʉp'poːɕin.nɛn in ˈçisʉ.ccɕi.jy ‖ ujy 'oː.jyn ˈʉppɐ.jy.ɕipˌpjɛ.tsʉ ujy ɛnˈpɐ.ɕiˌtɛn'ɕi.tsʉ 'pjoː.ɕiˌçi ɛn.tsʉ ɸʉˈseː.çi | ʉp'pɐp.pɐ tɛppʉ'wɔɕ.ɕin | mɐ.sʉ ˌcɕip.pɐp'poːɕin.nɛn | ɛn.tsʉ ɛˈmɐnsʉ ɟʑyssɐ ɟʑjy cɕjoː sɔ.mʉ'wɛt.tsʉ | iççjɐˈwoːɕin | ɛ.kʉp.pɐ.zɔ | cɕiˈzeː | ɛn.tsʉ mɛ'ɕic.cçjɐ.bɛn]
Changes occurred a large migration to a Japanese-speaking environment, and were partly conditioned by the superstratum language, which was a very conservative variety; the Government there prescribing the following Katakana orthography. There are talks of introducing Kanji, but these are met with reluctance by some, and excitement by others.
ユユン イン テイ ヂュッシン ホンサ テイ セセンツ エイツ ウワ ワンシスシツ テイ ヂャッテツ ミエッチユ アミヌッポウシンネン イン ヒスッチユ。ウユ オウユン ウッパユシッピェツ ウユ エンバシ テンシツ ビョウシヒ エンツ フセイヒ、ウッパッパ テップヲッシン、マス チッパッポウシンネン、エンツ エマンス ヂュッサ ヂュ チョウ ソムヱツ、イッヒャヲウシン、エクッパゾ、チゼイ、エンツ メシッキャベン。
Yuyun in tei jusshin fonsa tei sesentsu entsu uwa wanshisushitsu tei juttentsu miecchiyu amasuppoushinnen in hisucchiyu. Uyu ouyun uppayushippyetsu uyu enpashi tenshitsu pyoushihi entsu fuseihi, uppappa teppuwosshin, masu chippappoushinnen, entsu emansu jussa ju chou somuwettsu, ihhyawoushin, ekuppazo, shizei, entsu messhikkyaben.
Is it destroyed enough now that I've turned it into Japanese?