Moose-tache wrote: ↑Mon Dec 05, 2022 5:36 pm
It's possible Keenir's flippant responses were an attempt to prod you to give more information,
*nods* It usually is. though I don't aim for flippancy...to be fair, I can't always tell when i'm being flippant. (sarcasm, i can at least guess at)
rather than a sign of not having read books. Giving someone you disagree with on the internet a reading list is very 2007.
I've watched the Dictators Guide on CGP Grey, if it helps - were they the same?
https://youtu.be/rStL7niR7gs (i thought there was a dictator one; sorry)
Hey, I remember this from Max Miller's youtube channel.
But what does that have to do with what you see as the difference between spices and flavors?
keenir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:57 pm
Why not? You get extra points for giving to monks, in regeneration terms.
Monks weren't supposed to carry expensive items. Kind of defeats the point.
No, they weren't supposed to
own expensive items.
On the other hand, there's an old saying from one of the Buddhist denominations:
Two monks were walking across the land and one day came to a river's edge.
There, they met a woman who was in need of help to cross the river. One monk wasn't sure they should help because she's a woman; the second monk said sure, and carried her across. Once the three of them were on the other side of the river, the second monk put her down and the woman thanked them and walked off on whatever journey she herself was on. The two monks continued onwards, though the first monk kept worrying that his traveling buddy had doomed himself by carrying a girl
-- after a while, he couldn't hold it in any longer, and told the second monk of his concerns.
The second monk looked at him and said "Yes, I carried her across the river, but then I forgot about her as soon as I set her on the ground. Have you been carrying her {in your mind} all this time?" To which, the first monk realized to his horror that the guy was right.
keenir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:57 pm
Not sure it has to be an either-or.
Since I already mentioned a reasonable interpretation of this in a part you dropped from the quote, what could be stronger? That all Protestant virtue is inherently racism?
I never said all Protestest virtue is racist. I'm saying that the Victorians would be shocked that you think they can be only one thing.
keenir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:57 pm
Then could you please explain what you mean by "high culture" so we don't think you're referring to the cooks that everyone wants?
keenir wrote: ↑Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:57 pm
If that was true, wouldn't they lionize the famished and monoculturally agricultural Irish?
I could explain these to anyone else, but long experience has taught me that you fundamentally don't understand authoritarian power dynamics
I asked you to define "high culture" because of your reaction when the replies involved multiple nations seeking to hire French cooks. Not sure how you're reading power dynamics in a desire to have French chefs in London and St Petersburg.
This stuff is hard to read, but truth comes from these kinds of books, not spiritual disciplines.
So in other words, you object to obedience to a physical teacher imparting wisdom to a student...but if its in book form, you love it?
I'm confused again.