Sound Change Quickie Thread

Conworlds and conlangs
Darren
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Darren »

bradrn wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:47 am
Darren wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:46 am
bradrn wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 1:08 am (A similar example from English: the verb help used to have past tense holp, but in modern English the suffix -ed has been generalised, such that the standard past tense form is now helped. Similarly for heave, shave and a bunch of other verbs. But English verbs are complicated enough that analogy can work in the opposite direction too: e.g. bring sometimes gets past tense brang or brung, by analogy with verbs like wring and spring.)
I have heard that English verbs reached peak regularity in the Middle Ages and since then the trend of analogy has been more in favour of strong verbs, although I don't know where they got their figures from.
Huh, really? I’m skeptical.
There's a fair few examples like digged → dug, wreaked → wrought (thus making "wreak" one of English's three suppletive verbs)
Zju
Posts: 944
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:05 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zju »

It's suppletive from a diachronic point of view, but I wonder if it can be synchronically analysed as suppletive, what with 'seak - sought'; or as one of only three, that is
/j/ <j>

Ɂaləɂahina asəkipaɂə ileku omkiroro salka.
Loɂ ɂerleku asəɂulŋusikraɂə seləɂahina əɂətlahɂun əiŋɂiɂŋa.
Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ.
User avatar
Emily
Posts: 415
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:24 am
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Emily »

yeah i'm skeptical too, for every "brung" getting formed there's another "throve" turning into "thrived" due to lack of use and reinforce
Darren
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Darren »

I think that "irregular" also includes the numerous analogical -en past forms (gotten, putten, slowen) and -t forms (wet, fit, built) both of which are undoubtedly on the rise.
User avatar
Raholeun
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:09 am
Location: sub omnibus canonibus

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Raholeun »

How likely would it be for a regular voicing distinction in stops to unconditionally develop into a contrast stiff vs.slack stops? For example, *p, *b > /p, b̥/. Are there known natural language examples of such a shift?
Zju
Posts: 944
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:05 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zju »

Javanese?
/j/ <j>

Ɂaləɂahina asəkipaɂə ileku omkiroro salka.
Loɂ ɂerleku asəɂulŋusikraɂə seləɂahina əɂətlahɂun əiŋɂiɂŋa.
Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ. Hərlaɂ.
User avatar
dɮ the phoneme
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 2:53 am
Location: On either side of the tongue, below the alveolar ridge
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by dɮ the phoneme »

Is there any language in which stress regularly precedes a heavy syllable?
Ye knowe eek that, in forme of speche is chaunge
With-inne a thousand yeer, and wordes tho
That hadden pris, now wonder nyce and straunge
Us thinketh hem; and yet they spake hem so,
And spedde as wel in love as men now do.

(formerly Max1461)
Ares Land
Posts: 3215
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:35 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Ares Land »

WALS thinks there aren't any: https://wals.info/chapter/15
The universal property of a weight-sensitive system is that in cases (1a) and (1b) stress will always be located on the heavy syllable.
Post Reply